HI
Hillenbrand, Inc.
Industrial - Machinery
Market Cap$2.26B
5Y Perf.+24.2%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
HI vs KMT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
KMT
Kennametal Inc.
Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories
Market Cap$2.86B
5Y Perf.+24.0%
HI vs KMT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | HI | KMT |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Machinery | Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories |
| Market Cap | $2.26B | $2.86B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.52B | $2.03B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $35M | $110M |
| Gross Margin | 33.7% | 31.1% |
| Operating Margin | 6.1% | 8.3% |
| Forward P/E | 12.4x | 15.4x |
| Total Debt | $1.60B | $643M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $165M | $141M |
HI vs KMT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
HI
KMT
| Stock | May 20 | Feb 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hillenbrand, Inc. (HI) | 100 | 124.2 | +24.2% |
| Kennametal Inc. (KMT) | 100 | 124.0 | +24.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HI vs KMT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: KMT leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Hillenbrand, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and dividend income and shareholder returns. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
HI
Hillenbrand, Inc.
The Income Pick
HI is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 1.92, yield 2.8%
- Rev growth -16.0%, EPS growth 120.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.9%
- Lower P/E (12.4x vs 15.4x)
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
KMT
Kennametal Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder
KMT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 93.0% 10Y total return vs HI's 35.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.31, Low D/E 48.6%, current ratio 2.46x
- Beta 1.31, yield 2.1%, current ratio 2.46x
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | KMT | -3.9% revenue growth vs HI's -16.0% |
| Value | HI | Lower P/E (12.4x vs 15.4x) |
| Quality / Margins | KMT | 5.4% margin vs HI's 1.4% |
| Stability / Safety | KMT | Beta 1.31 vs HI's 1.92, lower leverage |
| Dividends | HI | 2.8% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs KMT's 2.1% |
| Momentum (1Y) | KMT | +91.9% vs HI's +59.5% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | KMT | 4.2% ROA vs HI's 0.8%, ROIC 5.9% vs 3.8% |
HI vs KMT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
HI vs KMT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLKMTLAGGINGHI
HIHillenbrand, Inc.
1leads
KMTKennametal Inc.
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs HIMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
KMT5/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
Tied
—
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
KMT8/8
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
KMT6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
HI2/2
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KMT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HI and KMT operate at a comparable scale, with $2.5B and $2.0B in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 5.4% (KMT) to 1.4% (HI). On growth, KMT holds the edge at +9.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | HIHillenbrand, Inc. | KMTKennametal Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.5B | $2.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $286M | $272M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $35M | $110M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $8M | $99M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +33.7% | +31.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.1% | +8.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.4% | +5.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.3% | +4.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -22.2% | +9.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -133.1% | +91.3% |
KMT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — HI and KMT each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 31.3x trailing earnings, KMT trades at a 40% valuation discount to HI's 52.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, KMT's 12.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HI's 12.5x.
| Metric | HIHillenbrand, Inc. | KMTKennametal Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.3B | $2.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.7B | $3.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 52.43x | 31.26x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.41x | 15.38x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.54x | 12.02x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.85x | 1.45x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.59x | 2.21x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 126.31x | 23.95x |
Evenly matched — HI and KMT each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KMT leads this category, winning 8 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KMT delivers a 8.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $2 for HI. KMT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.49x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HI's 1.12x.
| Metric | HIHillenbrand, Inc. | KMTKennametal Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.4% | +8.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.8% | +4.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.8% | +5.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.2% | +6.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.12x | 0.49x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.4B | $503M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $165M | $141M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.6B | $643M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.67x | 7.35x |
KMT leads this category, winning 8 of 8 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KMT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KMT five years ago would be worth $10,022 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,860 for HI. Over the past 12 months, KMT leads with a +91.9% total return vs HI's +59.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KMT at 14.0% vs HI's -9.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | HIHillenbrand, Inc. | KMTKennametal Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +0.8% | +30.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +59.5% | +91.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -26.7% | +48.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -21.4% | +0.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +35.0% | +93.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -9.8% | +14.0% |
KMT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HI and KMT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KMT is the less volatile stock with a 1.31 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HI's 1.92 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HI currently trades 99.7% from its 52-week high vs KMT's 89.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | HIHillenbrand, Inc. | KMTKennametal Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.92x | 1.31x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $32.07 | $42.03 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $18.46 | $17.62 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.7% | +89.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 68.2 | 40.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 0 | 1.2M |
Evenly matched — HI and KMT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
HI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates HI as "Buy" and KMT as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 0.1% upside for HI (target: $32) vs -4.0% for KMT (target: $36). For income investors, HI offers the higher dividend yield at 2.80% vs KMT's 2.12%.
| Metric | HIHillenbrand, Inc. | KMTKennametal Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $32.00 | $36.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 23 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.8% | +2.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.90 | $0.79 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.1% |
HI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
KMT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). HI leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.
Best OverallKennametal Inc. (KMT)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
HI vs KMT: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HI or KMT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Kennametal Inc.
(KMT) is the stronger pick with -3. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -16. 0% for Hillenbrand, Inc. (HI). Kennametal Inc. (KMT) offers the better valuation at 31. 3x trailing P/E (15. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Hillenbrand, Inc. (HI) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HI or KMT?
On trailing P/E, Kennametal Inc.
(KMT) is the cheapest at 31. 3x versus Hillenbrand, Inc. at 52. 4x. On forward P/E, Hillenbrand, Inc. is actually cheaper at 12. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HI or KMT?
Over the past 5 years, Kennametal Inc.
(KMT) delivered a total return of +0. 2%, compared to -21. 4% for Hillenbrand, Inc. (HI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KMT returned +93. 0% versus HI's +35. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HI or KMT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Kennametal Inc.
(KMT) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 31β versus Hillenbrand, Inc. 's 1. 92β — meaning HI is approximately 46% more volatile than KMT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Kennametal Inc. (KMT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 49% versus 112% for Hillenbrand, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HI or KMT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Kennametal Inc.
(KMT) is pulling ahead at -3. 9% versus -16. 0% for Hillenbrand, Inc. (HI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hillenbrand, Inc. grew EPS 120. 3% year-over-year, compared to -12. 4% for Kennametal Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HI leads at 4. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HI or KMT?
Kennametal Inc.
(KMT) is the more profitable company, earning 4. 7% net margin versus 1. 6% for Hillenbrand, Inc. — meaning it keeps 4. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KMT leads at 7. 3% versus 5. 9% for HI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HI leads at 33. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HI or KMT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Hillenbrand, Inc.
(HI) trades at 12. 4x forward P/E versus 15. 4x for Kennametal Inc. — 3. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HI: 0. 1% to $32. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — HI or KMT?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Hillenbrand, Inc. (HI) offers the highest yield at 2. 8%, versus 2. 1% for Kennametal Inc. (KMT).
09Is HI or KMT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Kennametal Inc.
(KMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (2. 1% yield). Hillenbrand, Inc. (HI) carries a higher beta of 1. 92 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KMT: +93. 0%, HI: +35. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HI and KMT?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(HI: -22.2% · KMT: 9.8%)P/E Ratio<
x
(HI: 52.4x · KMT: 31.3x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.