Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
HIHO vs FLXS vs ETH vs DAKT vs LYTS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Asset Management - Cryptocurrency
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
HIHO vs FLXS vs ETH vs DAKT vs LYTS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | Asset Management - Cryptocurrency | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Hardware, Equipment & Parts |
| Market Cap | $3M | $299M | $560M | $1.00B | $765M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6M | $458M | $615M | $803M | $592M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-535K | $22M | $47M | $28M | $26M |
| Gross Margin | 29.4% | 23.2% | 60.5% | 26.6% | 25.3% |
| Operating Margin | -21.6% | 6.1% | 10.1% | 5.6% | 6.5% |
| Forward P/E | 32.5x | 11.8x | 8.6x | 22.1x | 22.5x |
| Total Debt | $810K | $59M | $124M | $17M | $67M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6M | $40M | $76M | $128M | $3M |
HIHO vs FLXS vs ETH vs DAKT vs LYTS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Highway Holdings Li… (HIHO) | 100 | 42.8 | -57.2% |
| Flexsteel Industrie… (FLXS) | 100 | 147.1 | +47.1% |
| Grayscale Ethereum … (ETH) | 100 | 71.4 | -28.6% |
| Daktronics, Inc. (DAKT) | 100 | 137.0 | +37.0% |
| LSI Industries Inc. (LYTS) | 100 | 144.0 | +44.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HIHO vs FLXS vs ETH vs DAKT vs LYTS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HIHO has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.64, yield 14.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.64, Low D/E 12.9%, current ratio 2.79x
- Beta 0.64, yield 14.3%, current ratio 2.79x
- Beta 0.64 vs ETH's 2.83, lower leverage
FLXS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum and efficiency is your priority.
- +77.1% vs HIHO's -56.5%
- 7.5% ROA vs HIHO's -6.4%, ROIC 9.9% vs -31.7%
ETH ranks third and is worth considering specifically for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.20 vs LYTS's 1.32
- Lower P/E (8.6x vs 22.5x), PEG 0.20 vs 1.32
- 8.4% margin vs HIHO's -8.7%
DAKT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 162.3% 10Y total return vs LYTS's 109.6%
LYTS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 22.1%, EPS growth -4.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.0%
- 22.1% revenue growth vs DAKT's -7.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 22.1% revenue growth vs DAKT's -7.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.6x vs 22.5x), PEG 0.20 vs 1.32 | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.4% margin vs HIHO's -8.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.64 vs ETH's 2.83, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 14.3% yield, vs LYTS's 0.8%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +77.1% vs HIHO's -56.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.5% ROA vs HIHO's -6.4%, ROIC 9.9% vs -31.7% |
HIHO vs FLXS vs ETH vs DAKT vs LYTS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
HIHO vs FLXS vs ETH vs DAKT vs LYTS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HIHO leads in 1 of 6 categories
DAKT leads 1 • FLXS leads 0 • ETH leads 0 • LYTS leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — ETH and DAKT each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DAKT is the larger business by revenue, generating $803M annually — 130.7x HIHO's $6M. ETH is the more profitable business, keeping 8.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HIHO's -8.7%. On growth, DAKT holds the edge at +21.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6M | $458M | $615M | $803M | $592M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$653,000 | $31M | $70M | $65M | $51M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$535,000 | $22M | $47M | $28M | $26M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | $28M | $20M | $62M | $38M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +29.4% | +23.2% | +60.5% | +26.6% | +25.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -21.6% | +6.1% | +10.1% | +5.6% | +6.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -8.7% | +4.8% | +8.4% | +3.4% | +4.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -6.2% | +6.1% | +0.0% | +7.7% | +6.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -44.3% | +9.8% | — | +21.6% | -0.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.5% | -27.2% | -28.1% | +117.0% | +11.1% |
Valuation Metrics
HIHO leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.9x trailing earnings, ETH trades at a 66% valuation discount to HIHO's 32.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ETH offers better value at 0.26x vs LYTS's 1.83x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3M | $299M | $560M | $1.0B | $765M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$2M | $318M | $607M | $890M | $828M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 32.49x | 15.73x | 10.94x | -97.76x | 31.09x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 11.79x | 8.62x | 22.08x | 22.46x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.26x | — | 1.83x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | -23.17x | 10.50x | 9.79x | 16.90x | 17.12x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.47x | 0.68x | 0.91x | 1.32x | 1.33x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.55x | 1.89x | 1.17x | 3.59x | 3.28x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 8.85x | 9999.00x | 12.79x | 22.07x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — FLXS and DAKT each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FLXS delivers a 12.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-9 for HIHO. DAKT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FLXS's 0.35x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FLXS scores 8/9 vs DAKT's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -9.0% | +12.2% | +10.0% | +9.6% | +10.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -6.4% | +7.5% | +6.4% | +5.1% | +6.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -31.7% | +9.9% | +7.6% | +13.2% | +9.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -7.7% | +12.3% | +10.5% | +9.9% | +12.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.13x | 0.35x | 0.26x | 0.06x | 0.29x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$5M | $19M | $47M | -$111M | $63M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6M | $40M | $76M | $128M | $3M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $810,000 | $59M | $124M | $17M | $67M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 380.21x | 721.00x | 37.31x | 13.52x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
DAKT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LYTS five years ago would be worth $32,769 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,274 for HIHO. Over the past 12 months, FLXS leads with a +77.1% total return vs HIHO's -56.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DAKT at 59.2% vs HIHO's -18.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -42.8% | +40.4% | -25.4% | +3.5% | +33.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -56.5% | +77.1% | +10.2% | +47.2% | +53.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -46.0% | +246.5% | -32.8% | +303.3% | +101.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -57.3% | +29.5% | -29.7% | +220.3% | +227.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -41.3% | +53.0% | -18.2% | +162.3% | +109.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -18.6% | +51.3% | -12.4% | +59.2% | +26.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HIHO and LYTS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HIHO is the less volatile stock with a 0.64 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ETH's 2.83 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LYTS currently trades 99.2% from its 52-week high vs HIHO's 35.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.64x | 1.45x | 2.83x | 1.49x | 1.40x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.21 | $59.95 | $45.78 | $28.27 | $24.75 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.74 | $29.38 | $17.07 | $13.05 | $15.31 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +35.4% | +93.1% | +48.0% | +72.6% | +99.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.2 | 60.7 | 51.4 | 51.6 | 70.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 60K | 47K | 4.5M | 444K | 375K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — HIHO and LYTS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ETH as "Hold", DAKT as "Buy", LYTS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 9.9% upside for LYTS (target: $27) vs -3.3% for FLXS (target: $54). For income investors, HIHO offers the higher dividend yield at 14.27% vs LYTS's 0.79%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $54.00 | — | — | $27.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 10 | 4 | 5 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +14.3% | +1.1% | +0.0% | — | +0.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.11 | $0.63 | $0.00 | — | $0.19 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.9% | 0.0% | +2.9% | 0.0% |
HIHO leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). DAKT leads in 1 (Total Returns). 4 tied.
HIHO vs FLXS vs ETH vs DAKT vs LYTS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HIHO or FLXS or ETH or DAKT or LYTS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, LSI Industries Inc.
(LYTS) is the stronger pick with 22. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 5% for Daktronics, Inc. (DAKT). Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust (ETH) offers the better valuation at 10. 9x trailing P/E (8. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Daktronics, Inc. (DAKT) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HIHO or FLXS or ETH or DAKT or LYTS?
On trailing P/E, Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust (ETH) is the cheapest at 10.
9x versus Highway Holdings Limited at 32. 5x. On forward P/E, Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust is actually cheaper at 8. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust wins at 0. 20x versus LSI Industries Inc. 's 1. 32x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HIHO or FLXS or ETH or DAKT or LYTS?
Over the past 5 years, LSI Industries Inc.
(LYTS) delivered a total return of +227. 7%, compared to -57. 3% for Highway Holdings Limited (HIHO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DAKT returned +162. 3% versus HIHO's -41. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HIHO or FLXS or ETH or DAKT or LYTS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Highway Holdings Limited (HIHO) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
64β versus Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust's 2. 83β — meaning ETH is approximately 342% more volatile than HIHO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Daktronics, Inc. (DAKT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 35% for Flexsteel Industries, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HIHO or FLXS or ETH or DAKT or LYTS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), LSI Industries Inc.
(LYTS) is pulling ahead at 22. 1% versus -7. 5% for Daktronics, Inc. (DAKT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Highway Holdings Limited grew EPS 111. 0% year-over-year, compared to -128. 4% for Daktronics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LYTS leads at 8. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HIHO or FLXS or ETH or DAKT or LYTS?
Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust (ETH) is the more profitable company, earning 8.
4% net margin versus -1. 3% for Daktronics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ETH leads at 10. 1% versus -7. 2% for HIHO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ETH leads at 60. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HIHO or FLXS or ETH or DAKT or LYTS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust (ETH) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 20x versus LSI Industries Inc. 's 1. 32x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust (ETH) trades at 8. 6x forward P/E versus 22. 5x for LSI Industries Inc. — 13. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LYTS: 9. 9% to $27. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — HIHO or FLXS or ETH or DAKT or LYTS?
In this comparison, HIHO (14.
3% yield), FLXS (1. 1% yield), LYTS (0. 8% yield) pay a dividend. ETH, DAKT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is HIHO or FLXS or ETH or DAKT or LYTS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Highway Holdings Limited (HIHO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
64), 14. 3% yield). Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust (ETH) carries a higher beta of 2. 83 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HIHO: -41. 3%, ETH: -18. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HIHO and FLXS and ETH and DAKT and LYTS?
These companies operate in different sectors (HIHO (Industrials) and FLXS (Consumer Cyclical) and ETH (Financial Services) and DAKT (Technology) and LYTS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: HIHO is a small-cap high-growth stock; FLXS is a small-cap deep-value stock; ETH is a small-cap deep-value stock; DAKT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LYTS is a small-cap high-growth stock. HIHO, FLXS, LYTS pay a dividend while ETH, DAKT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.