Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
HLN vs DBVT vs KVUE vs ALKS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Household & Personal Products
Biotechnology
HLN vs DBVT vs KVUE vs ALKS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Biotechnology | Household & Personal Products | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $41.45B | $1712.35T | $34.06B | $5.90B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $22.01B | $0.00 | $15.29B | $1.56B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $3.18B | $-168M | $1.62B | $153M |
| Gross Margin | 63.9% | — | 58.4% | 65.4% |
| Operating Margin | 21.4% | — | 19.0% | 12.3% |
| Forward P/E | 22.2x | — | 15.6x | 24.8x |
| Total Debt | $8.59B | $22M | $8.52B | $70M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.32B | $194M | $1.06B | $1.12B |
HLN vs DBVT vs KVUE vs ALKS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Haleon plc (HLN) | 100 | 115.8 | +15.8% |
| DBV Technologies S.… (DBVT) | 100 | 102.5 | +2.5% |
| Kenvue Inc. (KVUE) | 100 | 69.9 | -30.1% |
| Alkermes plc (ALKS) | 100 | 122.4 | +22.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HLN vs DBVT vs KVUE vs ALKS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HLN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 31.7% 10Y total return vs ALKS's -11.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.06, Low D/E 52.2%, current ratio 0.92x
- 14.5% margin vs DBVT's 0.3%
- Beta 0.06 vs DBVT's 1.26
DBVT is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +110.4% vs KVUE's -19.7%
KVUE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.24, yield 4.6%
- Rev growth -2.1%, EPS growth 40.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 0.4%
- Beta 0.24, yield 4.6%, current ratio 0.96x
- -2.1% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0%
ALKS lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -2.1% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 14.5% margin vs DBVT's 0.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.06 vs DBVT's 1.26 | |
| Dividends | 4.6% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs HLN's 1.9%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +110.4% vs KVUE's -19.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 10.0% ROA vs DBVT's -89.0% |
HLN vs DBVT vs KVUE vs ALKS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
HLN vs DBVT vs KVUE vs ALKS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ALKS leads in 2 of 6 categories
KVUE leads 1 • DBVT leads 1 • HLN leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ALKS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HLN and DBVT operate at a comparable scale, with $22.0B and $0 in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 14.5% (HLN) to 9.8% (ALKS). On growth, ALKS holds the edge at +28.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $22.0B | $0 | $15.3B | $1.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $5.3B | -$112M | $3.3B | $212M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $3.2B | -$168M | $1.6B | $153M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $3.1B | -$151M | $1.5B | $392M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +63.9% | — | +58.4% | +65.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +21.4% | — | +19.0% | +12.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +14.5% | — | +10.6% | +9.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +14.2% | — | +9.6% | +25.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -0.4% | — | +4.5% | +28.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +18.8% | +91.5% | +47.1% | -4.1% |
Valuation Metrics
KVUE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 19.0x trailing earnings, HLN trades at a 23% valuation discount to ALKS's 24.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, KVUE's 12.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ALKS's 17.3x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $41.4B | $1712.35T | $34.1B | $5.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $51.3B | $1712.35T | $41.5B | $4.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 19.01x | -0.76x | 23.34x | 24.76x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 22.22x | — | 15.59x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.25x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.62x | — | 12.73x | 17.25x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.83x | — | 2.25x | 4.00x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.87x | 0.66x | 3.17x | 3.28x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 15.47x | — | 19.78x | 12.28x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ALKS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HLN delivers a 19.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $20 in annual profit, vs $-130 for DBVT. ALKS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KVUE's 0.79x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HLN scores 8/9 vs DBVT's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +19.9% | -130.2% | +15.2% | +8.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +10.0% | -89.0% | +6.0% | +5.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.6% | — | +11.4% | +18.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.6% | -145.7% | +13.2% | +14.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 4 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.52x | 0.13x | 0.79x | 0.04x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $7.3B | -$172M | $7.5B | -$1.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.3B | $194M | $1.1B | $1.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $8.6B | $22M | $8.5B | $70M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 7.80x | -189.82x | 4.68x | 32.30x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
DBVT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ALKS five years ago would be worth $16,091 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,090 for DBVT. Over the past 12 months, DBVT leads with a +110.4% total return vs KVUE's -19.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DBVT at 6.2% vs KVUE's -9.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -5.6% | +4.9% | +3.6% | +25.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -11.7% | +110.4% | -19.7% | +16.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +10.4% | +19.7% | -24.6% | +14.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +31.7% | -69.1% | -25.7% | +60.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +31.7% | -87.0% | -25.7% | -11.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +3.4% | +6.2% | -9.0% | +4.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HLN and ALKS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HLN is the less volatile stock with a 0.06 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DBVT's 1.26 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ALKS currently trades 96.7% from its 52-week high vs KVUE's 70.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.06x | 1.26x | 0.24x | 1.06x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.42 | $26.18 | $25.17 | $36.60 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.71 | $7.53 | $14.02 | $25.17 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +81.5% | +76.3% | +70.5% | +96.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 36.0 | 48.1 | 54.8 | 60.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 8.0M | 252K | 19.5M | 2.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — HLN and KVUE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HLN as "Buy", DBVT as "Buy", KVUE as "Hold", ALKS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 131.8% upside for DBVT (target: $46) vs 2.9% for KVUE (target: $18). For income investors, KVUE offers the higher dividend yield at 4.63% vs HLN's 1.94%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $10.20 | $46.33 | $18.25 | $44.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 15 | 14 | 28 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.9% | — | +4.6% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.13 | — | $0.82 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.1% | 0.0% | +0.6% | +0.5% |
ALKS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). KVUE leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
HLN vs DBVT vs KVUE vs ALKS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HLN or DBVT or KVUE or ALKS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Kenvue Inc.
(KVUE) is the stronger pick with -2. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 2% for Alkermes plc (ALKS). Haleon plc (HLN) offers the better valuation at 19. 0x trailing P/E (22. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Haleon plc (HLN) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HLN or DBVT or KVUE or ALKS?
On trailing P/E, Haleon plc (HLN) is the cheapest at 19.
0x versus Alkermes plc at 24. 8x. On forward P/E, Kenvue Inc. is actually cheaper at 15. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HLN or DBVT or KVUE or ALKS?
Over the past 5 years, Alkermes plc (ALKS) delivered a total return of +60.
9%, compared to -69. 1% for DBV Technologies S. A. (DBVT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HLN returned +31. 7% versus DBVT's -87. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HLN or DBVT or KVUE or ALKS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Haleon plc (HLN) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
06β versus DBV Technologies S. A. 's 1. 26β — meaning DBVT is approximately 1958% more volatile than HLN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Alkermes plc (ALKS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 79% for Kenvue Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HLN or DBVT or KVUE or ALKS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Kenvue Inc.
(KVUE) is pulling ahead at -2. 1% versus -5. 2% for Alkermes plc (ALKS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Kenvue Inc. grew EPS 40. 7% year-over-year, compared to -347. 5% for DBV Technologies S. A.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ALKS leads at 9. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HLN or DBVT or KVUE or ALKS?
Alkermes plc (ALKS) is the more profitable company, earning 16.
4% net margin versus 0. 0% for DBV Technologies S. A. — meaning it keeps 16. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HLN leads at 22. 4% versus 0. 0% for DBVT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ALKS leads at 86. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HLN or DBVT or KVUE or ALKS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Kenvue Inc.
(KVUE) trades at 15. 6x forward P/E versus 22. 2x for Haleon plc — 6. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DBVT: 131. 8% to $46. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — HLN or DBVT or KVUE or ALKS?
In this comparison, KVUE (4.
6% yield), HLN (1. 9% yield) pay a dividend. DBVT, ALKS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is HLN or DBVT or KVUE or ALKS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Haleon plc (HLN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
06), 1. 9% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HLN: +31. 7%, DBVT: -87. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HLN and DBVT and KVUE and ALKS?
These companies operate in different sectors (HLN (Healthcare) and DBVT (Healthcare) and KVUE (Consumer Defensive) and ALKS (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: HLN is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; DBVT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; KVUE is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; ALKS is a small-cap quality compounder stock. HLN, KVUE pay a dividend while DBVT, ALKS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.