HI vs KMT vs ITT vs GTLS

For growth investors, ITT Inc.

(ITT) is the stronger pick with 8. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -16. 0% for Hillenbrand, Inc. (HI). ITT Inc. (ITT) offers the better valuation at 34. 0x trailing P/E (27. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Hillenbrand, Inc. (HI) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, ITT Inc.

(ITT) is the cheapest at 34. 0x versus Chart Industries, Inc. at 628. 5x. On forward P/E, Hillenbrand, Inc. is actually cheaper at 12. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, ITT Inc.

(ITT) delivered a total return of +115. 8%, compared to -21. 6% for Hillenbrand, Inc. (HI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GTLS returned +772. 5% versus HI's +33. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Chart Industries, Inc.

(GTLS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 56β versus Hillenbrand, Inc. 's 1. 92β — meaning HI is approximately 244% more volatile than GTLS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ITT Inc. (ITT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 23% versus 112% for Hillenbrand, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), ITT Inc.

(ITT) is pulling ahead at 8. 5% versus -16. 0% for Hillenbrand, Inc. (HI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hillenbrand, Inc. grew EPS 120. 3% year-over-year, compared to -92. 0% for Chart Industries, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GTLS leads at 38. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

ITT Inc.

(ITT) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 4% net margin versus 1. 0% for Chart Industries, Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ITT leads at 17. 4% versus 5. 9% for HI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ITT leads at 35. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Hillenbrand, Inc.

(HI) trades at 12. 4x forward P/E versus 27. 1x for ITT Inc. — 14. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ITT: 10. 6% to $229. 67.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Hillenbrand, Inc. (HI) offers the highest yield at 2. 8%, versus 0. 3% for Chart Industries, Inc. (GTLS).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Chart Industries, Inc.

(GTLS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 56), +772. 5% 10Y return). Hillenbrand, Inc. (HI) carries a higher beta of 1. 92 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GTLS: +772. 5%, HI: +33. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

HI, KMT, ITT pay a dividend while GTLS does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.