Chemicals - Specialty
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
HDSN vs AIRG vs TAOP vs GILT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Communication Equipment
Software - Infrastructure
Communication Equipment
HDSN vs AIRG vs TAOP vs GILT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Chemicals - Specialty | Communication Equipment | Software - Infrastructure | Communication Equipment |
| Market Cap | $225M | $89M | $1M | $1.38B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $251M | $51M | $36M | $452M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $14M | $-6M | $-7M | $21M |
| Gross Margin | 24.6% | 43.6% | 14.9% | 29.5% |
| Operating Margin | 6.7% | -14.6% | -15.7% | 3.6% |
| Forward P/E | 11.7x | — | — | 37.7x |
| Total Debt | $3M | $9M | $10M | $11M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $39M | $7M | $2M | $169M |
HDSN vs AIRG vs TAOP vs GILT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hudson Technologies… (HDSN) | 100 | 595.5 | +495.5% |
| Airgain, Inc. (AIRG) | 100 | 80.3 | -19.7% |
| Taoping Inc. (TAOP) | 100 | 0.2 | -99.8% |
| Gilat Satellite Net… (GILT) | 100 | 225.4 | +125.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HDSN vs AIRG vs TAOP vs GILT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HDSN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.45, Low D/E 1.3%, current ratio 3.26x
- Lower P/E (11.7x vs 37.7x)
- 5.7% margin vs TAOP's -19.6%
- 4.4% ROA vs TAOP's -21.7%, ROIC 7.1% vs -27.1%
AIRG is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 0.29, current ratio 1.98x
- Beta 0.29 vs TAOP's 2.30, lower leverage
TAOP is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 2.30
GILT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 47.9%, EPS growth -22.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 23.5%
- 358.8% 10Y total return vs HDSN's 45.6%
- 47.9% revenue growth vs TAOP's -16.0%
- +186.3% vs TAOP's -78.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 47.9% revenue growth vs TAOP's -16.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.7x vs 37.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.7% margin vs TAOP's -19.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.29 vs TAOP's 2.30, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +186.3% vs TAOP's -78.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.4% ROA vs TAOP's -21.7%, ROIC 7.1% vs -27.1% |
HDSN vs AIRG vs TAOP vs GILT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
HDSN vs AIRG vs TAOP vs GILT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HDSN leads in 1 of 6 categories
GILT leads 1 • AIRG leads 1 • TAOP leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — HDSN and AIRG and GILT each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GILT is the larger business by revenue, generating $452M annually — 12.5x TAOP's $36M. HDSN is the more profitable business, keeping 5.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TAOP's -19.6%. On growth, GILT holds the edge at +75.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $251M | $51M | $36M | $452M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $22M | -$6M | -$4M | $40M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $14M | -$6M | -$7M | $21M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$35M | -$1M | -$3M | $10M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +24.6% | +43.6% | +14.9% | +29.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.7% | -14.6% | -15.7% | +3.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.7% | -11.5% | -19.6% | +4.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -13.9% | -2.4% | -8.1% | +2.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.7% | -4.2% | -2.6% | +75.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -83.3% | +38.5% | -51.7% | -38.1% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — HDSN and TAOP each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.3x trailing earnings, HDSN trades at a 74% valuation discount to GILT's 55.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, HDSN's 7.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GILT's 27.8x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $225M | $89M | $1M | $1.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $189M | $90M | $9M | $1.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 14.32x | -13.43x | -0.16x | 55.41x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.71x | — | — | 37.68x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.69x | — | — | 27.81x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.91x | 1.71x | 0.04x | 3.05x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.94x | 3.03x | 0.08x | 2.27x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 150.06x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HDSN leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HDSN delivers a 5.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-47 for TAOP. HDSN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TAOP's 0.50x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AIRG scores 4/9 vs TAOP's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.7% | -20.4% | -46.7% | +4.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.4% | -13.1% | -21.7% | +2.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.1% | -22.8% | -27.1% | +5.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.3% | -25.2% | -38.0% | +4.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.30x | 0.50x | 0.02x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$36M | $1M | $8M | -$158M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $39M | $7M | $2M | $169M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3M | $9M | $10M | $11M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 26.24x | — | -52.63x | 5.18x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GILT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HDSN five years ago would be worth $24,537 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7 for TAOP. Over the past 12 months, GILT leads with a +186.3% total return vs TAOP's -78.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GILT at 51.4% vs TAOP's -80.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -22.1% | +77.7% | -6.8% | +40.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -21.0% | +78.6% | -78.3% | +186.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -31.8% | +25.9% | -99.3% | +247.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +145.4% | -66.3% | -99.9% | +95.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +45.6% | -9.4% | -99.9% | +358.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -12.0% | +8.0% | -80.9% | +51.4% |
Risk & Volatility
AIRG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AIRG is the less volatile stock with a 0.29 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TAOP's 2.30 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AIRG currently trades 98.1% from its 52-week high vs TAOP's 6.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.45x | 0.29x | 2.30x | 2.09x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $10.52 | $7.39 | $20.10 | $20.56 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.21 | $3.00 | $1.18 | $5.43 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +50.4% | +98.1% | +6.4% | +91.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.1 | 73.3 | 53.1 | 63.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 337K | 90K | 20K | 650K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HDSN as "Hold", GILT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 82.5% upside for HDSN (target: $10) vs -62.8% for GILT (target: $7).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | — | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $9.67 | — | — | $7.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | — | — | 2 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +8.9% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
HDSN leads in 1 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency). GILT leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
HDSN vs AIRG vs TAOP vs GILT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HDSN or AIRG or TAOP or GILT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd.
(GILT) is the stronger pick with 47. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -16. 0% for Taoping Inc. (TAOP). Hudson Technologies, Inc. (HDSN) offers the better valuation at 14. 3x trailing P/E (11. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd. (GILT) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HDSN or AIRG or TAOP or GILT?
On trailing P/E, Hudson Technologies, Inc.
(HDSN) is the cheapest at 14. 3x versus Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd. at 55. 4x. On forward P/E, Hudson Technologies, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HDSN or AIRG or TAOP or GILT?
Over the past 5 years, Hudson Technologies, Inc.
(HDSN) delivered a total return of +145. 4%, compared to -99. 9% for Taoping Inc. (TAOP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GILT returned +358. 8% versus TAOP's -99. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HDSN or AIRG or TAOP or GILT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Airgain, Inc.
(AIRG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 29β versus Taoping Inc. 's 2. 30β — meaning TAOP is approximately 695% more volatile than AIRG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Hudson Technologies, Inc. (HDSN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 50% for Taoping Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HDSN or AIRG or TAOP or GILT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd.
(GILT) is pulling ahead at 47. 9% versus -16. 0% for Taoping Inc. (TAOP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Airgain, Inc. grew EPS 31. 6% year-over-year, compared to -1870. 0% for Taoping Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GILT leads at 23. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HDSN or AIRG or TAOP or GILT?
Hudson Technologies, Inc.
(HDSN) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 8% net margin versus -32. 7% for Taoping Inc. — meaning it keeps 6. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HDSN leads at 7. 5% versus -29. 0% for TAOP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AIRG leads at 43. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HDSN or AIRG or TAOP or GILT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Hudson Technologies, Inc.
(HDSN) trades at 11. 7x forward P/E versus 37. 7x for Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd. — 26. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HDSN: 82. 5% to $9. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — HDSN or AIRG or TAOP or GILT?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is HDSN or AIRG or TAOP or GILT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Airgain, Inc.
(AIRG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 29)). Taoping Inc. (TAOP) carries a higher beta of 2. 30 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AIRG: -9. 4%, TAOP: -99. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HDSN and AIRG and TAOP and GILT?
These companies operate in different sectors (HDSN (Basic Materials) and AIRG (Technology) and TAOP (Technology) and GILT (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: HDSN is a small-cap deep-value stock; AIRG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TAOP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GILT is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.