Gold
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
HL vs SCCO vs FCX vs NEM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Copper
Copper
Gold
HL vs SCCO vs FCX vs NEM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Gold | Copper | Copper | Gold |
| Market Cap | $12.13B | $148.31B | $87.11B | $125.72B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.57B | $13.42B | $26.42B | $17.23B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $559M | $4.33B | $2.73B | $5.26B |
| Gross Margin | 50.9% | 56.7% | 27.8% | 52.1% |
| Operating Margin | 44.1% | 52.2% | 27.8% | 49.3% |
| Forward P/E | 19.1x | 25.4x | 22.4x | 10.9x |
| Total Debt | $299M | $7.41B | $11.50B | $474M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $242M | $4.30B | $3.35B | $7.65B |
HL vs SCCO vs FCX vs NEM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hecla Mining Company (HL) | 100 | 544.8 | +444.8% |
| Southern Copper Cor… (SCCO) | 100 | 519.7 | +419.7% |
| Freeport-McMoRan In… (FCX) | 100 | 668.2 | +568.2% |
| Newmont Corporation (NEM) | 100 | 194.1 | +94.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HL vs SCCO vs FCX vs NEM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 53.0%, EPS growth 7.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 25.6%
- 53.0% revenue growth vs FCX's 1.1%
- 35.6% margin vs FCX's 10.3%
- +271.0% vs FCX's +65.3%
SCCO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.78, yield 1.7%
- 6.7% 10Y total return vs HL's 360.6%
- Beta 1.78, yield 1.7%, current ratio 3.89x
- 1.7% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs FCX's 1.0%
FCX is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.75 vs SCCO's 1.22
NEM is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.75, Low D/E 1.4%, current ratio 1.72x
- Lower P/E (10.9x vs 25.4x), PEG 0.85 vs 1.22
- Beta 0.75 vs FCX's 1.79, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 53.0% revenue growth vs FCX's 1.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.9x vs 25.4x), PEG 0.85 vs 1.22 | |
| Quality / Margins | 35.6% margin vs FCX's 10.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.75 vs FCX's 1.79, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.7% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs FCX's 1.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +271.0% vs FCX's +65.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 21.4% ROA vs FCX's 4.7%, ROIC 38.6% vs 12.8% |
HL vs SCCO vs FCX vs NEM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
HL vs SCCO vs FCX vs NEM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NEM leads in 1 of 6 categories
HL leads 0 • SCCO leads 0 • FCX leads 0 • 5 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — HL and SCCO each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FCX is the larger business by revenue, generating $26.4B annually — 16.8x HL's $1.6B. HL is the more profitable business, keeping 35.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FCX's 10.3%. On growth, HL holds the edge at +57.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.6B | $13.4B | $26.4B | $17.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $853M | $7.9B | $9.6B | $12.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $559M | $4.3B | $2.7B | $5.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $472M | $3.4B | $6.2B | $12.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +50.9% | +56.7% | +27.8% | +52.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +44.1% | +52.2% | +27.8% | +49.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +35.6% | +32.3% | +10.3% | +30.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +30.0% | +25.5% | +23.6% | +75.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +57.4% | +39.0% | +12.2% | -100.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -160.0% | +54.5% | +154.2% | -100.0% |
Valuation Metrics
NEM leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 17.7x trailing earnings, NEM trades at a 56% valuation discount to FCX's 39.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FCX offers better value at 1.33x vs SCCO's 1.64x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $12.1B | $148.3B | $87.1B | $125.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $12.2B | $151.4B | $95.3B | $118.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 36.92x | 34.26x | 39.88x | 17.70x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 19.07x | 25.40x | 22.41x | 10.89x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.64x | 1.33x | 1.38x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 17.25x | 19.24x | 11.16x | 9.03x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 8.53x | 11.05x | 3.38x | 5.69x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.58x | 13.55x | 2.84x | 3.69x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 39.11x | 43.28x | 78.05x | 17.22x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — SCCO and NEM each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SCCO delivers a 42.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $42 in annual profit, vs $9 for FCX. NEM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SCCO's 0.67x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NEM scores 9/9 vs FCX's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +22.5% | +42.0% | +8.9% | +15.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +16.3% | +21.4% | +4.7% | +9.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +15.3% | +38.6% | +12.8% | +24.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +16.8% | +39.2% | +12.4% | +20.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 9 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.12x | 0.67x | 0.37x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $57M | $3.1B | $8.1B | -$7.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $242M | $4.3B | $3.4B | $7.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $299M | $7.4B | $11.5B | $474M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 19.04x | 19.33x | 17.68x | 50.54x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — HL and SCCO each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SCCO five years ago would be worth $26,737 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,433 for FCX. Over the past 12 months, HL leads with a +271.0% total return vs FCX's +65.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HL at 43.4% vs FCX's 19.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -4.1% | +21.4% | +17.3% | +12.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +271.0% | +110.5% | +65.3% | +112.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +194.9% | +151.0% | +70.7% | +142.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +150.3% | +167.4% | +44.3% | +80.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +360.6% | +668.4% | +507.7% | +293.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +43.4% | +35.9% | +19.5% | +34.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FCX and NEM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NEM is the less volatile stock with a 0.75 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FCX's 1.79 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FCX currently trades 85.4% from its 52-week high vs HL's 52.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.26x | 1.78x | 1.79x | 0.75x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $34.17 | $223.89 | $70.97 | $134.88 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.68 | $85.72 | $35.15 | $48.27 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +52.9% | +80.2% | +85.4% | +84.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.6 | 54.1 | 49.1 | 53.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 15.4M | 1.6M | 15.4M | 9.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SCCO and FCX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HL as "Hold", SCCO as "Hold", FCX as "Buy", NEM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 31.7% upside for HL (target: $24) vs -12.9% for SCCO (target: $156). For income investors, SCCO offers the higher dividend yield at 1.65% vs NEM's 0.88%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $23.83 | $156.40 | $67.00 | $137.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 26 | 30 | 41 | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.1% | +1.7% | +1.0% | +0.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 | 5 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.01 | $2.96 | $0.60 | $1.00 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | 0.0% | +0.1% | +1.8% |
NEM leads in 1 of 6 categories — strongest in Valuation Metrics. 5 categories are tied.
HL vs SCCO vs FCX vs NEM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HL or SCCO or FCX or NEM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Hecla Mining Company (HL) is the stronger pick with 53.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 1% for Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX). Newmont Corporation (NEM) offers the better valuation at 17. 7x trailing P/E (10. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX) a "Buy" — based on 41 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HL or SCCO or FCX or NEM?
On trailing P/E, Newmont Corporation (NEM) is the cheapest at 17.
7x versus Freeport-McMoRan Inc. at 39. 9x. On forward P/E, Newmont Corporation is actually cheaper at 10. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Freeport-McMoRan Inc. wins at 0. 75x versus Southern Copper Corporation's 1. 22x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HL or SCCO or FCX or NEM?
Over the past 5 years, Southern Copper Corporation (SCCO) delivered a total return of +167.
4%, compared to +44. 3% for Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SCCO returned +668. 4% versus NEM's +293. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HL or SCCO or FCX or NEM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Newmont Corporation (NEM) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
75β versus Freeport-McMoRan Inc. 's 1. 79β — meaning FCX is approximately 137% more volatile than NEM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Newmont Corporation (NEM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 67% for Southern Copper Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HL or SCCO or FCX or NEM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hecla Mining Company (HL) is pulling ahead at 53.
0% versus 1. 1% for Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hecla Mining Company grew EPS 765. 7% year-over-year, compared to 16. 9% for Freeport-McMoRan Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HL leads at 25. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HL or SCCO or FCX or NEM?
Southern Copper Corporation (SCCO) is the more profitable company, earning 32.
3% net margin versus 8. 6% for Freeport-McMoRan Inc. — meaning it keeps 32. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SCCO leads at 52. 2% versus 24. 4% for FCX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SCCO leads at 56. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HL or SCCO or FCX or NEM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 75x versus Southern Copper Corporation's 1. 22x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Newmont Corporation (NEM) trades at 10. 9x forward P/E versus 25. 4x for Southern Copper Corporation — 14. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HL: 31. 7% to $23. 83.
08Which pays a better dividend — HL or SCCO or FCX or NEM?
In this comparison, SCCO (1.
7% yield), FCX (1. 0% yield), NEM (0. 9% yield) pay a dividend. HL does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is HL or SCCO or FCX or NEM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Newmont Corporation (NEM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
75), 0. 9% yield, +293. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NEM: +293. 1%, HL: +360. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HL and SCCO and FCX and NEM?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: HL is a mid-cap high-growth stock; SCCO is a mid-cap high-growth stock; FCX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; NEM is a mid-cap high-growth stock. SCCO, FCX, NEM pay a dividend while HL does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.