HHH
Howard Hughes Holdings Inc.
Real Estate - Diversified
Market Cap$3.82B
5Y Perf.+32.9%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
HHH vs FPH
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
FPH
Five Point Holdings, LLC
Real Estate - Development
Market Cap$3.55B
5Y Perf.-1.0%
HHH vs FPH — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | HHH | FPH |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Real Estate - Diversified | Real Estate - Development |
| Market Cap | $3.82B | $3.55B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.47B | $110M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $124M | $41M |
| Gross Margin | 18.7% | 40.4% |
| Operating Margin | 17.2% | -1.1% |
| Forward P/E | 18.4x | 16.5x |
| Total Debt | $5.11B | $514M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.47B | $427M |
HHH vs FPH — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
HHH
FPH
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Howard Hughes Holdi… (HHH) | 100 | 132.9 | +32.9% |
| Five Point Holdings… (FPH) | 100 | 99.0 | -1.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HHH vs FPH
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: FPH leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
HHH
Howard Hughes Holdings Inc.
The Real Estate Income Play
HHH is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth -15.8%, EPS growth -47.0%, 3Y rev CAGR -0.3%
- -32.4% 10Y total return vs FPH's -67.0%
- -15.8% FFO/revenue growth vs FPH's -53.8%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
FPH
Five Point Holdings, LLC
The Real Estate Income Play
FPH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 0.87
- Lower volatility, beta 0.87, Low D/E 21.5%, current ratio 4.02x
- Beta 0.87, current ratio 4.02x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | HHH | -15.8% FFO/revenue growth vs FPH's -53.8% |
| Value | FPH | Lower P/E (16.5x vs 18.4x) |
| Quality / Margins | FPH | 37.0% margin vs HHH's 8.4% |
| Stability / Safety | FPH | Beta 0.87 vs HHH's 0.99, lower leverage |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | FPH | -6.1% vs HHH's -6.5% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | FPH | 1.3% ROA vs HHH's 1.2%, ROIC -0.2% vs 2.6% |
HHH vs FPH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2025
HHH vs FPH — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLFPHLAGGINGHHH
HHHHoward Hughes Holding…
0leads
FPHFive Point Holdings, …
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs HHHMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
Tied
—
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
FPH3/5
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
Tied
—
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
FPH5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
FPH2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — HHH and FPH each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HHH is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.5B annually — 13.4x FPH's $110M. FPH is the more profitable business, keeping 37.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HHH's 8.4%. On growth, FPH holds the edge at +3.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | HHHHoward Hughes Hol… | FPHFive Point Holdin… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.5B | $110M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $437M | $2M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $124M | $41M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $457M | $4M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +18.7% | +40.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +17.2% | -1.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +8.4% | +37.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +31.0% | +3.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -36.5% | +3.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -96.8% | -118.8% |
Evenly matched — HHH and FPH each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
FPH leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.3x trailing earnings, FPH trades at a 66% valuation discount to HHH's 30.5x P/E.
| Metric | HHHHoward Hughes Hol… | FPHFive Point Holdin… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.8B | $3.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7.5B | $3.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 30.53x | 10.33x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 18.37x | 16.53x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 17.10x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.59x | 32.24x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.99x | 0.31x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.67x | 33.78x |
FPH leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — HHH and FPH each lead in 4 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HHH delivers a 3.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $3 in annual profit, vs $2 for FPH. FPH carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HHH's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HHH scores 5/9 vs FPH's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | HHHHoward Hughes Hol… | FPHFive Point Holdin… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.5% | +1.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.2% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.6% | -0.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.7% | -0.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.33x | 0.22x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.6B | $88M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.5B | $427M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5.1B | $514M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.93x | — |
Evenly matched — HHH and FPH each lead in 4 of 8 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FPH leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FPH five years ago would be worth $6,889 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,520 for HHH. Over the past 12 months, FPH leads with a -6.1% total return vs HHH's -6.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FPH at 27.9% vs HHH's -2.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | HHHHoward Hughes Hol… | FPHFive Point Holdin… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -18.6% | -8.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -6.5% | -6.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -7.5% | +109.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -34.8% | -31.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -32.4% | -67.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -2.6% | +27.9% |
FPH leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FPH leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FPH is the less volatile stock with a 0.87 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HHH's 0.99 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FPH currently trades 74.7% from its 52-week high vs HHH's 70.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | HHHHoward Hughes Hol… | FPHFive Point Holdin… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.99x | 0.87x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $91.07 | $6.64 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $61.01 | $4.72 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +70.4% | +74.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.0 | 45.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 495K | 189K |
FPH leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates HHH as "Buy" and FPH as "Hold".
| Metric | HHHHoward Hughes Hol… | FPHFive Point Holdin… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $87.50 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 5 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
FPH leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Valuation Metrics and Total Returns. 2 categories are tied.
Best OverallFive Point Holdings, LLC (FPH)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
HHH vs FPH: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HHH or FPH a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Howard Hughes Holdings Inc.
(HHH) is the stronger pick with -15. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -53. 8% for Five Point Holdings, LLC (FPH). Five Point Holdings, LLC (FPH) offers the better valuation at 10. 3x trailing P/E (16. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. (HHH) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HHH or FPH?
On trailing P/E, Five Point Holdings, LLC (FPH) is the cheapest at 10.
3x versus Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. at 30. 5x. On forward P/E, Five Point Holdings, LLC is actually cheaper at 16. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HHH or FPH?
Over the past 5 years, Five Point Holdings, LLC (FPH) delivered a total return of -31.
1%, compared to -34. 8% for Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. (HHH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HHH returned -32. 4% versus FPH's -67. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HHH or FPH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Five Point Holdings, LLC (FPH) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
87β versus Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. 's 0. 99β — meaning HHH is approximately 14% more volatile than FPH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Five Point Holdings, LLC (FPH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 133% for Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HHH or FPH?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Howard Hughes Holdings Inc.
(HHH) is pulling ahead at -15. 8% versus -53. 8% for Five Point Holdings, LLC (FPH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. grew EPS -47. 0% year-over-year, compared to -50. 0% for Five Point Holdings, LLC. Over a 3-year CAGR, FPH leads at 37. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HHH or FPH?
Five Point Holdings, LLC (FPH) is the more profitable company, earning 64.
5% net margin versus 8. 4% for Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. — meaning it keeps 64. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HHH leads at 17. 2% versus -6. 7% for FPH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FPH leads at 48. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HHH or FPH more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Five Point Holdings, LLC (FPH) trades at 16.
5x forward P/E versus 18. 4x for Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. — 1. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — HHH or FPH?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is HHH or FPH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Five Point Holdings, LLC (FPH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
87)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FPH: -67. 0%, HHH: -32. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HHH and FPH?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: HHH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FPH is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(HHH: -36.5% · FPH: 3.2%)Net Margin>
%
(HHH: 8.4% · FPH: 37.0%)P/E Ratio<
x
(HHH: 30.5x · FPH: 10.3x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.