Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

HIFS vs NWBI

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
HIFS
Hingham Institution for Savings

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$626M
5Y Perf.+74.8%
NWBI
Northwest Bancshares, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.02B
5Y Perf.+38.9%

HIFS vs NWBI — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
HIFS logoHIFS
NWBI logoNWBI
IndustryBanks - RegionalBanks - Regional
Market Cap$626M$2.02B
Revenue (TTM)$217M$877M
Net Income (TTM)$45M$126M
Gross Margin30.1%68.3%
Operating Margin16.8%18.8%
Forward P/E20.4x10.2x
Total Debt$1.50B$446M
Cash & Equiv.$352M$234M

HIFS vs NWBILong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

HIFS
NWBI
StockMay 20May 26Return
Hingham Institution… (HIFS)100174.8+74.8%
Northwest Bancshare… (NWBI)100138.9+38.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: HIFS vs NWBI

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: NWBI leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Hingham Institution for Savings is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
HIFS
Hingham Institution for Savings
The Banking Pick

HIFS is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 142.5% 10Y total return vs NWBI's 52.3%
  • Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs NWBI's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
  • Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs NWBI's 0.5%
Best for: long-term compounding
NWBI
Northwest Bancshares, Inc.
The Banking Pick

NWBI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.73, yield 5.4%
  • Rev growth 16.3%, EPS growth 16.5%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.73, Low D/E 23.6%, current ratio 0.13x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthNWBI logoNWBI16.3% NII/revenue growth vs HIFS's 14.1%
ValueNWBI logoNWBILower P/E (10.2x vs 20.4x)
Quality / MarginsHIFS logoHIFSEfficiency ratio 0.1% vs NWBI's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
Stability / SafetyNWBI logoNWBIBeta 0.73 vs HIFS's 1.25, lower leverage
DividendsNWBI logoNWBI5.4% yield, vs HIFS's 0.9%
Momentum (1Y)NWBI logoNWBI+18.3% vs HIFS's +14.4%
Efficiency (ROA)HIFS logoHIFSEfficiency ratio 0.1% vs NWBI's 0.5%

HIFS vs NWBI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

HIFSHingham Institution for Savings

Segment breakdown not available.

NWBINorthwest Bancshares, Inc.
FY 2025
Banking Segment
100.0%$879M

HIFS vs NWBI — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLNWBILAGGINGHIFS

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

NWBI leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

NWBI is the larger business by revenue, generating $877M annually — 4.0x HIFS's $217M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 14.4% (NWBI) to 13.0% (HIFS).

MetricHIFS logoHIFSHingham Instituti…NWBI logoNWBINorthwest Bancsha…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$217M$877M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$62M$166M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$45M$126M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$30M$142M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+30.1%+68.3%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+16.8%+18.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+13.0%+14.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+5.4%+16.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+195.1%+19.2%
NWBI leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

NWBI leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 15.0x trailing earnings, NWBI trades at a 33% valuation discount to HIFS's 22.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NWBI's 13.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HIFS's 47.5x.

MetricHIFS logoHIFSHingham Instituti…NWBI logoNWBINorthwest Bancsha…
Market CapShares × price$626M$2.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1.8B$2.2B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS22.33x15.03x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.20.43x10.20x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.83x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple47.53x13.57x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.88x2.31x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.46x1.07x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF53.27x14.27x
NWBI leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

NWBI leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

HIFS delivers a 9.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $7 for NWBI. NWBI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.24x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HIFS's 3.47x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NWBI scores 7/9 vs HIFS's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricHIFS logoHIFSHingham Instituti…NWBI logoNWBINorthwest Bancsha…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+9.8%+7.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.0%+0.8%
ROICReturn on invested capital+1.4%+5.6%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+2.2%+6.8%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–957
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage3.47x0.24x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$1.1B$213M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$352M$234M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$1.5B$446M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.44x0.73x
NWBI leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — HIFS and NWBI each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in NWBI five years ago would be worth $12,663 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,808 for HIFS. Over the past 12 months, NWBI leads with a +18.3% total return vs HIFS's +14.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HIFS at 17.4% vs NWBI's 16.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricHIFS logoHIFSHingham Instituti…NWBI logoNWBINorthwest Bancsha…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+6.3%+18.8%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+14.4%+18.3%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+61.9%+56.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-1.9%+26.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+142.5%+52.3%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+17.4%+16.0%
Evenly matched — HIFS and NWBI each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

NWBI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

NWBI is the less volatile stock with a 0.73 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HIFS's 1.25 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NWBI currently trades 97.0% from its 52-week high vs HIFS's 84.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricHIFS logoHIFSHingham Instituti…NWBI logoNWBINorthwest Bancsha…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.25x0.73x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$338.00$14.26
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$220.76$11.25
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+84.9%+97.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10051.064.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded51K1.3M
NWBI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

NWBI leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

For income investors, NWBI offers the higher dividend yield at 5.42% vs HIFS's 0.87%.

MetricHIFS logoHIFSHingham Instituti…NWBI logoNWBINorthwest Bancsha…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$14.67
# AnalystsCovering analysts14
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.9%+5.4%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises00
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$2.50$0.75
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%
NWBI leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

NWBI leads in 5 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 1 category is tied.

Best OverallNorthwest Bancshares, Inc. (NWBI)Leads 5 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

HIFS vs NWBI: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is HIFS or NWBI a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Northwest Bancshares, Inc.

(NWBI) is the stronger pick with 16. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 14. 1% for Hingham Institution for Savings (HIFS). Northwest Bancshares, Inc. (NWBI) offers the better valuation at 15. 0x trailing P/E (10. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Northwest Bancshares, Inc. (NWBI) a "Hold" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — HIFS or NWBI?

On trailing P/E, Northwest Bancshares, Inc.

(NWBI) is the cheapest at 15. 0x versus Hingham Institution for Savings at 22. 3x. On forward P/E, Northwest Bancshares, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 2x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — HIFS or NWBI?

Over the past 5 years, Northwest Bancshares, Inc.

(NWBI) delivered a total return of +26. 6%, compared to -1. 9% for Hingham Institution for Savings (HIFS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HIFS returned +142. 5% versus NWBI's +52. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — HIFS or NWBI?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Northwest Bancshares, Inc.

(NWBI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 73β versus Hingham Institution for Savings's 1. 25β — meaning HIFS is approximately 71% more volatile than NWBI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Northwest Bancshares, Inc. (NWBI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 24% versus 3% for Hingham Institution for Savings — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — HIFS or NWBI?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Northwest Bancshares, Inc.

(NWBI) is pulling ahead at 16. 3% versus 14. 1% for Hingham Institution for Savings (HIFS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Northwest Bancshares, Inc. grew EPS 16. 5% year-over-year, compared to 6. 8% for Hingham Institution for Savings. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — HIFS or NWBI?

Northwest Bancshares, Inc.

(NWBI) is the more profitable company, earning 14. 4% net margin versus 13. 0% for Hingham Institution for Savings — meaning it keeps 14. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NWBI leads at 18. 8% versus 16. 8% for HIFS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NWBI leads at 68. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is HIFS or NWBI more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Northwest Bancshares, Inc.

(NWBI) trades at 10. 2x forward P/E versus 20. 4x for Hingham Institution for Savings — 10. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.

08

Which pays a better dividend — HIFS or NWBI?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Northwest Bancshares, Inc. (NWBI) offers the highest yield at 5. 4%, versus 0. 9% for Hingham Institution for Savings (HIFS).

09

Is HIFS or NWBI better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Northwest Bancshares, Inc.

(NWBI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 73), 5. 4% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NWBI: +52. 3%, HIFS: +142. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between HIFS and NWBI?

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: HIFS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NWBI is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

HIFS

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
  • Net Margin > 7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NWBI

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 8%
  • Net Margin > 8%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform HIFS and NWBI on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(HIFS: 14.1% · NWBI: 16.3%)
Net Margin>
%
(HIFS: 13.0% · NWBI: 14.4%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(HIFS: 22.3x · NWBI: 15.0x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.