Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
HLMN vs ACCO vs WMT vs SITE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Business Equipment & Supplies
Specialty Retail
Industrial - Distribution
HLMN vs ACCO vs WMT vs SITE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories | Business Equipment & Supplies | Specialty Retail | Industrial - Distribution |
| Market Cap | $1.55B | $375M | $1.04T | $5.54B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.56B | $1.55B | $703.06B | $4.71B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $36M | $74M | $22.91B | $153M |
| Gross Margin | 46.1% | 30.7% | 24.9% | 34.9% |
| Operating Margin | 6.9% | 7.9% | 4.1% | 5.1% |
| Forward P/E | 13.5x | 4.8x | 44.7x | 28.7x |
| Total Debt | $828M | $921M | $67.09B | $980M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $27M | $64M | $10.73B | $191M |
HLMN vs ACCO vs WMT vs SITE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hillman Solutions C… (HLMN) | 100 | 75.2 | -24.8% |
| ACCO Brands Corpora… (ACCO) | 100 | 48.0 | -52.0% |
| Walmart Inc. (WMT) | 100 | 271.0 | +171.0% |
| SiteOne Landscape S… (SITE) | 100 | 78.8 | -21.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HLMN vs ACCO vs WMT vs SITE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HLMN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 5.4%, EPS growth 122.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 1.5%
- 5.4% revenue growth vs ACCO's -8.5%
ACCO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for defensive.
- Beta 1.33, yield 7.1%, current ratio 1.61x
- Lower P/E (4.8x vs 28.7x)
- 4.8% margin vs HLMN's 2.3%
- 7.1% yield, vs WMT's 0.7%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
WMT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 37 yrs, beta 0.12, yield 0.7%
- 499.5% 10Y total return vs SITE's 368.6%
- PEG 4.06 vs SITE's 6.91
- Beta 0.12 vs HLMN's 1.37, lower leverage
SITE is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.24, Low D/E 58.2%, current ratio 2.47x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.4% revenue growth vs ACCO's -8.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (4.8x vs 28.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 4.8% margin vs HLMN's 2.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.12 vs HLMN's 1.37, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 7.1% yield, vs WMT's 0.7%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +32.7% vs SITE's +5.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.9% ROA vs HLMN's 1.5%, ROIC 14.7% vs 4.5% |
HLMN vs ACCO vs WMT vs SITE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
HLMN vs ACCO vs WMT vs SITE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
WMT leads in 3 of 6 categories
ACCO leads 2 • HLMN leads 0 • SITE leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ACCO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WMT is the larger business by revenue, generating $703.1B annually — 453.3x ACCO's $1.6B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 4.8% (ACCO) to 2.3% (HLMN). On growth, ACCO holds the edge at +8.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.6B | $1.6B | $703.1B | $4.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $251M | $177M | $42.8B | $382M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $36M | $74M | $22.9B | $153M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $91M | $49M | $15.3B | $246M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +46.1% | +30.7% | +24.9% | +34.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.9% | +7.9% | +4.1% | +5.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.3% | +4.8% | +3.3% | +3.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.9% | +3.2% | +2.2% | +5.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.0% | +8.3% | +5.8% | +0.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +2.4% | +35.1% | +1.6% |
Valuation Metrics
ACCO leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.2x trailing earnings, ACCO trades at a 81% valuation discount to WMT's 47.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), WMT offers better value at 4.33x vs SITE's 8.94x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.5B | $375M | $1.04T | $5.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.3B | $1.2B | $1.09T | $6.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 39.40x | 9.23x | 47.69x | 37.08x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.52x | 4.83x | 44.71x | 28.67x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 4.33x | 8.94x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.07x | 6.80x | 24.85x | 16.70x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.00x | 0.25x | 1.46x | 1.18x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.28x | 0.57x | 10.45x | 3.35x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 44.07x | 7.37x | 24.97x | 22.44x |
Profitability & Efficiency
WMT leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WMT delivers a 22.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $3 for HLMN. SITE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.58x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ACCO's 1.39x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SITE scores 8/9 vs WMT's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.9% | +11.3% | +22.3% | +9.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.5% | +3.2% | +7.9% | +4.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.5% | +5.5% | +14.7% | +7.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.6% | +6.1% | +17.5% | +9.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.67x | 1.39x | 0.67x | 0.58x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $801M | $856M | $56.4B | $789M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $27M | $64M | $10.7B | $191M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $828M | $921M | $67.1B | $980M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.96x | 2.50x | 11.85x | 6.79x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WMT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WMT five years ago would be worth $28,695 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,075 for ACCO. Over the past 12 months, WMT leads with a +32.7% total return vs SITE's +5.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WMT at 37.6% vs SITE's -6.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -9.5% | +12.1% | +15.7% | -0.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +7.8% | +22.8% | +32.7% | +5.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -3.1% | -4.4% | +160.5% | -18.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -30.4% | -39.3% | +186.9% | -38.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -19.7% | -35.1% | +499.5% | +368.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -1.0% | -1.5% | +37.6% | -6.7% |
Risk & Volatility
WMT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WMT is the less volatile stock with a 0.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HLMN's 1.37 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WMT currently trades 96.7% from its 52-week high vs HLMN's 72.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.37x | 1.33x | 0.12x | 1.24x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $10.85 | $4.29 | $134.69 | $168.56 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.55 | $2.81 | $91.89 | $112.23 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +72.6% | +94.6% | +96.7% | +74.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.8 | 74.3 | 55.9 | 36.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.5M | 1.2M | 17.2M | 689K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — ACCO and WMT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HLMN as "Buy", ACCO as "Hold", WMT as "Buy", SITE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 97.0% upside for ACCO (target: $8) vs 5.3% for WMT (target: $137). For income investors, ACCO offers the higher dividend yield at 7.07% vs WMT's 0.72%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $14.00 | $8.00 | $137.04 | $162.29 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 7 | 64 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +7.1% | +0.7% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 37 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.29 | $0.94 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.8% | +4.0% | +0.8% | +1.8% |
WMT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). ACCO leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
HLMN vs ACCO vs WMT vs SITE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HLMN or ACCO or WMT or SITE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Hillman Solutions Corp.
(HLMN) is the stronger pick with 5. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 5% for ACCO Brands Corporation (ACCO). ACCO Brands Corporation (ACCO) offers the better valuation at 9. 2x trailing P/E (4. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Hillman Solutions Corp. (HLMN) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HLMN or ACCO or WMT or SITE?
On trailing P/E, ACCO Brands Corporation (ACCO) is the cheapest at 9.
2x versus Walmart Inc. at 47. 7x. On forward P/E, ACCO Brands Corporation is actually cheaper at 4. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Walmart Inc. wins at 4. 06x versus SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. 's 6. 91x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HLMN or ACCO or WMT or SITE?
Over the past 5 years, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) delivered a total return of +186. 9%, compared to -39. 3% for ACCO Brands Corporation (ACCO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WMT returned +499. 5% versus ACCO's -35. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HLMN or ACCO or WMT or SITE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 12β versus Hillman Solutions Corp. 's 1. 37β — meaning HLMN is approximately 1075% more volatile than WMT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. (SITE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 58% versus 139% for ACCO Brands Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HLMN or ACCO or WMT or SITE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hillman Solutions Corp.
(HLMN) is pulling ahead at 5. 4% versus -8. 5% for ACCO Brands Corporation (ACCO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ACCO Brands Corporation grew EPS 141. 5% year-over-year, compared to 13. 3% for Walmart Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SITE leads at 5. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HLMN or ACCO or WMT or SITE?
SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc.
(SITE) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 2% net margin versus 2. 6% for Hillman Solutions Corp. — meaning it keeps 3. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HLMN leads at 7. 6% versus 4. 2% for WMT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HLMN leads at 39. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HLMN or ACCO or WMT or SITE more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Walmart Inc. (WMT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 4. 06x versus SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. 's 6. 91x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, ACCO Brands Corporation (ACCO) trades at 4. 8x forward P/E versus 44. 7x for Walmart Inc. — 39. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ACCO: 97. 0% to $8. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — HLMN or ACCO or WMT or SITE?
In this comparison, ACCO (7.
1% yield), WMT (0. 7% yield) pay a dividend. HLMN, SITE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is HLMN or ACCO or WMT or SITE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 12), 0. 7% yield, +499. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WMT: +499. 5%, HLMN: -19. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HLMN and ACCO and WMT and SITE?
These companies operate in different sectors (HLMN (Industrials) and ACCO (Industrials) and WMT (Consumer Defensive) and SITE (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: HLMN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ACCO is a small-cap deep-value stock; WMT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; SITE is a small-cap quality compounder stock. ACCO, WMT pay a dividend while HLMN, SITE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.