Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

HL vs SCCO vs FCX vs NEM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
HL
Hecla Mining Company

Gold

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$12.13B
5Y Perf.+444.8%
SCCO
Southern Copper Corporation

Copper

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$148.31B
5Y Perf.+419.7%
FCX
Freeport-McMoRan Inc.

Copper

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$87.11B
5Y Perf.+568.2%
NEM
Newmont Corporation

Gold

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$125.72B
5Y Perf.+94.1%

HL vs SCCO vs FCX vs NEM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
HL logoHL
SCCO logoSCCO
FCX logoFCX
NEM logoNEM
IndustryGoldCopperCopperGold
Market Cap$12.13B$148.31B$87.11B$125.72B
Revenue (TTM)$1.57B$13.42B$26.42B$17.23B
Net Income (TTM)$559M$4.33B$2.73B$5.26B
Gross Margin50.9%56.7%27.8%52.1%
Operating Margin44.1%52.2%27.8%49.3%
Forward P/E19.1x25.4x22.4x10.9x
Total Debt$299M$7.41B$11.50B$474M
Cash & Equiv.$242M$4.30B$3.35B$7.65B

HL vs SCCO vs FCX vs NEMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

HL
SCCO
FCX
NEM
StockMay 20May 26Return
Hecla Mining Company (HL)100544.8+444.8%
Southern Copper Cor… (SCCO)100519.7+419.7%
Freeport-McMoRan In… (FCX)100668.2+568.2%
Newmont Corporation (NEM)100194.1+94.1%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: HL vs SCCO vs FCX vs NEM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: HL leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Southern Copper Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for dividend income and shareholder returns and operational efficiency and capital deployment. NEM also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
HL
Hecla Mining Company
The Growth Play

HL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 53.0%, EPS growth 7.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 25.6%
  • 53.0% revenue growth vs FCX's 1.1%
  • 35.6% margin vs FCX's 10.3%
  • +271.0% vs FCX's +65.3%
Best for: growth exposure
SCCO
Southern Copper Corporation
The Income Pick

SCCO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.78, yield 1.7%
  • 6.7% 10Y total return vs HL's 360.6%
  • Beta 1.78, yield 1.7%, current ratio 3.89x
  • 1.7% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs FCX's 1.0%
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
FCX
Freeport-McMoRan Inc.
The Value Pick

FCX is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.

  • PEG 0.75 vs SCCO's 1.22
Best for: valuation efficiency
NEM
Newmont Corporation
The Defensive Pick

NEM is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.75, Low D/E 1.4%, current ratio 1.72x
  • Lower P/E (10.9x vs 25.4x), PEG 0.85 vs 1.22
  • Beta 0.75 vs FCX's 1.79, lower leverage
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthHL logoHL53.0% revenue growth vs FCX's 1.1%
ValueNEM logoNEMLower P/E (10.9x vs 25.4x), PEG 0.85 vs 1.22
Quality / MarginsHL logoHL35.6% margin vs FCX's 10.3%
Stability / SafetyNEM logoNEMBeta 0.75 vs FCX's 1.79, lower leverage
DividendsSCCO logoSCCO1.7% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs FCX's 1.0%
Momentum (1Y)HL logoHL+271.0% vs FCX's +65.3%
Efficiency (ROA)SCCO logoSCCO21.4% ROA vs FCX's 4.7%, ROIC 38.6% vs 12.8%

HL vs SCCO vs FCX vs NEM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

HLHecla Mining Company
FY 2024
Silver Contracts
43.5%$414M
Gold
33.5%$318M
Zinc
13.8%$131M
Lead
9.2%$87M
Copper
0.0%$416,000
SCCOSouthern Copper Corporation
FY 2025
Copper
74.8%$10.0B
Molybdenum
10.5%$1.4B
Silver
7.3%$974M
Zinc
3.9%$530M
Other
3.6%$477M
FCXFreeport-McMoRan Inc.
FY 2025
Copper Cathode
31.4%$8.1B
Copper In Concentrates
24.3%$6.3B
Refined Copper Products
17.0%$4.4B
Gold
15.0%$3.9B
Molybdenum
7.6%$2.0B
Other Products Or Services
2.9%$749M
Purchased Copper
1.7%$449M
NEMNewmont Corporation
FY 2025
Gold Dore
63.2%$14.3B
Sales From Concentrate And Other Production
36.8%$8.3B

HL vs SCCO vs FCX vs NEM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLNEMLAGGINGFCX

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — HL and SCCO each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

FCX is the larger business by revenue, generating $26.4B annually — 16.8x HL's $1.6B. HL is the more profitable business, keeping 35.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FCX's 10.3%. On growth, HL holds the edge at +57.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricHL logoHLHecla Mining Comp…SCCO logoSCCOSouthern Copper C…FCX logoFCXFreeport-McMoRan …NEM logoNEMNewmont Corporati…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$1.6B$13.4B$26.4B$17.2B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$853M$7.9B$9.6B$12.7B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$559M$4.3B$2.7B$5.3B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$472M$3.4B$6.2B$12.9B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+50.9%+56.7%+27.8%+52.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+44.1%+52.2%+27.8%+49.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+35.6%+32.3%+10.3%+30.5%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+30.0%+25.5%+23.6%+75.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+57.4%+39.0%+12.2%-100.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-160.0%+54.5%+154.2%-100.0%
Evenly matched — HL and SCCO each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

NEM leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 17.7x trailing earnings, NEM trades at a 56% valuation discount to FCX's 39.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FCX offers better value at 1.33x vs SCCO's 1.64x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricHL logoHLHecla Mining Comp…SCCO logoSCCOSouthern Copper C…FCX logoFCXFreeport-McMoRan …NEM logoNEMNewmont Corporati…
Market CapShares × price$12.1B$148.3B$87.1B$125.7B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$12.2B$151.4B$95.3B$118.6B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS36.92x34.26x39.88x17.70x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.19.07x25.40x22.41x10.89x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.64x1.33x1.38x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple17.25x19.24x11.16x9.03x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue8.53x11.05x3.38x5.69x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share4.58x13.55x2.84x3.69x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF39.11x43.28x78.05x17.22x
NEM leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — SCCO and NEM each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

SCCO delivers a 42.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $42 in annual profit, vs $9 for FCX. NEM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SCCO's 0.67x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NEM scores 9/9 vs FCX's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricHL logoHLHecla Mining Comp…SCCO logoSCCOSouthern Copper C…FCX logoFCXFreeport-McMoRan …NEM logoNEMNewmont Corporati…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+22.5%+42.0%+8.9%+15.6%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+16.3%+21.4%+4.7%+9.4%
ROICReturn on invested capital+15.3%+38.6%+12.8%+24.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+16.8%+39.2%+12.4%+20.7%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–98859
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.12x0.67x0.37x0.01x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$57M$3.1B$8.1B-$7.2B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$242M$4.3B$3.4B$7.6B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$299M$7.4B$11.5B$474M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense19.04x19.33x17.68x50.54x
Evenly matched — SCCO and NEM each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — HL and SCCO each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in SCCO five years ago would be worth $26,737 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,433 for FCX. Over the past 12 months, HL leads with a +271.0% total return vs FCX's +65.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HL at 43.4% vs FCX's 19.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricHL logoHLHecla Mining Comp…SCCO logoSCCOSouthern Copper C…FCX logoFCXFreeport-McMoRan …NEM logoNEMNewmont Corporati…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-4.1%+21.4%+17.3%+12.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+271.0%+110.5%+65.3%+112.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+194.9%+151.0%+70.7%+142.1%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+150.3%+167.4%+44.3%+80.0%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+360.6%+668.4%+507.7%+293.1%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+43.4%+35.9%+19.5%+34.3%
Evenly matched — HL and SCCO each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — FCX and NEM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

NEM is the less volatile stock with a 0.75 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FCX's 1.79 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FCX currently trades 85.4% from its 52-week high vs HL's 52.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricHL logoHLHecla Mining Comp…SCCO logoSCCOSouthern Copper C…FCX logoFCXFreeport-McMoRan …NEM logoNEMNewmont Corporati…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.26x1.78x1.79x0.75x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$34.17$223.89$70.97$134.88
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$4.68$85.72$35.15$48.27
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+52.9%+80.2%+85.4%+84.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10046.654.149.153.5
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded15.4M1.6M15.4M9.2M
Evenly matched — FCX and NEM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — SCCO and FCX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: HL as "Hold", SCCO as "Hold", FCX as "Buy", NEM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 31.7% upside for HL (target: $24) vs -12.9% for SCCO (target: $156). For income investors, SCCO offers the higher dividend yield at 1.65% vs NEM's 0.88%.

MetricHL logoHLHecla Mining Comp…SCCO logoSCCOSouthern Copper C…FCX logoFCXFreeport-McMoRan …NEM logoNEMNewmont Corporati…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldHoldBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$23.83$156.40$67.00$137.50
# AnalystsCovering analysts26304136
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.1%+1.7%+1.0%+0.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0151
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.01$2.96$0.60$1.00
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.0%0.0%+0.1%+1.8%
Evenly matched — SCCO and FCX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

NEM leads in 1 of 6 categories — strongest in Valuation Metrics. 5 categories are tied.

Best OverallNewmont Corporation (NEM)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

HL vs SCCO vs FCX vs NEM: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is HL or SCCO or FCX or NEM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Hecla Mining Company (HL) is the stronger pick with 53.

0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 1% for Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX). Newmont Corporation (NEM) offers the better valuation at 17. 7x trailing P/E (10. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX) a "Buy" — based on 41 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — HL or SCCO or FCX or NEM?

On trailing P/E, Newmont Corporation (NEM) is the cheapest at 17.

7x versus Freeport-McMoRan Inc. at 39. 9x. On forward P/E, Newmont Corporation is actually cheaper at 10. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Freeport-McMoRan Inc. wins at 0. 75x versus Southern Copper Corporation's 1. 22x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — HL or SCCO or FCX or NEM?

Over the past 5 years, Southern Copper Corporation (SCCO) delivered a total return of +167.

4%, compared to +44. 3% for Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SCCO returned +668. 4% versus NEM's +293. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — HL or SCCO or FCX or NEM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Newmont Corporation (NEM) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

75β versus Freeport-McMoRan Inc. 's 1. 79β — meaning FCX is approximately 137% more volatile than NEM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Newmont Corporation (NEM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 67% for Southern Copper Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — HL or SCCO or FCX or NEM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hecla Mining Company (HL) is pulling ahead at 53.

0% versus 1. 1% for Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hecla Mining Company grew EPS 765. 7% year-over-year, compared to 16. 9% for Freeport-McMoRan Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HL leads at 25. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — HL or SCCO or FCX or NEM?

Southern Copper Corporation (SCCO) is the more profitable company, earning 32.

3% net margin versus 8. 6% for Freeport-McMoRan Inc. — meaning it keeps 32. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SCCO leads at 52. 2% versus 24. 4% for FCX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SCCO leads at 56. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is HL or SCCO or FCX or NEM more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 75x versus Southern Copper Corporation's 1. 22x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Newmont Corporation (NEM) trades at 10. 9x forward P/E versus 25. 4x for Southern Copper Corporation — 14. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HL: 31. 7% to $23. 83.

08

Which pays a better dividend — HL or SCCO or FCX or NEM?

In this comparison, SCCO (1.

7% yield), FCX (1. 0% yield), NEM (0. 9% yield) pay a dividend. HL does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is HL or SCCO or FCX or NEM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Newmont Corporation (NEM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

75), 0. 9% yield, +293. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NEM: +293. 1%, HL: +360. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between HL and SCCO and FCX and NEM?

Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: HL is a mid-cap high-growth stock; SCCO is a mid-cap high-growth stock; FCX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; NEM is a mid-cap high-growth stock. SCCO, FCX, NEM pay a dividend while HL does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

HL

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 28%
  • Net Margin > 21%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SCCO

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 19%
  • Net Margin > 19%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FCX

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
  • Net Margin > 6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NEM

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 18%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform HL and SCCO and FCX and NEM on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(HL: 57.4% · SCCO: 39.0%)
Net Margin>
%
(HL: 35.6% · SCCO: 32.3%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(HL: 36.9x · SCCO: 34.3x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.