Oil & Gas Midstream
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
HESM vs DKL vs MPLX vs TRGP vs EPD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Midstream
Oil & Gas Midstream
Oil & Gas Midstream
Oil & Gas Midstream
HESM vs DKL vs MPLX vs TRGP vs EPD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream |
| Market Cap | $8.05B | $2.71B | $57.12B | $54.26B | $81.56B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.62B | $1.06B | $12.54B | $16.38B | $52.60B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $353M | $170M | $4.71B | $2.13B | $5.80B |
| Gross Margin | 75.0% | 19.2% | 60.0% | 22.1% | 13.6% |
| Operating Margin | 62.2% | 16.5% | 44.9% | 21.1% | 13.5% |
| Forward P/E | 13.3x | 13.8x | 12.7x | 24.9x | 13.1x |
| Total Debt | $3.77B | $35M | $26.16B | $17.55B | $34.93B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $11M | $2.14B | $166M | $1.25B |
HESM vs DKL vs MPLX vs TRGP vs EPD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hess Midstream LP (HESM) | 100 | 198.8 | +98.8% |
| Delek Logistics Par… (DKL) | 100 | 214.3 | +114.3% |
| MPLX Lp (MPLX) | 100 | 296.3 | +196.3% |
| Targa Resources Cor… (TRGP) | 100 | 1411.1 | +1311.1% |
| Enterprise Products… (EPD) | 100 | 197.5 | +97.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HESM vs DKL vs MPLX vs TRGP vs EPD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HESM has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 8.7%, EPS growth 14.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.4%
- PEG 0.79 vs EPD's 1.42
- 8.7% revenue growth vs EPD's -6.4%
- PEG 0.79 vs 1.42
DKL ranks third and is worth considering specifically for dividends.
- 8.7% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs EPD's 5.7%
MPLX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if defensive is your priority.
- Beta 0.18, yield 7.0%, current ratio 1.23x
- 37.5% margin vs EPD's 11.0%
- 11.3% ROA vs DKL's 6.1%, ROIC 9.9% vs 14.1%
TRGP is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 6.2% 10Y total return vs MPLX's 184.4%
- +61.6% vs HESM's +10.9%
EPD is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.06, yield 5.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.06, current ratio 1.04x
- Beta 0.06 vs DKL's 0.35, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.7% revenue growth vs EPD's -6.4% | |
| Value | PEG 0.79 vs 1.42 | |
| Quality / Margins | 37.5% margin vs EPD's 11.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.06 vs DKL's 0.35, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 8.7% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs EPD's 5.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +61.6% vs HESM's +10.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.3% ROA vs DKL's 6.1%, ROIC 9.9% vs 14.1% |
HESM vs DKL vs MPLX vs TRGP vs EPD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
HESM vs DKL vs MPLX vs TRGP vs EPD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HESM leads in 1 of 6 categories
TRGP leads 1 • DKL leads 0 • MPLX leads 0 • EPD leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HESM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EPD is the larger business by revenue, generating $52.6B annually — 49.6x DKL's $1.1B. MPLX is the more profitable business, keeping 37.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to EPD's 11.0%. On growth, DKL holds the edge at +19.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.6B | $1.1B | $12.5B | $16.4B | $52.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.2B | $310M | $7.0B | $5.0B | $9.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $353M | $170M | $4.7B | $2.1B | $5.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $585M | $112M | $5.0B | $1.2B | $3.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +75.0% | +19.2% | +60.0% | +22.1% | +13.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +62.2% | +16.5% | +44.9% | +21.1% | +13.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +21.8% | +16.0% | +37.5% | +13.0% | +11.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +36.1% | +10.6% | +39.8% | +7.1% | +5.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.3% | +19.0% | +5.2% | -15.6% | -2.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.9% | -17.8% | -17.3% | -100.0% | +2.7% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — HESM and MPLX and EPD each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.7x trailing earnings, MPLX trades at a 61% valuation discount to TRGP's 29.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HESM offers better value at 0.80x vs EPD's 1.54x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $8.0B | $2.7B | $57.1B | $54.3B | $81.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $11.8B | $2.7B | $81.1B | $71.6B | $115.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.50x | 15.46x | 11.67x | 29.63x | 14.18x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.29x | 13.82x | 12.71x | 24.88x | 13.14x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.80x | — | — | — | 1.54x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.67x | 8.81x | 13.27x | 14.44x | 12.10x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.96x | 2.68x | 4.83x | 3.17x | 1.55x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 10.85x | 446.88x | 3.95x | 16.97x | 2.70x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.05x | — | 13.93x | 92.90x | 27.51x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — HESM and DKL each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DKL delivers a 19.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $19 for EPD. EPD carries lower financial leverage with a 1.14x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HESM's 8.61x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HESM scores 6/9 vs DKL's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +74.9% | +19.2% | +32.8% | +70.8% | +19.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.1% | +6.1% | +11.3% | +8.5% | +7.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +18.6% | +14.1% | +9.9% | +13.2% | +8.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +24.8% | +8.3% | +12.9% | +16.7% | +10.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 8.61x | 5.75x | 1.80x | 5.49x | 1.14x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.8B | $24M | $24.0B | $17.4B | $33.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $11M | $2.1B | $166M | $1.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.8B | $35M | $26.2B | $17.5B | $34.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.54x | 1.66x | 5.85x | 6.52x | 5.21x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TRGP leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TRGP five years ago would be worth $69,223 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $18,598 for DKL. Over the past 12 months, TRGP leads with a +61.6% total return vs HESM's +10.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TRGP at 54.4% vs DKL's 13.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +13.6% | +13.4% | +6.4% | +36.4% | +20.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +10.9% | +45.1% | +22.5% | +61.6% | +31.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +62.9% | +45.6% | +95.7% | +268.0% | +73.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +123.1% | +86.0% | +157.2% | +592.2% | +105.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +121.2% | +207.3% | +184.4% | +618.0% | +119.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +17.7% | +13.3% | +25.1% | +54.4% | +20.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TRGP and EPD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EPD is the less volatile stock with a 0.06 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DKL's 0.35 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TRGP currently trades 96.4% from its 52-week high vs HESM's 87.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.27x | 0.35x | 0.18x | 0.29x | 0.06x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $44.14 | $55.89 | $59.98 | $261.95 | $39.73 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $31.63 | $37.50 | $47.80 | $144.14 | $29.90 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +87.5% | +91.3% | +93.8% | +96.4% | +95.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.1 | 50.0 | 46.5 | 54.1 | 47.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.6M | 64K | 1.8M | 1.3M | 4.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — DKL and EPD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HESM as "Hold", DKL as "Hold", MPLX as "Buy", TRGP as "Buy", EPD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 9.8% upside for DKL (target: $56) vs -17.1% for HESM (target: $32). For income investors, DKL offers the higher dividend yield at 8.72% vs TRGP's 1.51%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $32.00 | $56.00 | $60.25 | $237.70 | $37.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 10 | 28 | 33 | 45 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +7.4% | +8.7% | +7.0% | +1.5% | +5.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 7 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.84 | $4.45 | $3.94 | $3.81 | $2.14 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +5.0% | +0.4% | +0.7% | +1.2% | +0.4% |
HESM leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). TRGP leads in 1 (Total Returns). 4 tied.
HESM vs DKL vs MPLX vs TRGP vs EPD: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HESM or DKL or MPLX or TRGP or EPD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Hess Midstream LP (HESM) is the stronger pick with 8.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 4% for Enterprise Products Partners L. P. (EPD). MPLX Lp (MPLX) offers the better valuation at 11. 7x trailing P/E (12. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate MPLX Lp (MPLX) a "Buy" — based on 28 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HESM or DKL or MPLX or TRGP or EPD?
On trailing P/E, MPLX Lp (MPLX) is the cheapest at 11.
7x versus Targa Resources Corp. at 29. 6x. On forward P/E, MPLX Lp is actually cheaper at 12. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Hess Midstream LP wins at 0. 79x versus Enterprise Products Partners L. P. 's 1. 42x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HESM or DKL or MPLX or TRGP or EPD?
Over the past 5 years, Targa Resources Corp.
(TRGP) delivered a total return of +592. 2%, compared to +86. 0% for Delek Logistics Partners, LP (DKL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TRGP returned +618. 0% versus EPD's +119. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HESM or DKL or MPLX or TRGP or EPD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Enterprise Products Partners L.
P. (EPD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 06β versus Delek Logistics Partners, LP's 0. 35β — meaning DKL is approximately 454% more volatile than EPD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Enterprise Products Partners L. P. (EPD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 114% versus 9% for Hess Midstream LP — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HESM or DKL or MPLX or TRGP or EPD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hess Midstream LP (HESM) is pulling ahead at 8.
7% versus -6. 4% for Enterprise Products Partners L. P. (EPD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Targa Resources Corp. grew EPS 48. 4% year-over-year, compared to -1. 1% for Enterprise Products Partners L. P.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HESM leads at 8. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HESM or DKL or MPLX or TRGP or EPD?
MPLX Lp (MPLX) is the more profitable company, earning 41.
6% net margin versus 10. 8% for Targa Resources Corp. — meaning it keeps 41. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HESM leads at 62. 2% versus 13. 1% for EPD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HESM leads at 63. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HESM or DKL or MPLX or TRGP or EPD more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Hess Midstream LP (HESM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 79x versus Enterprise Products Partners L. P. 's 1. 42x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, MPLX Lp (MPLX) trades at 12. 7x forward P/E versus 24. 9x for Targa Resources Corp. — 12. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DKL: 9. 8% to $56. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — HESM or DKL or MPLX or TRGP or EPD?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Delek Logistics Partners, LP (DKL) offers the highest yield at 8. 7%, versus 1. 5% for Targa Resources Corp. (TRGP).
09Is HESM or DKL or MPLX or TRGP or EPD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Targa Resources Corp.
(TRGP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 29), 1. 5% yield, +618. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TRGP: +618. 0%, DKL: +207. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HESM and DKL and MPLX and TRGP and EPD?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: HESM is a small-cap deep-value stock; DKL is a small-cap deep-value stock; MPLX is a mid-cap deep-value stock; TRGP is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; EPD is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.