Business Equipment & Supplies
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
HNI vs MLKN vs SCS vs UFI vs HOFT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Business Equipment & Supplies
Apparel - Manufacturers
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
HNI vs MLKN vs SCS vs UFI vs HOFT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Business Equipment & Supplies | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | Business Equipment & Supplies | Apparel - Manufacturers | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances |
| Market Cap | $1.70B | $1.11B | $1.85B | $75M | $138M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.59B | $3.75B | $3.26B | $555M | $376M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-15M | $-25M | $95M | $-40M | $-13M |
| Gross Margin | 39.9% | 38.7% | 33.5% | 3.5% | 22.4% |
| Operating Margin | 4.6% | 2.0% | 4.0% | -6.2% | -4.8% |
| Forward P/E | 8.6x | 9.0x | 14.1x | — | — |
| Total Debt | $1.63B | $1.81B | $601M | $116M | $70M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $209M | $194M | $346M | $23M | $6M |
HNI vs MLKN vs SCS vs UFI vs HOFT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| HNI Corporation (HNI) | 100 | 136.2 | +36.2% |
| MillerKnoll, Inc. (MLKN) | 100 | 71.2 | -28.8% |
| Steelcase Inc. (SCS) | 100 | 140.7 | +40.7% |
| Unifi, Inc. (UFI) | 100 | 29.4 | -70.6% |
| Hooker Furnishings … (HOFT) | 100 | 78.9 | -21.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HNI vs MLKN vs SCS vs UFI vs HOFT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HNI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 12.4%, EPS growth -61.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.3%
- 12.4% revenue growth vs HOFT's -8.3%
- Better valuation composite
Among these 5 stocks, MLKN doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
SCS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 38.1% 10Y total return vs HNI's 9.3%
- 2.9% margin vs UFI's -7.2%
- +64.9% vs HNI's -17.7%
- 4.1% ROA vs UFI's -9.8%, ROIC 9.9% vs -2.1%
UFI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.31, Low D/E 46.4%, current ratio 3.32x
- Beta 0.31 vs SCS's 2.04, lower leverage
HOFT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 10 yrs, beta 0.73, yield 7.3%
- Beta 0.73, yield 7.3%, current ratio 3.53x
- 7.3% yield, 10-year raise streak, vs HNI's 3.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.4% revenue growth vs HOFT's -8.3% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 2.9% margin vs UFI's -7.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.31 vs SCS's 2.04, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 7.3% yield, 10-year raise streak, vs HNI's 3.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +64.9% vs HNI's -17.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.1% ROA vs UFI's -9.8%, ROIC 9.9% vs -2.1% |
HNI vs MLKN vs SCS vs UFI vs HOFT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
HNI vs MLKN vs SCS vs UFI vs HOFT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SCS leads in 2 of 6 categories
HNI leads 1 • HOFT leads 1 • MLKN leads 0 • UFI leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HNI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MLKN is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.7B annually — 10.0x HOFT's $376M. SCS is the more profitable business, keeping 2.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to UFI's -7.2%. On growth, HNI holds the edge at +124.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.6B | $3.7B | $3.3B | $555M | $376M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $323M | $145M | $207M | -$16M | -$9M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$15M | -$25M | $95M | -$40M | -$13M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $8M | $70M | -$37M | $15M | -$14M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +39.9% | +38.7% | +33.5% | +3.5% | +22.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.6% | +2.0% | +4.0% | -6.2% | -4.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -0.4% | -0.7% | +2.9% | -7.2% | -3.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.2% | +1.9% | -1.1% | +2.8% | -3.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +124.7% | -1.6% | +4.8% | -11.3% | -13.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | -75.5% | -43.1% | +87.0% | -63.2% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — HNI and UFI each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.8x trailing earnings, SCS trades at a 49% valuation discount to HNI's 31.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SCS's 8.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MLKN's 14.3x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.7B | $1.1B | $1.9B | $75M | $138M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.1B | $2.7B | $2.1B | $168M | $202M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 31.26x | -30.91x | 15.82x | -3.64x | -10.72x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.57x | 9.00x | 14.12x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 12.39x | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.01x | 14.29x | 8.82x | 10.67x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.60x | 0.30x | 0.59x | 0.13x | 0.35x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.92x | 0.85x | 1.95x | 0.30x | 0.66x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.06x | 10.92x | 18.28x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
SCS leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SCS delivers a 9.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-17 for UFI. HOFT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.34x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MLKN's 1.36x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SCS scores 6/9 vs UFI's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -1.2% | -1.8% | +9.4% | -16.7% | -6.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.5% | -0.6% | +4.1% | -9.8% | -4.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.8% | +1.3% | +9.9% | -2.1% | -5.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.3% | +1.5% | +9.6% | -2.7% | -6.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 1 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.89x | 1.36x | 0.63x | 0.46x | 0.34x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.4B | $1.6B | $254M | $93M | $64M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $209M | $194M | $346M | $23M | $6M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.6B | $1.8B | $601M | $116M | $70M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.01x | 0.66x | 5.09x | -4.43x | -13.29x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SCS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SCS five years ago would be worth $12,641 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,465 for UFI. Over the past 12 months, SCS leads with a +64.9% total return vs HNI's -17.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SCS at 30.0% vs UFI's -21.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -17.7% | -9.3% | — | +15.4% | +16.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -17.7% | +6.9% | +64.9% | -12.6% | +57.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +42.6% | +11.1% | +119.7% | -52.4% | +1.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -7.3% | -53.9% | +26.4% | -85.3% | -56.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +9.3% | -23.2% | +38.1% | -84.1% | -20.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +12.5% | +3.6% | +30.0% | -21.9% | +0.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SCS and UFI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
UFI is the less volatile stock with a 0.31 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SCS's 2.04 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SCS currently trades 92.8% from its 52-week high vs HNI's 65.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.07x | 1.69x | 2.04x | 0.31x | 0.73x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $53.29 | $23.18 | $17.40 | $5.42 | $15.99 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $31.41 | $13.77 | $9.70 | $2.96 | $8.46 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +65.1% | +70.7% | +92.8% | +74.5% | +80.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 34.4 | 44.2 | 50.2 | 61.9 | 46.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 743K | 845K | 1.8M | 28K | 43K |
Analyst Outlook
HOFT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HNI as "Buy", MLKN as "Hold", SCS as "Hold", HOFT as "Buy". For income investors, HOFT offers the higher dividend yield at 7.28% vs SCS's 2.56%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $95.00 | — | — | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 6 | 4 | — | 2 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.7% | +4.6% | +2.6% | — | +7.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 10 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.29 | $0.75 | $0.41 | — | $0.94 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.9% | +7.6% | +2.0% | +0.2% | 0.0% |
SCS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). HNI leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
HNI vs MLKN vs SCS vs UFI vs HOFT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HNI or MLKN or SCS or UFI or HOFT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, HNI Corporation (HNI) is the stronger pick with 12.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 3% for Hooker Furnishings Corporation (HOFT). Steelcase Inc. (SCS) offers the better valuation at 15. 8x trailing P/E (14. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate HNI Corporation (HNI) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HNI or MLKN or SCS or UFI or HOFT?
On trailing P/E, Steelcase Inc.
(SCS) is the cheapest at 15. 8x versus HNI Corporation at 31. 3x. On forward P/E, HNI Corporation is actually cheaper at 8. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HNI or MLKN or SCS or UFI or HOFT?
Over the past 5 years, Steelcase Inc.
(SCS) delivered a total return of +26. 4%, compared to -85. 3% for Unifi, Inc. (UFI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SCS returned +38. 1% versus UFI's -84. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HNI or MLKN or SCS or UFI or HOFT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Unifi, Inc.
(UFI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 31β versus Steelcase Inc. 's 2. 04β — meaning SCS is approximately 556% more volatile than UFI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Hooker Furnishings Corporation (HOFT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 34% versus 136% for MillerKnoll, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HNI or MLKN or SCS or UFI or HOFT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), HNI Corporation (HNI) is pulling ahead at 12.
4% versus -8. 3% for Hooker Furnishings Corporation (HOFT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Unifi, Inc. grew EPS 57. 5% year-over-year, compared to -236. 4% for Hooker Furnishings Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, HNI leads at 6. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HNI or MLKN or SCS or UFI or HOFT?
Steelcase Inc.
(SCS) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 8% net margin versus -3. 6% for Unifi, Inc. — meaning it keeps 3. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HNI leads at 8. 4% versus -4. 6% for HOFT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HNI leads at 41. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HNI or MLKN or SCS or UFI or HOFT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, HNI Corporation (HNI) trades at 8.
6x forward P/E versus 14. 1x for Steelcase Inc. — 5. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — HNI or MLKN or SCS or UFI or HOFT?
In this comparison, HOFT (7.
3% yield), MLKN (4. 6% yield), HNI (3. 7% yield), SCS (2. 6% yield) pay a dividend. UFI does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is HNI or MLKN or SCS or UFI or HOFT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Hooker Furnishings Corporation (HOFT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
73), 7. 3% yield). Steelcase Inc. (SCS) carries a higher beta of 2. 04 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HOFT: -20. 5%, SCS: +38. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HNI and MLKN and SCS and UFI and HOFT?
These companies operate in different sectors (HNI (Industrials) and MLKN (Consumer Cyclical) and SCS (Industrials) and UFI (Consumer Cyclical) and HOFT (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: HNI is a small-cap income-oriented stock; MLKN is a small-cap income-oriented stock; SCS is a small-cap deep-value stock; UFI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HOFT is a small-cap income-oriented stock. HNI, MLKN, SCS, HOFT pay a dividend while UFI does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.