Integrated Freight & Logistics
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
HKPD vs NUVB vs KYMR vs ATXG vs ARVN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Integrated Freight & Logistics
Biotechnology
HKPD vs NUVB vs KYMR vs ATXG vs ARVN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Integrated Freight & Logistics | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Integrated Freight & Logistics | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $7M | $1.67B | $6.91B | $3M | $652M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $20M | $143M | $51M | $4M | $263M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-27K | $-146M | $-315M | $-7M | $-81M |
| Gross Margin | 11.9% | 91.6% | 33.2% | 14.7% | 99.5% |
| Operating Margin | 0.7% | -105.0% | -7.0% | -49.4% | -44.0% |
| Total Debt | $2M | $10M | $82M | $22M | $9M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $749K | $164M | $357M | $325K | $143M |
HKPD vs NUVB vs KYMR vs ATXG vs ARVN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hong Kong Pharma Di… (HKPD) | 100 | 32.0 | -68.0% |
| Nuvation Bio Inc. (NUVB) | 100 | 208.7 | +108.7% |
| Kymera Therapeutics… (KYMR) | 100 | 213.8 | +113.8% |
| Addentax Group Corp. (ATXG) | 100 | 49.4 | -50.6% |
| Arvinas, Inc. (ARVN) | 100 | 57.9 | -42.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HKPD vs NUVB vs KYMR vs ATXG vs ARVN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HKPD has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in quality and efficiency.
- -0.1% margin vs KYMR's -6.1%
- -0.3% ROA vs NUVB's -23.8%, ROIC 1.6% vs -54.3%
NUVB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 7.0%, EPS growth 71.6%
- 7.0% revenue growth vs ATXG's -18.9%
KYMR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and defensive.
- 154.4% 10Y total return vs NUVB's -51.8%
- Beta 1.15, current ratio 10.47x
- +190.7% vs ATXG's -53.4%
ATXG is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Better valuation composite
ARVN is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 1.15
- Lower volatility, beta 1.15, Low D/E 2.0%, current ratio 4.92x
- Beta 1.15 vs NUVB's 2.04, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.0% revenue growth vs ATXG's -18.9% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | -0.1% margin vs KYMR's -6.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.15 vs NUVB's 2.04, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +190.7% vs ATXG's -53.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -0.3% ROA vs NUVB's -23.8%, ROIC 1.6% vs -54.3% |
HKPD vs NUVB vs KYMR vs ATXG vs ARVN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
HKPD vs NUVB vs KYMR vs ATXG vs ARVN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HKPD leads in 2 of 6 categories
KYMR leads 1 • NUVB leads 0 • ATXG leads 0 • ARVN leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HKPD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ARVN is the larger business by revenue, generating $263M annually — 70.8x ATXG's $4M. HKPD is the more profitable business, keeping -0.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KYMR's -6.1%. On growth, NUVB holds the edge at +26.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $20M | $143M | $51M | $4M | $263M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | -$145M | -$352M | -$947,630 | -$111M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | -$146M | -$315M | -$7M | -$81M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | -$126M | -$244M | -$1M | -$276M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +11.9% | +91.6% | +33.2% | +14.7% | +99.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +0.7% | -105.0% | -7.0% | -49.4% | -44.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -0.1% | -102.1% | -6.1% | -2.0% | -30.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.0% | -88.1% | -4.7% | -34.3% | -105.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.7% | +26.0% | +55.5% | -7.9% | -84.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -176.5% | +106.3% | +13.4% | -136.8% | -65.1% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — HKPD and ATXG each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7M | $1.7B | $6.9B | $3M | $652M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $9M | $1.5B | $6.6B | $25M | $517M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -213.33x | -8.03x | -22.93x | -0.38x | -7.96x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.19x | — | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.35x | 26.61x | 176.26x | 0.67x | 2.48x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.31x | 5.38x | 4.52x | 0.09x | 1.52x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 17.00x | — | — | 4.56x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
HKPD leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HKPD delivers a -0.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-1 in annual profit, vs $-44 for NUVB. ARVN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ATXG's 1.03x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -0.6% | -44.1% | -25.0% | -31.7% | -14.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.3% | -23.8% | -22.3% | -19.4% | -9.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.6% | -54.3% | -24.9% | -2.9% | -22.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.2% | -42.8% | -27.2% | -3.9% | -16.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.48x | 0.03x | 0.05x | 1.03x | 0.02x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2M | -$154M | -$275M | $22M | -$134M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $748,721 | $164M | $357M | $324,953 | $143M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $10M | $82M | $22M | $9M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.35x | -162.11x | -2119.53x | -3.67x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KYMR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KYMR five years ago would be worth $19,212 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $43 for ATXG. Over the past 12 months, KYMR leads with a +190.7% total return vs ATXG's -53.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KYMR at 45.0% vs ATXG's -65.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -20.7% | -43.8% | +16.3% | -13.9% | -11.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -27.3% | +136.3% | +190.7% | -53.4% | +52.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -77.3% | +197.5% | +205.1% | -95.9% | -58.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -77.3% | -58.3% | +92.1% | -99.6% | -84.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -77.3% | -51.8% | +154.4% | -99.9% | -36.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -39.0% | +43.8% | +45.0% | -65.4% | -25.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — KYMR and ARVN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ARVN is the less volatile stock with a 1.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NUVB's 2.04 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KYMR currently trades 82.2% from its 52-week high vs ATXG's 17.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.66x | 2.04x | 1.15x | 1.44x | 1.15x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.76 | $9.75 | $103.00 | $27.90 | $14.51 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.37 | $1.57 | $28.06 | $0.37 | $5.90 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +23.2% | +49.4% | +82.2% | +17.5% | +70.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.6 | 59.1 | 54.1 | 44.6 | 42.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 24K | 4.3M | 602K | 157K | 808K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NUVB as "Buy", KYMR as "Buy", ARVN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 157.3% upside for NUVB (target: $12) vs 27.6% for ARVN (target: $13).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $12.40 | $117.06 | — | $13.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 9 | 26 | — | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +14.1% |
HKPD leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). KYMR leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
HKPD vs NUVB vs KYMR vs ATXG vs ARVN: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HKPD or NUVB or KYMR or ATXG or ARVN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Nuvation Bio Inc.
(NUVB) is the stronger pick with 699. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -18. 9% for Addentax Group Corp. (ATXG). Analysts rate Nuvation Bio Inc. (NUVB) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — HKPD or NUVB or KYMR or ATXG or ARVN?
Over the past 5 years, Kymera Therapeutics, Inc.
(KYMR) delivered a total return of +92. 1%, compared to -99. 6% for Addentax Group Corp. (ATXG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KYMR returned +154. 4% versus ATXG's -99. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — HKPD or NUVB or KYMR or ATXG or ARVN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Arvinas, Inc.
(ARVN) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 15β versus Nuvation Bio Inc. 's 2. 04β — meaning NUVB is approximately 78% more volatile than ARVN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Arvinas, Inc. (ARVN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 103% for Addentax Group Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — HKPD or NUVB or KYMR or ATXG or ARVN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Nuvation Bio Inc.
(NUVB) is pulling ahead at 699. 0% versus -18. 9% for Addentax Group Corp. (ATXG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Nuvation Bio Inc. grew EPS 71. 6% year-over-year, compared to -101. 7% for Hong Kong Pharma Digital Technology Holdings Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, ARVN leads at 26. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — HKPD or NUVB or KYMR or ATXG or ARVN?
Hong Kong Pharma Digital Technology Holdings Limited (HKPD) is the more profitable company, earning -0.
1% net margin versus -794. 4% for Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps -0. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HKPD leads at 0. 7% versus -891. 3% for KYMR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KYMR leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — HKPD or NUVB or KYMR or ATXG or ARVN?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is HKPD or NUVB or KYMR or ATXG or ARVN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Kymera Therapeutics, Inc.
(KYMR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 15), +154. 4% 10Y return). Nuvation Bio Inc. (NUVB) carries a higher beta of 2. 04 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KYMR: +154. 4%, NUVB: -51. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between HKPD and NUVB and KYMR and ATXG and ARVN?
These companies operate in different sectors (HKPD (Industrials) and NUVB (Healthcare) and KYMR (Healthcare) and ATXG (Industrials) and ARVN (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: HKPD is a small-cap high-growth stock; NUVB is a small-cap high-growth stock; KYMR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ATXG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ARVN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.