REIT - Office
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
HIW vs DEA vs PDM vs VNO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Office
REIT - Office
REIT - Office
HIW vs DEA vs PDM vs VNO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Office | REIT - Office | REIT - Office | REIT - Office |
| Market Cap | $2.82B | $1.08B | $1.06B | $6.03B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $820M | $344M | $422M | $1.81B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $93M | $15M | $-86M | $795M |
| Gross Margin | 67.4% | 49.7% | 19.1% | 73.2% |
| Operating Margin | 25.6% | 24.9% | 13.9% | 13.3% |
| Forward P/E | 39.6x | 69.5x | — | 376.9x |
| Total Debt | $3.64B | $1.68B | $2.27B | $7.89B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $27M | $23M | $731K | $841M |
HIW vs DEA vs PDM vs VNO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Highwoods Propertie… (HIW) | 100 | 66.8 | -33.2% |
| Easterly Government… (DEA) | 100 | 37.2 | -62.8% |
| Piedmont Office Rea… (PDM) | 100 | 50.9 | -49.1% |
| Vornado Realty Trust (VNO) | 100 | 88.5 | -11.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HIW vs DEA vs PDM vs VNO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HIW is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- -6.8% 10Y total return vs DEA's -8.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.76, current ratio 42.45x
- Beta 0.76, yield 7.7%, current ratio 42.45x
- Lower P/E (39.6x vs 376.9x)
DEA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.51, yield 9.0%
- 11.3% FFO/revenue growth vs HIW's -2.4%
- Beta 0.51 vs VNO's 1.19
- 9.0% yield, vs VNO's 2.3%
PDM is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +26.5% vs VNO's -15.7%
VNO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 1.3%, EPS growth 104.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 0.2%
- 44.0% margin vs PDM's -20.5%
- 6.4% ROA vs PDM's -2.2%, ROIC 1.4% vs 1.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 11.3% FFO/revenue growth vs HIW's -2.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (39.6x vs 376.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 44.0% margin vs PDM's -20.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.51 vs VNO's 1.19 | |
| Dividends | 9.0% yield, vs VNO's 2.3% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +26.5% vs VNO's -15.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.4% ROA vs PDM's -2.2%, ROIC 1.4% vs 1.5% |
HIW vs DEA vs PDM vs VNO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
HIW vs DEA vs PDM vs VNO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
VNO leads in 2 of 6 categories
PDM leads 1 • DEA leads 1 • HIW leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — DEA and VNO each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VNO is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.8B annually — 5.2x DEA's $344M. VNO is the more profitable business, keeping 44.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PDM's -20.5%. On growth, DEA holds the edge at +10.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $820M | $344M | $422M | $1.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $511M | $203M | $229M | $719M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $93M | $15M | -$86M | $795M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $318M | $262M | $47M | $1.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +67.4% | +49.7% | +19.1% | +73.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +25.6% | +24.9% | +13.9% | +13.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.4% | +4.3% | -20.5% | +44.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +38.7% | +76.2% | +11.2% | +69.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.8% | +10.6% | -100.0% | -0.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -67.8% | -55.4% | -23.0% | -127.9% |
Valuation Metrics
PDM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.6x trailing earnings, VNO trades at a 91% valuation discount to DEA's 80.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PDM's 10.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than VNO's 17.3x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.8B | $1.1B | $1.1B | $6.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.4B | $2.7B | $3.3B | $13.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 17.63x | 80.31x | -12.67x | 7.63x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 39.58x | 69.52x | — | 376.94x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.75x | 13.85x | 10.88x | 17.34x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.50x | 3.21x | 1.88x | 3.33x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.16x | 0.77x | 0.71x | 0.90x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 16.93x | 4.16x | — | 4.79x |
Profitability & Efficiency
VNO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
VNO delivers a 11.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-6 for PDM. VNO carries lower financial leverage with a 1.16x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PDM's 1.52x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), VNO scores 7/9 vs DEA's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.8% | +1.1% | -5.7% | +11.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.5% | +0.4% | -2.2% | +6.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.7% | +2.1% | +1.5% | +1.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.5% | +3.6% | +2.0% | +1.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.49x | 1.23x | 1.52x | 1.16x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.6B | $1.7B | $2.3B | $7.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $27M | $23M | $731,000 | $841M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.6B | $1.7B | $2.3B | $7.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.07x | 1.18x | 0.35x | 3.63x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
VNO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in VNO five years ago would be worth $8,238 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,084 for PDM. Over the past 12 months, PDM leads with a +26.5% total return vs VNO's -15.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors VNO at 34.9% vs DEA's -5.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +0.7% | +13.5% | +2.4% | -4.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -5.2% | +25.0% | +26.5% | -15.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +44.3% | -16.2% | +47.5% | +145.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -20.1% | -37.0% | -39.2% | -17.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -6.8% | -8.7% | -23.4% | -34.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +13.0% | -5.7% | +13.8% | +34.9% |
Risk & Volatility
DEA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DEA is the less volatile stock with a 0.51 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VNO's 1.19 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DEA currently trades 93.4% from its 52-week high vs VNO's 73.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.76x | 0.51x | 1.08x | 1.19x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $32.76 | $24.94 | $9.19 | $43.37 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $20.45 | $19.82 | $6.32 | $24.57 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +78.0% | +93.4% | +92.4% | +73.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 69.6 | 54.0 | 67.0 | 68.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.3M | 381K | 1.1M | 2.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — DEA and VNO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HIW as "Hold", DEA as "Hold", PDM as "Hold", VNO as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 17.8% upside for PDM (target: $10) vs -29.5% for DEA (target: $16). For income investors, DEA offers the higher dividend yield at 9.01% vs VNO's 2.30%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $27.00 | $16.41 | $10.00 | $37.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 22 | 8 | 11 | 28 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +7.7% | +9.0% | +2.9% | +2.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.96 | $2.10 | $0.25 | $0.74 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.8% |
VNO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). PDM leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
HIW vs DEA vs PDM vs VNO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HIW or DEA or PDM or VNO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Easterly Government Properties, Inc.
(DEA) is the stronger pick with 11. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 4% for Highwoods Properties, Inc. (HIW). Vornado Realty Trust (VNO) offers the better valuation at 7. 6x trailing P/E (376. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Highwoods Properties, Inc. (HIW) a "Hold" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HIW or DEA or PDM or VNO?
On trailing P/E, Vornado Realty Trust (VNO) is the cheapest at 7.
6x versus Easterly Government Properties, Inc. at 80. 3x. On forward P/E, Highwoods Properties, Inc. is actually cheaper at 39. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HIW or DEA or PDM or VNO?
Over the past 5 years, Vornado Realty Trust (VNO) delivered a total return of -17.
6%, compared to -39. 2% for Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc. (PDM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HIW returned -6. 8% versus VNO's -34. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HIW or DEA or PDM or VNO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Easterly Government Properties, Inc.
(DEA) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 51β versus Vornado Realty Trust's 1. 19β — meaning VNO is approximately 132% more volatile than DEA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Vornado Realty Trust (VNO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 116% versus 152% for Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HIW or DEA or PDM or VNO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Easterly Government Properties, Inc.
(DEA) is pulling ahead at 11. 3% versus -2. 4% for Highwoods Properties, Inc. (HIW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Vornado Realty Trust grew EPS 104. 0% year-over-year, compared to -37. 0% for Easterly Government Properties, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, DEA leads at 4. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HIW or DEA or PDM or VNO?
Vornado Realty Trust (VNO) is the more profitable company, earning 50.
0% net margin versus -14. 8% for Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc. — meaning it keeps 50. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HIW leads at 26. 0% versus 14. 1% for PDM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — VNO leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HIW or DEA or PDM or VNO more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Highwoods Properties, Inc.
(HIW) trades at 39. 6x forward P/E versus 376. 9x for Vornado Realty Trust — 337. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PDM: 17. 8% to $10. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — HIW or DEA or PDM or VNO?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Easterly Government Properties, Inc. (DEA) offers the highest yield at 9. 0%, versus 2. 3% for Vornado Realty Trust (VNO).
09Is HIW or DEA or PDM or VNO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Easterly Government Properties, Inc.
(DEA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 51), 9. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (DEA: -8. 7%, VNO: -34. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HIW and DEA and PDM and VNO?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: HIW is a small-cap deep-value stock; DEA is a small-cap income-oriented stock; PDM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; VNO is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.