Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
HIFS vs NWBI vs NBTB vs FULT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
HIFS vs NWBI vs NBTB vs FULT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $626M | $2.02B | $2.35B | $4.13B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $217M | $877M | $867M | $1.89B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $45M | $126M | $169M | $392M |
| Gross Margin | 30.1% | 68.3% | 72.1% | 67.4% |
| Operating Margin | 16.8% | 18.8% | 25.3% | 25.7% |
| Forward P/E | 20.4x | 10.2x | 10.8x | 10.6x |
| Total Debt | $1.50B | $446M | $327M | $1.30B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $352M | $234M | $185M | $271M |
HIFS vs NWBI vs NBTB vs FULT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hingham Institution… (HIFS) | 100 | 174.8 | +74.8% |
| Northwest Bancshare… (NWBI) | 100 | 138.9 | +38.9% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 143.9 | +43.9% |
| Fulton Financial Co… (FULT) | 100 | 191.3 | +91.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HIFS vs NWBI vs NBTB vs FULT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HIFS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs NWBI's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs NWBI's 0.5%
NWBI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.73, yield 5.4%
- Rev growth 16.3%, EPS growth 16.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.73, Low D/E 23.6%, current ratio 0.13x
- Beta 0.73, yield 5.4%, current ratio 0.13x
NBTB lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
FULT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 106.1% 10Y total return vs HIFS's 142.5%
- PEG 0.76 vs NBTB's 1.53
- NIM 3.2% vs HIFS's 1.0%
- +29.6% vs NBTB's +9.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 16.3% NII/revenue growth vs FULT's 5.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.2x vs 20.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs NWBI's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.73 vs HIFS's 1.25, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 5.4% yield, vs NBTB's 3.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +29.6% vs NBTB's +9.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs NWBI's 0.5% |
HIFS vs NWBI vs NBTB vs FULT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
HIFS vs NWBI vs NBTB vs FULT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FULT leads in 2 of 6 categories
NBTB leads 1 • NWBI leads 1 • HIFS leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — NBTB and FULT each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FULT is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.9B annually — 8.7x HIFS's $217M. FULT is the more profitable business, keeping 20.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HIFS's 13.0%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $217M | $877M | $867M | $1.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $62M | $166M | $241M | $529M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $45M | $126M | $169M | $392M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $30M | $142M | $225M | $267M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +30.1% | +68.3% | +72.1% | +67.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +16.8% | +18.8% | +25.3% | +25.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +13.0% | +14.4% | +19.5% | +20.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.4% | +16.2% | +25.2% | +15.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +195.1% | +19.2% | +39.5% | +47.2% |
Valuation Metrics
FULT leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.3x trailing earnings, FULT trades at a 54% valuation discount to HIFS's 22.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FULT offers better value at 0.74x vs NBTB's 1.92x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $626M | $2.0B | $2.4B | $4.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.8B | $2.2B | $2.5B | $5.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 22.33x | 15.03x | 13.53x | 10.31x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 20.43x | 10.20x | 10.80x | 10.61x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.83x | 1.92x | 0.74x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 47.53x | 13.57x | 10.35x | 9.74x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.88x | 2.31x | 2.71x | 2.18x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.46x | 1.07x | 1.21x | 1.13x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 53.27x | 14.27x | 10.75x | 14.52x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NBTB leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FULT delivers a 11.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $7 for NWBI. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HIFS's 3.47x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NWBI scores 7/9 vs HIFS's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.8% | +7.2% | +9.5% | +11.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.0% | +0.8% | +1.1% | +1.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.4% | +5.6% | +7.9% | +7.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.2% | +6.8% | +2.4% | +9.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 3.47x | 0.24x | 0.17x | 0.37x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.1B | $213M | $142M | $1.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $352M | $234M | $185M | $271M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.5B | $446M | $327M | $1.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.44x | 0.73x | 1.05x | 0.84x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FULT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FULT five years ago would be worth $14,141 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,808 for HIFS. Over the past 12 months, FULT leads with a +29.6% total return vs NBTB's +9.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FULT at 32.1% vs NBTB's 15.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +6.3% | +18.8% | +9.3% | +11.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +14.4% | +18.3% | +9.0% | +29.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +61.9% | +56.2% | +54.1% | +130.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -1.9% | +26.6% | +29.9% | +41.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +142.5% | +52.3% | +102.2% | +106.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +17.4% | +16.0% | +15.5% | +32.1% |
Risk & Volatility
NWBI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NWBI is the less volatile stock with a 0.73 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HIFS's 1.25 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NWBI currently trades 97.0% from its 52-week high vs HIFS's 84.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.25x | 0.73x | 0.89x | 1.13x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $338.00 | $14.26 | $46.92 | $22.99 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $220.76 | $11.25 | $39.20 | $16.60 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +84.9% | +97.0% | +96.1% | +93.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.0 | 64.4 | 57.3 | 55.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 51K | 1.3M | 236K | 2.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NWBI and NBTB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NWBI as "Hold", NBTB as "Hold", FULT as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 11.9% upside for FULT (target: $24) vs 2.1% for NBTB (target: $46). For income investors, NWBI offers the higher dividend yield at 5.42% vs HIFS's 0.87%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $14.67 | $46.00 | $24.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 14 | 10 | 20 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.9% | +5.4% | +3.2% | +3.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 12 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.50 | $0.75 | $1.43 | $0.77 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.4% | +1.6% |
FULT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). NBTB leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
HIFS vs NWBI vs NBTB vs FULT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HIFS or NWBI or NBTB or FULT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Northwest Bancshares, Inc.
(NWBI) is the stronger pick with 16. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 0% for Fulton Financial Corporation (FULT). Fulton Financial Corporation (FULT) offers the better valuation at 10. 3x trailing P/E (10. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Northwest Bancshares, Inc. (NWBI) a "Hold" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HIFS or NWBI or NBTB or FULT?
On trailing P/E, Fulton Financial Corporation (FULT) is the cheapest at 10.
3x versus Hingham Institution for Savings at 22. 3x. On forward P/E, Northwest Bancshares, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fulton Financial Corporation wins at 0. 76x versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 1. 53x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HIFS or NWBI or NBTB or FULT?
Over the past 5 years, Fulton Financial Corporation (FULT) delivered a total return of +41.
4%, compared to -1. 9% for Hingham Institution for Savings (HIFS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HIFS returned +142. 5% versus NWBI's +52. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HIFS or NWBI or NBTB or FULT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Northwest Bancshares, Inc.
(NWBI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 73β versus Hingham Institution for Savings's 1. 25β — meaning HIFS is approximately 71% more volatile than NWBI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 3% for Hingham Institution for Savings — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HIFS or NWBI or NBTB or FULT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Northwest Bancshares, Inc.
(NWBI) is pulling ahead at 16. 3% versus 5. 0% for Fulton Financial Corporation (FULT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Fulton Financial Corporation grew EPS 32. 5% year-over-year, compared to 6. 8% for Hingham Institution for Savings. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HIFS or NWBI or NBTB or FULT?
Fulton Financial Corporation (FULT) is the more profitable company, earning 20.
7% net margin versus 13. 0% for Hingham Institution for Savings — meaning it keeps 20. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FULT leads at 25. 7% versus 16. 8% for HIFS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HIFS or NWBI or NBTB or FULT more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Fulton Financial Corporation (FULT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 76x versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 1. 53x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Northwest Bancshares, Inc. (NWBI) trades at 10. 2x forward P/E versus 20. 4x for Hingham Institution for Savings — 10. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FULT: 11. 9% to $24. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — HIFS or NWBI or NBTB or FULT?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Northwest Bancshares, Inc. (NWBI) offers the highest yield at 5. 4%, versus 0. 9% for Hingham Institution for Savings (HIFS).
09Is HIFS or NWBI or NBTB or FULT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Northwest Bancshares, Inc.
(NWBI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 73), 5. 4% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NWBI: +52. 3%, HIFS: +142. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HIFS and NWBI and NBTB and FULT?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: HIFS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NWBI is a small-cap high-growth stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; FULT is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.