DAKT vs OLED

For growth investors, Universal Display Corporation (OLED) is the stronger pick with 0.

5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 5% for Daktronics, Inc. (DAKT). Universal Display Corporation (OLED) offers the better valuation at 18. 5x trailing P/E (19. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Daktronics, Inc. (DAKT) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On forward P/E, Universal Display Corporation is actually cheaper at 19.

7x.

Over the past 5 years, Daktronics, Inc.

(DAKT) delivered a total return of +211. 2%, compared to -53. 7% for Universal Display Corporation (OLED). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DAKT returned +157. 3% versus OLED's +83. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Universal Display Corporation (OLED) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

39β versus Daktronics, Inc. 's 1. 48β — meaning DAKT is approximately 7% more volatile than OLED relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Universal Display Corporation (OLED) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 6% for Daktronics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Universal Display Corporation (OLED) is pulling ahead at 0.

5% versus -7. 5% for Daktronics, Inc. (DAKT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Universal Display Corporation grew EPS 9. 2% year-over-year, compared to -128. 4% for Daktronics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, DAKT leads at 7. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Universal Display Corporation (OLED) is the more profitable company, earning 37.

2% net margin versus -1. 3% for Daktronics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 37. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: OLED leads at 38. 5% versus 4. 4% for DAKT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — OLED leads at 73. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Universal Display Corporation (OLED) trades at 19.

7x forward P/E versus 21. 6x for Daktronics, Inc. — 1. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.

In this comparison, OLED (1.

9% yield) pays a dividend. DAKT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Universal Display Corporation (OLED) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1.

9% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (OLED: +83. 9%, DAKT: +157. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

OLED pays a dividend while DAKT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.