Medical - Equipment & Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
HIMS vs NVO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Drug Manufacturers - General
HIMS vs NVO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Equipment & Services | Drug Manufacturers - General |
| Market Cap | $6.94B | $203.36B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.35B | $309.06B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $128M | $102.43B |
| Gross Margin | 69.7% | 81.0% |
| Operating Margin | 4.6% | 41.3% |
| Forward P/E | 53.9x | 2.1x |
| Total Debt | $1.12B | $130.96B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $229M | $26.46B |
HIMS vs NVO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hims & Hers Health,… (HIMS) | 100 | 270.6 | +170.6% |
| Novo Nordisk A/S (NVO) | 100 | 138.8 | +38.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HIMS vs NVO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HIMS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 59.0%, EPS growth -3.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 64.5%
- 174.3% 10Y total return vs NVO's 105.1%
- 59.0% revenue growth vs NVO's 6.4%
NVO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 1.56, yield 4.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.56, Low D/E 67.5%, current ratio 0.80x
- Beta 1.56, yield 4.0%, current ratio 0.80x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 59.0% revenue growth vs NVO's 6.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (2.1x vs 53.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 33.1% margin vs HIMS's 5.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.56 vs HIMS's 2.40, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.0% yield; 8-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -28.2% vs HIMS's -45.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 20.2% ROA vs HIMS's 6.0%, ROIC 36.2% vs 10.7% |
HIMS vs NVO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NVO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NVO is the larger business by revenue, generating $309.1B annually — 131.6x HIMS's $2.3B. NVO is the more profitable business, keeping 33.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HIMS's 5.5%. On growth, HIMS holds the edge at +28.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.3B | $309.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $164M | $149.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $128M | $102.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $73M | $29.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +69.7% | +81.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.6% | +41.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.5% | +33.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.1% | +9.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +28.4% | -7.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -27.3% | -4.6% |
Valuation Metrics
NVO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.7x trailing earnings, NVO trades at a 76% valuation discount to HIMS's 52.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NVO's 9.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HIMS's 44.5x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $6.9B | $203.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7.8B | $219.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 52.71x | 12.65x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 53.94x | 2.14x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.61x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 44.46x | 9.35x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.96x | 4.19x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 12.83x | 6.68x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 93.85x | 44.67x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NVO leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NVO delivers a 61.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $61 in annual profit, vs $24 for HIMS. NVO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.67x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HIMS's 2.07x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NVO scores 5/9 vs HIMS's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +23.7% | +61.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.0% | +20.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.7% | +36.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.9% | +44.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.07x | 0.67x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $892M | $104.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $229M | $26.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.1B | $131.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 13.45x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HIMS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HIMS five years ago would be worth $25,051 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,900 for NVO. Over the past 12 months, NVO leads with a -28.2% total return vs HIMS's -45.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HIMS at 31.4% vs NVO's -16.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -19.5% | -10.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -45.7% | -28.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +126.8% | -40.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +150.5% | +39.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +174.3% | +105.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +31.4% | -16.0% |
Risk & Volatility
NVO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NVO is the less volatile stock with a 1.56 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HIMS's 2.40 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NVO currently trades 56.2% from its 52-week high vs HIMS's 38.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.40x | 1.56x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $70.43 | $81.44 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $13.74 | $35.12 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +38.2% | +56.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.8 | 71.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 35.4M | 19.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates HIMS as "Hold" and NVO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 10.4% upside for HIMS (target: $30) vs 2.7% for NVO (target: $47). NVO is the only dividend payer here at 3.99% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $29.67 | $47.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 19 | 39 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +4.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 8 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $11.64 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.3% | +0.1% |
NVO leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). HIMS leads in 1 (Total Returns).
HIMS vs NVO: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HIMS or NVO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) is the stronger pick with 59. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 4% for Novo Nordisk A/S (NVO). Novo Nordisk A/S (NVO) offers the better valuation at 12. 7x trailing P/E (2. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Novo Nordisk A/S (NVO) a "Buy" — based on 39 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HIMS or NVO?
On trailing P/E, Novo Nordisk A/S (NVO) is the cheapest at 12.
7x versus Hims & Hers Health, Inc. at 52. 7x. On forward P/E, Novo Nordisk A/S is actually cheaper at 2. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HIMS or NVO?
Over the past 5 years, Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) delivered a total return of +150. 5%, compared to +39. 0% for Novo Nordisk A/S (NVO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HIMS returned +174. 3% versus NVO's +105. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HIMS or NVO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Novo Nordisk A/S (NVO) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
56β versus Hims & Hers Health, Inc. 's 2. 40β — meaning HIMS is approximately 54% more volatile than NVO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Novo Nordisk A/S (NVO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 67% versus 2% for Hims & Hers Health, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HIMS or NVO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) is pulling ahead at 59. 0% versus 6. 4% for Novo Nordisk A/S (NVO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Novo Nordisk A/S grew EPS 1. 8% year-over-year, compared to -3. 8% for Hims & Hers Health, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HIMS leads at 64. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HIMS or NVO?
Novo Nordisk A/S (NVO) is the more profitable company, earning 33.
1% net margin versus 5. 5% for Hims & Hers Health, Inc. — meaning it keeps 33. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NVO leads at 41. 3% versus 5. 2% for HIMS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NVO leads at 81. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HIMS or NVO more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Novo Nordisk A/S (NVO) trades at 2.
1x forward P/E versus 53. 9x for Hims & Hers Health, Inc. — 51. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HIMS: 10. 4% to $29. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — HIMS or NVO?
In this comparison, NVO (4.
0% yield) pays a dividend. HIMS does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is HIMS or NVO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Novo Nordisk A/S (NVO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (4.
0% yield, +105. 1% 10Y return). Hims & Hers Health, Inc. (HIMS) carries a higher beta of 2. 40 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NVO: +105. 1%, HIMS: +174. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HIMS and NVO?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: HIMS is a small-cap high-growth stock; NVO is a large-cap deep-value stock. NVO pays a dividend while HIMS does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.