Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

HIHO vs FLXS vs DAKT vs LYTS vs LESL

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
HIHO
Highway Holdings Limited

Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication

IndustrialsNASDAQ • HK
Market Cap$3M
5Y Perf.-79.0%
FLXS
Flexsteel Industries, Inc.

Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$299M
5Y Perf.+99.8%
DAKT
Daktronics, Inc.

Hardware, Equipment & Parts

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.00B
5Y Perf.+426.4%
LYTS
LSI Industries Inc.

Hardware, Equipment & Parts

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$765M
5Y Perf.+259.1%
LESL
Leslie's, Inc.

Home Improvement

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$15M
5Y Perf.-99.6%

HIHO vs FLXS vs DAKT vs LYTS vs LESL — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
HIHO logoHIHO
FLXS logoFLXS
DAKT logoDAKT
LYTS logoLYTS
LESL logoLESL
IndustryManufacturing - Metal FabricationFurnishings, Fixtures & AppliancesHardware, Equipment & PartsHardware, Equipment & PartsHome Improvement
Market Cap$3M$299M$1.00B$765M$15M
Revenue (TTM)$6M$458M$803M$592M$1.21B
Net Income (TTM)$-535K$22M$28M$26M$-275M
Gross Margin29.4%23.2%26.6%25.3%34.5%
Operating Margin-21.6%6.1%5.6%6.5%-0.2%
Forward P/E32.5x11.8x22.1x22.5x
Total Debt$810K$59M$17M$67M$1.01B
Cash & Equiv.$6M$40M$128M$3M$64M

HIHO vs FLXS vs DAKT vs LYTS vs LESLLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

HIHO
FLXS
DAKT
LYTS
LESL
StockOct 20May 26Return
Highway Holdings Li… (HIHO)10021.0-79.0%
Flexsteel Industrie… (FLXS)100199.8+99.8%
Daktronics, Inc. (DAKT)100526.4+426.4%
LSI Industries Inc. (LYTS)100359.1+259.1%
Leslie's, Inc. (LESL)1000.4-99.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: HIHO vs FLXS vs DAKT vs LYTS vs LESL

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: FLXS leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Highway Holdings Limited is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and dividend income and shareholder returns. LYTS also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
HIHO
Highway Holdings Limited
The Income Pick

HIHO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.64, yield 14.3%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.64, Low D/E 12.9%, current ratio 2.79x
  • Beta 0.64, yield 14.3%, current ratio 2.79x
  • Beta 0.64 vs LESL's 2.31
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
FLXS
Flexsteel Industries, Inc.
The Value Play

FLXS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.

  • Better valuation composite
  • 4.8% margin vs LESL's -22.7%
  • +77.1% vs LESL's -88.5%
  • 7.5% ROA vs LESL's -42.4%, ROIC 9.9% vs 1.6%
Best for: value and quality
DAKT
Daktronics, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

DAKT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 162.3% 10Y total return vs LYTS's 109.6%
Best for: long-term compounding
LYTS
LSI Industries Inc.
The Growth Play

LYTS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 22.1%, EPS growth -4.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.0%
  • 22.1% revenue growth vs DAKT's -7.5%
Best for: growth exposure
LESL
Leslie's, Inc.
The Consumer Cyclical Pick

Among these 5 stocks, LESL doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: consumer cyclical exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthLYTS logoLYTS22.1% revenue growth vs DAKT's -7.5%
ValueFLXS logoFLXSBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsFLXS logoFLXS4.8% margin vs LESL's -22.7%
Stability / SafetyHIHO logoHIHOBeta 0.64 vs LESL's 2.31
DividendsHIHO logoHIHO14.3% yield, vs LYTS's 0.8%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)FLXS logoFLXS+77.1% vs LESL's -88.5%
Efficiency (ROA)FLXS logoFLXS7.5% ROA vs LESL's -42.4%, ROIC 9.9% vs 1.6%

HIHO vs FLXS vs DAKT vs LYTS vs LESL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

HIHOHighway Holdings Limited
FY 2023
Electric Member
100.0%$4M
FLXSFlexsteel Industries, Inc.
FY 2023
Residential
100.0%$394M
DAKTDaktronics, Inc.
FY 2024
Unique Configuration
51.7%$423M
Limited Configuration
40.0%$327M
Service and Other
8.3%$68M
LYTSLSI Industries Inc.
FY 2025
Display Solutions Segment
56.7%$325M
Lighting Segment
43.3%$248M
LESLLeslie's, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

HIHO vs FLXS vs DAKT vs LYTS vs LESL — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLDAKTLAGGINGLESL

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

DAKT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

LESL is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.2B annually — 197.6x HIHO's $6M. FLXS is the more profitable business, keeping 4.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LESL's -22.7%. On growth, DAKT holds the edge at +21.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricHIHO logoHIHOHighway Holdings …FLXS logoFLXSFlexsteel Industr…DAKT logoDAKTDaktronics, Inc.LYTS logoLYTSLSI Industries In…LESL logoLESLLeslie's, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$6M$458M$803M$592M$1.2B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$653,000$31M$65M$51M$6M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$535,000$22M$28M$26M-$275M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$0$28M$62M$38M$8M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+29.4%+23.2%+26.6%+25.3%+34.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-21.6%+6.1%+5.6%+6.5%-0.2%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-8.7%+4.8%+3.4%+4.3%-22.7%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-6.2%+6.1%+7.7%+6.4%+0.6%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-44.3%+9.8%+21.6%-0.5%-16.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-2.5%-27.2%+117.0%+11.1%-85.8%
DAKT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — HIHO and FLXS each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 15.7x trailing earnings, FLXS trades at a 52% valuation discount to HIHO's 32.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, FLXS's 10.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LESL's 20.3x.

MetricHIHO logoHIHOHighway Holdings …FLXS logoFLXSFlexsteel Industr…DAKT logoDAKTDaktronics, Inc.LYTS logoLYTSLSI Industries In…LESL logoLESLLeslie's, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$3M$299M$1.0B$765M$15M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash-$2M$318M$890M$828M$963M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS32.49x15.73x-97.76x31.09x-0.06x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.11.79x22.08x22.46x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.83x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple-23.17x10.50x16.90x17.12x20.29x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.47x0.68x1.32x1.33x0.01x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.55x1.89x3.59x3.28x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF8.85x12.79x22.07x
Evenly matched — HIHO and FLXS each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

FLXS leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

FLXS delivers a 12.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-9 for HIHO. DAKT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FLXS's 0.35x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FLXS scores 8/9 vs LESL's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricHIHO logoHIHOHighway Holdings …FLXS logoFLXSFlexsteel Industr…DAKT logoDAKTDaktronics, Inc.LYTS logoLYTSLSI Industries In…LESL logoLESLLeslie's, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-9.0%+12.2%+9.6%+10.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-6.4%+7.5%+5.1%+6.5%-42.4%
ROICReturn on invested capital-31.7%+9.9%+13.2%+9.5%+1.6%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-7.7%+12.3%+9.9%+12.6%+2.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–968454
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.13x0.35x0.06x0.29x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$5M$19M-$111M$63M$948M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$6M$40M$128M$3M$64M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$810,000$59M$17M$67M$1.0B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense380.21x37.31x13.52x-3.06x
FLXS leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

DAKT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in LYTS five years ago would be worth $32,769 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $29 for LESL. Over the past 12 months, FLXS leads with a +77.1% total return vs LESL's -88.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DAKT at 59.2% vs LESL's -80.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricHIHO logoHIHOHighway Holdings …FLXS logoFLXSFlexsteel Industr…DAKT logoDAKTDaktronics, Inc.LYTS logoLYTSLSI Industries In…LESL logoLESLLeslie's, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-42.8%+40.4%+3.5%+33.5%-6.9%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-56.5%+77.1%+47.2%+53.9%-88.5%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-46.0%+246.5%+303.3%+101.1%-99.3%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-57.3%+29.5%+220.3%+227.7%-99.7%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-41.3%+53.0%+162.3%+109.6%-99.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-18.6%+51.3%+59.2%+26.2%-80.6%
DAKT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — HIHO and LYTS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

HIHO is the less volatile stock with a 0.64 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LESL's 2.31 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LYTS currently trades 99.2% from its 52-week high vs LESL's 8.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricHIHO logoHIHOHighway Holdings …FLXS logoFLXSFlexsteel Industr…DAKT logoDAKTDaktronics, Inc.LYTS logoLYTSLSI Industries In…LESL logoLESLLeslie's, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.64x1.45x1.49x1.40x2.31x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$2.21$59.95$28.27$24.75$18.56
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.74$29.38$13.05$15.31$0.87
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+35.4%+93.1%+72.6%+99.2%+8.7%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10045.260.751.670.744.0
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded60K47K444K375K134K
Evenly matched — HIHO and LYTS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — HIHO and LYTS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: DAKT as "Buy", LYTS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 9.9% upside for LYTS (target: $27) vs -3.3% for FLXS (target: $54). For income investors, HIHO offers the higher dividend yield at 14.27% vs LYTS's 0.79%.

MetricHIHO logoHIHOHighway Holdings …FLXS logoFLXSFlexsteel Industr…DAKT logoDAKTDaktronics, Inc.LYTS logoLYTSLSI Industries In…LESL logoLESLLeslie's, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$54.00$27.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts45
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+14.3%+1.1%+0.8%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises01021
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.11$0.63$0.19
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+0.9%+2.9%0.0%0.0%
Evenly matched — HIHO and LYTS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

DAKT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). FLXS leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.

Best OverallDaktronics, Inc. (DAKT)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

HIHO vs FLXS vs DAKT vs LYTS vs LESL: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is HIHO or FLXS or DAKT or LYTS or LESL a better buy right now?

For growth investors, LSI Industries Inc.

(LYTS) is the stronger pick with 22. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 5% for Daktronics, Inc. (DAKT). Flexsteel Industries, Inc. (FLXS) offers the better valuation at 15. 7x trailing P/E (11. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Daktronics, Inc. (DAKT) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — HIHO or FLXS or DAKT or LYTS or LESL?

On trailing P/E, Flexsteel Industries, Inc.

(FLXS) is the cheapest at 15. 7x versus Highway Holdings Limited at 32. 5x. On forward P/E, Flexsteel Industries, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 8x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — HIHO or FLXS or DAKT or LYTS or LESL?

Over the past 5 years, LSI Industries Inc.

(LYTS) delivered a total return of +227. 7%, compared to -99. 7% for Leslie's, Inc. (LESL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DAKT returned +162. 3% versus LESL's -99. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — HIHO or FLXS or DAKT or LYTS or LESL?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Highway Holdings Limited (HIHO) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

64β versus Leslie's, Inc. 's 2. 31β — meaning LESL is approximately 260% more volatile than HIHO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Daktronics, Inc. (DAKT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 35% for Flexsteel Industries, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — HIHO or FLXS or DAKT or LYTS or LESL?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), LSI Industries Inc.

(LYTS) is pulling ahead at 22. 1% versus -7. 5% for Daktronics, Inc. (DAKT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Highway Holdings Limited grew EPS 111. 0% year-over-year, compared to -881. 2% for Leslie's, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LYTS leads at 8. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — HIHO or FLXS or DAKT or LYTS or LESL?

Flexsteel Industries, Inc.

(FLXS) is the more profitable company, earning 4. 6% net margin versus -19. 1% for Leslie's, Inc. — meaning it keeps 4. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LYTS leads at 6. 2% versus -7. 2% for HIHO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LESL leads at 35. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is HIHO or FLXS or DAKT or LYTS or LESL more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Flexsteel Industries, Inc.

(FLXS) trades at 11. 8x forward P/E versus 22. 5x for LSI Industries Inc. — 10. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LYTS: 9. 9% to $27. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — HIHO or FLXS or DAKT or LYTS or LESL?

In this comparison, HIHO (14.

3% yield), FLXS (1. 1% yield), LYTS (0. 8% yield) pay a dividend. DAKT, LESL do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is HIHO or FLXS or DAKT or LYTS or LESL better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Highway Holdings Limited (HIHO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

64), 14. 3% yield). Leslie's, Inc. (LESL) carries a higher beta of 2. 31 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HIHO: -41. 3%, LESL: -99. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between HIHO and FLXS and DAKT and LYTS and LESL?

These companies operate in different sectors (HIHO (Industrials) and FLXS (Consumer Cyclical) and DAKT (Technology) and LYTS (Technology) and LESL (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: HIHO is a small-cap high-growth stock; FLXS is a small-cap deep-value stock; DAKT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LYTS is a small-cap high-growth stock; LESL is a small-cap quality compounder stock. HIHO, FLXS, LYTS pay a dividend while DAKT, LESL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

HIHO

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 17%
  • Dividend Yield > 5.7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FLXS

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

DAKT

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 10%
  • Gross Margin > 15%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

LYTS

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 15%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

LESL

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 20%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform HIHO and FLXS and DAKT and LYTS and LESL on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(HIHO: -44.3% · FLXS: 9.8%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(HIHO: 32.5x · FLXS: 15.7x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.