Communication Equipment
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
HLIT vs VIAV vs LITE vs ADTN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Communication Equipment
Communication Equipment
Communication Equipment
HLIT vs VIAV vs LITE vs ADTN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Communication Equipment | Communication Equipment | Communication Equipment | Communication Equipment |
| Market Cap | $1.38B | $11.81B | $63.74B | $1.17B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $636M | $1.37B | $2.49B | $1.12B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $50M | $-55M | $440M | $-30M |
| Gross Margin | 55.7% | 55.7% | 37.7% | 38.6% |
| Operating Margin | 12.1% | 8.2% | 9.5% | -0.5% |
| Forward P/E | 21.8x | 55.2x | 114.4x | 29.7x |
| Total Debt | $148M | $692M | $2.61B | $245M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $101M | $424M | $521M | $96M |
HLIT vs VIAV vs LITE vs ADTN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Harmonic Inc. (HLIT) | 100 | 227.8 | +127.8% |
| Viavi Solutions Inc. (VIAV) | 100 | 440.5 | +340.5% |
| Lumentum Holdings I… (LITE) | 100 | 1217.7 | +1117.7% |
| ADTRAN Holdings, In… (ADTN) | 100 | 127.6 | +27.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HLIT vs VIAV vs LITE vs ADTN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HLIT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.51, Low D/E 31.9%, current ratio 2.18x
- Beta 1.51, current ratio 2.18x
- Lower P/E (21.8x vs 114.4x)
- Beta 1.51 vs LITE's 2.69, lower leverage
VIAV is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.54
LITE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 21.0%, EPS growth 104.6%, 3Y rev CAGR -1.3%
- 36.4% 10Y total return vs VIAV's 7.2%
- 21.0% revenue growth vs VIAV's 8.4%
- 17.7% margin vs VIAV's -4.0%
ADTN lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 21.0% revenue growth vs VIAV's 8.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (21.8x vs 114.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.7% margin vs VIAV's -4.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.51 vs LITE's 2.69, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +12.5% vs HLIT's +38.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.5% ROA vs ADTN's -2.5%, ROIC -4.3% vs -1.7% |
HLIT vs VIAV vs LITE vs ADTN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
HLIT vs VIAV vs LITE vs ADTN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HLIT leads in 2 of 6 categories
ADTN leads 1 • LITE leads 1 • VIAV leads 1 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — HLIT and LITE each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LITE is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.5B annually — 3.9x HLIT's $636M. LITE is the more profitable business, keeping 17.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to VIAV's -4.0%. On growth, LITE holds the edge at +90.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $636M | $1.4B | $2.5B | $1.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $88M | $207M | $425M | $43M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $50M | -$55M | $440M | -$30M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $133M | $46M | $399M | $58M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +55.7% | +55.7% | +37.7% | +38.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +12.1% | +8.2% | +9.5% | -0.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.8% | -4.0% | +17.7% | -2.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +21.0% | +3.3% | +16.0% | +5.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -27.3% | +42.8% | +90.1% | +15.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -87.5% | -70.2% | +3.3% | +92.9% |
Valuation Metrics
ADTN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 37.2x trailing earnings, HLIT trades at a 98% valuation discount to LITE's 2412.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ADTN's 17.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LITE's 859.4x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.4B | $11.8B | $63.7B | $1.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.4B | $12.1B | $65.8B | $1.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 37.21x | 340.33x | 2412.94x | -25.53x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 21.80x | 55.18x | 114.43x | 29.69x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 74.57x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 18.93x | 90.43x | 859.43x | 17.20x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.03x | 10.89x | 38.75x | 1.08x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.10x | 14.77x | 54.76x | 2.23x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 26.13x | 190.52x | — | 11.98x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HLIT leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LITE delivers a 30.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $31 in annual profit, vs $-7 for VIAV. HLIT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.32x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LITE's 2.30x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HLIT scores 7/9 vs ADTN's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.2% | -6.9% | +30.7% | -5.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.5% | -2.3% | +8.5% | -2.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.3% | +5.5% | -4.3% | -1.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.2% | +4.9% | -4.8% | -1.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.32x | 0.89x | 2.30x | 0.47x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $47M | $269M | $2.1B | $149M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $101M | $424M | $521M | $96M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $148M | $692M | $2.6B | $245M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 12.92x | 2.70x | 9.62x | 0.14x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LITE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LITE five years ago would be worth $107,656 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,752 for ADTN. Over the past 12 months, LITE leads with a +1247.8% total return vs HLIT's +38.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LITE at 165.2% vs HLIT's -3.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +22.6% | +181.3% | +131.2% | +67.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +38.1% | +466.6% | +1247.8% | +83.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -8.9% | +461.0% | +1764.2% | +70.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +69.4% | +212.0% | +976.6% | -22.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +269.9% | +715.5% | +3635.5% | -8.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -3.1% | +77.7% | +165.2% | +19.6% |
Risk & Volatility
HLIT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HLIT is the less volatile stock with a 1.51 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LITE's 2.69 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HLIT currently trades 99.2% from its 52-week high vs ADTN's 77.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.51x | 1.54x | 2.69x | 1.91x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $12.38 | $60.43 | $1021.00 | $18.69 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.80 | $8.87 | $60.38 | $7.11 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.2% | +84.5% | +87.4% | +77.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 76.9 | 66.7 | 58.8 | 50.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 6.3M | 6.4M | 2.2M |
Analyst Outlook
VIAV leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HLIT as "Hold", VIAV as "Buy", LITE as "Buy", ADTN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 23.7% upside for ADTN (target: $18) vs -36.8% for VIAV (target: $32).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $12.50 | $32.25 | $643.18 | $18.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 19 | 19 | 24 | 25 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.2% | +0.1% | +0.1% | 0.0% |
HLIT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Risk & Volatility). ADTN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
HLIT vs VIAV vs LITE vs ADTN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HLIT or VIAV or LITE or ADTN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Lumentum Holdings Inc.
(LITE) is the stronger pick with 21. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 8. 4% for Viavi Solutions Inc. (VIAV). Harmonic Inc. (HLIT) offers the better valuation at 37. 2x trailing P/E (21. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Viavi Solutions Inc. (VIAV) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HLIT or VIAV or LITE or ADTN?
On trailing P/E, Harmonic Inc.
(HLIT) is the cheapest at 37. 2x versus Lumentum Holdings Inc. at 2412. 9x. On forward P/E, Harmonic Inc. is actually cheaper at 21. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HLIT or VIAV or LITE or ADTN?
Over the past 5 years, Lumentum Holdings Inc.
(LITE) delivered a total return of +976. 6%, compared to -22. 5% for ADTRAN Holdings, Inc. (ADTN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LITE returned +36. 4% versus ADTN's -8. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HLIT or VIAV or LITE or ADTN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Harmonic Inc.
(HLIT) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 51β versus Lumentum Holdings Inc. 's 2. 69β — meaning LITE is approximately 79% more volatile than HLIT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Harmonic Inc. (HLIT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 32% versus 2% for Lumentum Holdings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HLIT or VIAV or LITE or ADTN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Lumentum Holdings Inc.
(LITE) is pulling ahead at 21. 0% versus 8. 4% for Viavi Solutions Inc. (VIAV). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Viavi Solutions Inc. grew EPS 225. 0% year-over-year, compared to -54. 2% for Harmonic Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HLIT leads at 10. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HLIT or VIAV or LITE or ADTN?
Harmonic Inc.
(HLIT) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 8% net margin versus -4. 2% for ADTRAN Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 5. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HLIT leads at 9. 3% versus -10. 9% for LITE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — VIAV leads at 56. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HLIT or VIAV or LITE or ADTN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Harmonic Inc.
(HLIT) trades at 21. 8x forward P/E versus 114. 4x for Lumentum Holdings Inc. — 92. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ADTN: 23. 7% to $18. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — HLIT or VIAV or LITE or ADTN?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is HLIT or VIAV or LITE or ADTN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Viavi Solutions Inc.
(VIAV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+715. 5% 10Y return). Lumentum Holdings Inc. (LITE) carries a higher beta of 2. 69 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (VIAV: +715. 5%, LITE: +36. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HLIT and VIAV and LITE and ADTN?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: HLIT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; VIAV is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; LITE is a mid-cap high-growth stock; ADTN is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.