HDSN
Hudson Technologies, Inc.
Chemicals - Specialty
Market Cap$225M
5Y Perf.+495.5%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
HDSN vs ASX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
ASX
ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd.
Semiconductors
Market Cap$72.90B
5Y Perf.+717.2%
HDSN vs ASX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | HDSN | ASX |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Chemicals - Specialty | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $225M | $72.90B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $251M | $666.14B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $14M | $47.13B |
| Gross Margin | 24.6% | 18.3% |
| Operating Margin | 6.7% | 8.8% |
| Forward P/E | 11.7x | 1.0x |
| Total Debt | $3M | $264.10B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $39M | $92.47B |
HDSN vs ASX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
HDSN
ASX
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hudson Technologies… (HDSN) | 100 | 595.5 | +495.5% |
| ASE Technology Hold… (ASX) | 100 | 817.2 | +717.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HDSN vs ASX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: ASX leads in 6 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Hudson Technologies, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
HDSN
Hudson Technologies, Inc.
The Income Pick
HDSN is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 1.45
- Lower volatility, beta 1.45, Low D/E 1.3%, current ratio 3.26x
- Beta 1.45, current ratio 3.26x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
ASX
ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd.
The Growth Play
ASX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 6.8%, EPS growth 27.7%, 3Y rev CAGR -1.5%
- 6.8% 10Y total return vs HDSN's 45.6%
- 6.8% revenue growth vs HDSN's 4.0%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | ASX | 6.8% revenue growth vs HDSN's 4.0% |
| Value | ASX | Lower P/E (1.0x vs 11.7x) |
| Quality / Margins | ASX | 7.1% margin vs HDSN's 5.7% |
| Stability / Safety | HDSN | Beta 1.45 vs ASX's 1.61, lower leverage |
| Dividends | ASX | 1.0% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | ASX | +270.3% vs HDSN's -21.0% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | ASX | 5.5% ROA vs HDSN's 4.4%, ROIC 7.6% vs 7.1% |
HDSN vs ASX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2022
HDSN vs ASX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLASXLAGGINGHDSN
HDSNHudson Technologies, …
1leads
ASXASE Technology Holdin…
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs HDSNMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
ASX5/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
HDSN4/5
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
ASX5/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
ASX6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ASX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ASX is the larger business by revenue, generating $666.1B annually — 2649.5x HDSN's $251M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 7.1% (ASX) to 5.7% (HDSN). On growth, ASX holds the edge at +17.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | HDSNHudson Technologi… | ASXASE Technology Ho… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $251M | $666.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $22M | $127.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $14M | $47.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$35M | -$6.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +24.6% | +18.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.7% | +8.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.7% | +7.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -13.9% | -0.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.7% | +17.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -83.3% | +95.1% |
ASX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
HDSN leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.3x trailing earnings, HDSN trades at a 75% valuation discount to ASX's 56.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, HDSN's 7.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ASX's 20.7x.
| Metric | HDSNHudson Technologi… | ASXASE Technology Ho… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $225M | $72.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $189M | $78.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 14.32x | 56.57x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.71x | 1.04x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 7.16x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.69x | 20.66x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.91x | 3.52x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.94x | 6.19x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
HDSN leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ASX leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ASX delivers a 13.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $6 for HDSN. HDSN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ASX's 0.71x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ASX scores 6/9 vs HDSN's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | HDSNHudson Technologi… | ASXASE Technology Ho… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.7% | +13.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.4% | +5.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.1% | +7.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.3% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.71x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$36M | $171.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $39M | $92.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3M | $264.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 26.24x | 10.27x |
ASX leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ASX leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ASX five years ago would be worth $43,154 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $24,537 for HDSN. Over the past 12 months, ASX leads with a +270.3% total return vs HDSN's -21.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ASX at 69.7% vs HDSN's -12.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | HDSNHudson Technologi… | ASXASE Technology Ho… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -22.1% | +97.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -21.0% | +270.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -31.8% | +388.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +145.4% | +331.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +45.6% | +684.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -12.0% | +69.7% |
ASX leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HDSN and ASX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HDSN is the less volatile stock with a 1.45 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ASX's 1.61 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ASX currently trades 97.4% from its 52-week high vs HDSN's 50.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | HDSNHudson Technologi… | ASXASE Technology Ho… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.45x | 1.61x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $10.52 | $34.22 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.21 | $8.89 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +50.4% | +97.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.1 | 80.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 337K | 6.9M |
Evenly matched — HDSN and ASX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates HDSN as "Hold" and ASX as "Buy". ASX is the only dividend payer here at 1.00% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | HDSNHudson Technologi… | ASXASE Technology Ho… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $9.67 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 5 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $10.46 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +8.9% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
ASX leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). HDSN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
Best OverallASE Technology Holding Co.,… (ASX)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
HDSN vs ASX: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HDSN or ASX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, ASE Technology Holding Co.
, Ltd. (ASX) is the stronger pick with 6. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 0% for Hudson Technologies, Inc. (HDSN). Hudson Technologies, Inc. (HDSN) offers the better valuation at 14. 3x trailing P/E (11. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ASE Technology Holding Co. , Ltd. (ASX) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HDSN or ASX?
On trailing P/E, Hudson Technologies, Inc.
(HDSN) is the cheapest at 14. 3x versus ASE Technology Holding Co. , Ltd. at 56. 6x. On forward P/E, ASE Technology Holding Co. , Ltd. is actually cheaper at 1. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HDSN or ASX?
Over the past 5 years, ASE Technology Holding Co.
, Ltd. (ASX) delivered a total return of +331. 5%, compared to +145. 4% for Hudson Technologies, Inc. (HDSN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ASX returned +684. 8% versus HDSN's +45. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HDSN or ASX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hudson Technologies, Inc.
(HDSN) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 45β versus ASE Technology Holding Co. , Ltd. 's 1. 61β — meaning ASX is approximately 11% more volatile than HDSN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Hudson Technologies, Inc. (HDSN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 71% for ASE Technology Holding Co. , Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HDSN or ASX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), ASE Technology Holding Co.
, Ltd. (ASX) is pulling ahead at 6. 8% versus 4. 0% for Hudson Technologies, Inc. (HDSN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ASE Technology Holding Co. , Ltd. grew EPS 27. 7% year-over-year, compared to -28. 8% for Hudson Technologies, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ASX leads at -1. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HDSN or ASX?
Hudson Technologies, Inc.
(HDSN) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 8% net margin versus 6. 3% for ASE Technology Holding Co. , Ltd. — meaning it keeps 6. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ASX leads at 7. 9% versus 7. 5% for HDSN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HDSN leads at 25. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HDSN or ASX more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, ASE Technology Holding Co.
, Ltd. (ASX) trades at 1. 0x forward P/E versus 11. 7x for Hudson Technologies, Inc. — 10. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — HDSN or ASX?
In this comparison, ASX (1.
0% yield) pays a dividend. HDSN does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is HDSN or ASX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, ASE Technology Holding Co.
, Ltd. (ASX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1. 0% yield, +684. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ASX: +684. 8%, HDSN: +45. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HDSN and ASX?
These companies operate in different sectors (HDSN (Basic Materials) and ASX (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: HDSN is a small-cap deep-value stock; ASX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. ASX pays a dividend while HDSN does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(HDSN: 8.7% · ASX: 17.4%)Net Margin>
%
(HDSN: 5.7% · ASX: 7.1%)P/E Ratio<
x
(HDSN: 14.3x · ASX: 56.6x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.