Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
HIFS vs TRST
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
HIFS vs TRST — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $626M | $858M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $217M | $278M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $45M | $61M |
| Gross Margin | 30.1% | 67.1% |
| Operating Margin | 16.8% | 29.2% |
| Forward P/E | 20.4x | 16.9x |
| Total Debt | $1.50B | $193M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $352M | $51M |
HIFS vs TRST — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hingham Institution… (HIFS) | 100 | 174.8 | +74.8% |
| TrustCo Bank Corp NY (TRST) | 100 | 153.7 | +53.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HIFS vs TRST
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HIFS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 14.1%, EPS growth 6.8%
- 142.5% 10Y total return vs TRST's 97.2%
- 14.1% NII/revenue growth vs TRST's 5.8%
TRST carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 0.75, yield 3.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.75, Low D/E 28.1%, current ratio 0.26x
- Beta 0.75, yield 3.1%, current ratio 0.26x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 14.1% NII/revenue growth vs TRST's 5.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.9x vs 20.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs TRST's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.75 vs HIFS's 1.25, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.1% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs HIFS's 0.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +60.3% vs HIFS's +14.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs TRST's 0.4% |
HIFS vs TRST — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
HIFS vs TRST — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TRST leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TRST and HIFS operate at a comparable scale, with $278M and $217M in trailing revenue. TRST is the more profitable business, keeping 22.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HIFS's 13.0%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $217M | $278M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $62M | $90M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $45M | $61M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $30M | $46M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +30.1% | +67.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +16.8% | +29.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +13.0% | +22.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.4% | +16.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +195.1% | +44.1% |
Valuation Metrics
TRST leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.9x trailing earnings, TRST trades at a 33% valuation discount to HIFS's 22.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TRST's 11.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HIFS's 47.5x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $626M | $858M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.8B | $1000M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 22.33x | 14.90x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 20.43x | 16.87x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.11x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 47.53x | 11.14x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.88x | 3.08x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.46x | 1.29x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 53.27x | 18.75x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TRST leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HIFS delivers a 9.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $9 for TRST. TRST carries lower financial leverage with a 0.28x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HIFS's 3.47x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TRST scores 7/9 vs HIFS's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.8% | +8.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.0% | +1.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.4% | +7.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.2% | +2.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 3.47x | 0.28x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.1B | $142M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $352M | $51M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.5B | $193M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.44x | 0.90x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TRST leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TRST five years ago would be worth $14,654 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,808 for HIFS. Over the past 12 months, TRST leads with a +60.3% total return vs HIFS's +14.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TRST at 23.5% vs HIFS's 17.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +6.3% | +18.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +14.4% | +60.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +61.9% | +88.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -1.9% | +46.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +142.5% | +97.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +17.4% | +23.5% |
Risk & Volatility
TRST leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TRST is the less volatile stock with a 0.75 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HIFS's 1.25 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TRST currently trades 98.6% from its 52-week high vs HIFS's 84.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.25x | 0.75x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $338.00 | $49.11 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $220.76 | $30.17 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +84.9% | +98.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.0 | 64.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 51K | 112K |
Analyst Outlook
TRST leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, TRST offers the higher dividend yield at 3.11% vs HIFS's 0.87%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 3 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.9% | +3.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 8 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.50 | $1.51 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +4.4% |
TRST leads in 6 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics.
HIFS vs TRST: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HIFS or TRST a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Hingham Institution for Savings (HIFS) is the stronger pick with 14.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 8% for TrustCo Bank Corp NY (TRST). TrustCo Bank Corp NY (TRST) offers the better valuation at 14. 9x trailing P/E (16. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TrustCo Bank Corp NY (TRST) a "Hold" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HIFS or TRST?
On trailing P/E, TrustCo Bank Corp NY (TRST) is the cheapest at 14.
9x versus Hingham Institution for Savings at 22. 3x. On forward P/E, TrustCo Bank Corp NY is actually cheaper at 16. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HIFS or TRST?
Over the past 5 years, TrustCo Bank Corp NY (TRST) delivered a total return of +46.
5%, compared to -1. 9% for Hingham Institution for Savings (HIFS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HIFS returned +142. 5% versus TRST's +97. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HIFS or TRST?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), TrustCo Bank Corp NY (TRST) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
75β versus Hingham Institution for Savings's 1. 25β — meaning HIFS is approximately 66% more volatile than TRST relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, TrustCo Bank Corp NY (TRST) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 28% versus 3% for Hingham Institution for Savings — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HIFS or TRST?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hingham Institution for Savings (HIFS) is pulling ahead at 14.
1% versus 5. 8% for TrustCo Bank Corp NY (TRST). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TrustCo Bank Corp NY grew EPS 26. 5% year-over-year, compared to 6. 8% for Hingham Institution for Savings. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HIFS or TRST?
TrustCo Bank Corp NY (TRST) is the more profitable company, earning 22.
0% net margin versus 13. 0% for Hingham Institution for Savings — meaning it keeps 22. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TRST leads at 29. 2% versus 16. 8% for HIFS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TRST leads at 67. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HIFS or TRST more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, TrustCo Bank Corp NY (TRST) trades at 16.
9x forward P/E versus 20. 4x for Hingham Institution for Savings — 3. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — HIFS or TRST?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
TrustCo Bank Corp NY (TRST) offers the highest yield at 3. 1%, versus 0. 9% for Hingham Institution for Savings (HIFS).
09Is HIFS or TRST better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, TrustCo Bank Corp NY (TRST) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
75), 3. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TRST: +97. 2%, HIFS: +142. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HIFS and TRST?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: HIFS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TRST is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.