Aerospace & Defense
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
HII vs BA vs RTX vs GD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Aerospace & Defense
Aerospace & Defense
Aerospace & Defense
HII vs BA vs RTX vs GD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Aerospace & Defense | Aerospace & Defense | Aerospace & Defense |
| Market Cap | $12.39B | $182.12B | $238.07B | $94.02B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $12.85B | $92.18B | $90.37B | $53.81B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $605M | $2.27B | $7.26B | $4.34B |
| Gross Margin | 12.4% | 4.8% | 20.2% | 15.2% |
| Operating Margin | 4.9% | -5.9% | 10.4% | 10.2% |
| Forward P/E | 18.2x | 4979.1x | 25.5x | 21.1x |
| Total Debt | $3.15B | $54.43B | $39.51B | $9.79B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $774M | $10.92B | $7.43B | $2.33B |
HII vs BA vs RTX vs GD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Huntington Ingalls … (HII) | 100 | 157.4 | +57.4% |
| The Boeing Company (BA) | 100 | 158.4 | +58.4% |
| RTX Corporation (RTX) | 100 | 274.0 | +174.0% |
| General Dynamics Co… (GD) | 100 | 236.8 | +136.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HII vs BA vs RTX vs GD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HII has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability.
- Dividend streak 13 yrs, beta 0.69, yield 1.7%
- Lower P/E (18.2x vs 21.1x)
- 1.7% yield, 13-year raise streak, vs GD's 1.7%
BA is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 34.5%, EPS growth 113.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.3%
- 34.5% revenue growth vs HII's 8.2%
RTX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 234.7% 10Y total return vs GD's 175.5%
- Beta 0.51 vs BA's 0.97, lower leverage
- +40.8% vs BA's +24.5%
GD is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.56, Low D/E 38.2%, current ratio 1.44x
- Beta 0.56, yield 1.7%, current ratio 1.44x
- 8.1% margin vs BA's 2.5%
- 7.5% ROA vs BA's 1.4%, ROIC 12.5% vs -9.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 34.5% revenue growth vs HII's 8.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (18.2x vs 21.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.1% margin vs BA's 2.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.51 vs BA's 0.97, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.7% yield, 13-year raise streak, vs GD's 1.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +40.8% vs BA's +24.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.5% ROA vs BA's 1.4%, ROIC 12.5% vs -9.5% |
HII vs BA vs RTX vs GD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
HII vs BA vs RTX vs GD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
RTX leads in 2 of 6 categories
HII leads 2 • GD leads 1 • BA leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RTX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BA is the larger business by revenue, generating $92.2B annually — 7.2x HII's $12.8B. GD is the more profitable business, keeping 8.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BA's 2.5%. On growth, BA holds the edge at +14.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $12.8B | $92.2B | $90.4B | $53.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $953M | -$3.4B | $13.8B | $6.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $605M | $2.3B | $7.3B | $4.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.1B | -$1.0B | $8.4B | $6.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +12.4% | +4.8% | +20.2% | +15.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.9% | -5.9% | +10.4% | +10.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.7% | +2.5% | +8.0% | +8.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +8.2% | -1.1% | +9.2% | +11.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +13.4% | +14.0% | +8.7% | +10.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | 0.0% | +31.3% | +32.5% | +12.0% |
Valuation Metrics
HII leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 20.4x trailing earnings, HII trades at a 78% valuation discount to BA's 93.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, HII's 15.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than RTX's 21.0x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $12.4B | $182.1B | $238.1B | $94.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $14.8B | $225.6B | $270.1B | $101.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 20.45x | 93.16x | 35.64x | 22.49x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 18.15x | 4979.09x | 25.54x | 21.08x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 3.19x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 15.76x | — | 20.96x | 16.81x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.99x | 2.04x | 2.69x | 1.79x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.44x | 32.27x | 3.57x | 3.72x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 15.61x | — | 29.98x | 23.75x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GD leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BA delivers a 2.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $3 in annual profit, vs $11 for RTX. GD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.38x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BA's 9.97x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HII scores 9/9 vs BA's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.0% | +2.9% | +10.9% | +17.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.9% | +1.4% | +4.3% | +7.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.2% | -9.5% | +6.7% | +12.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.4% | -9.1% | +7.9% | +13.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 9 | 6 | 8 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.62x | 9.97x | 0.59x | 0.38x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.4B | $43.5B | $32.1B | $7.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $774M | $10.9B | $7.4B | $2.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.1B | $54.4B | $39.5B | $9.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 8.86x | 1.89x | 5.58x | 18.94x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RTX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RTX five years ago would be worth $22,007 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,811 for BA. Over the past 12 months, RTX leads with a +40.8% total return vs BA's +24.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RTX at 24.5% vs BA's 5.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -9.6% | +1.4% | -5.2% | +2.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +39.1% | +24.5% | +40.8% | +31.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +70.2% | +17.1% | +93.0% | +73.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +56.7% | -1.9% | +120.1% | +92.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +130.7% | +94.6% | +234.7% | +175.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +19.4% | +5.4% | +24.5% | +20.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — RTX and GD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RTX is the less volatile stock with a 0.51 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BA's 0.97 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GD currently trades 94.0% from its 52-week high vs HII's 68.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.69x | 0.97x | 0.51x | 0.56x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $460.00 | $254.35 | $214.50 | $369.70 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $215.05 | $176.77 | $126.03 | $267.39 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +68.4% | +90.8% | +82.4% | +94.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 21.9 | 56.9 | 37.3 | 57.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 476K | 6.5M | 5.3M | 1.3M |
Analyst Outlook
HII leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HII as "Hold", BA as "Buy", RTX as "Buy", GD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 33.5% upside for HII (target: $420) vs 14.1% for BA (target: $264). For income investors, HII offers the higher dividend yield at 1.72% vs BA's 0.19%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $420.00 | $263.67 | $224.89 | $408.83 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 27 | 54 | 26 | 34 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.7% | +0.2% | +1.5% | +1.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 13 | 0 | 4 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $5.42 | $0.43 | $2.63 | $5.82 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.0% | +0.7% |
RTX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). HII leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
HII vs BA vs RTX vs GD: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HII or BA or RTX or GD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, The Boeing Company (BA) is the stronger pick with 34.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 8. 2% for Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. (HII). Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. (HII) offers the better valuation at 20. 4x trailing P/E (18. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Boeing Company (BA) a "Buy" — based on 54 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HII or BA or RTX or GD?
On trailing P/E, Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.
(HII) is the cheapest at 20. 4x versus The Boeing Company at 93. 2x. On forward P/E, Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. is actually cheaper at 18. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HII or BA or RTX or GD?
Over the past 5 years, RTX Corporation (RTX) delivered a total return of +120.
1%, compared to -1. 9% for The Boeing Company (BA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RTX returned +234. 7% versus BA's +94. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HII or BA or RTX or GD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), RTX Corporation (RTX) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
51β versus The Boeing Company's 0. 97β — meaning BA is approximately 90% more volatile than RTX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, General Dynamics Corporation (GD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 38% versus 10% for The Boeing Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HII or BA or RTX or GD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Boeing Company (BA) is pulling ahead at 34.
5% versus 8. 2% for Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. (HII). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Boeing Company grew EPS 113. 5% year-over-year, compared to 10. 2% for Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BA leads at 10. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HII or BA or RTX or GD?
General Dynamics Corporation (GD) is the more profitable company, earning 8.
0% net margin versus 2. 5% for The Boeing Company — meaning it keeps 8. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GD leads at 10. 2% versus -6. 1% for BA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RTX leads at 20. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HII or BA or RTX or GD more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.
(HII) trades at 18. 2x forward P/E versus 4979. 1x for The Boeing Company — 4960. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HII: 33. 5% to $420. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — HII or BA or RTX or GD?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. (HII) offers the highest yield at 1. 7%, versus 0. 2% for The Boeing Company (BA).
09Is HII or BA or RTX or GD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, RTX Corporation (RTX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
51), 1. 5% yield, +234. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (RTX: +234. 7%, BA: +94. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HII and BA and RTX and GD?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: HII is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; BA is a mid-cap high-growth stock; RTX is a large-cap quality compounder stock; GD is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. HII, RTX, GD pay a dividend while BA does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.