Asset Management
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
HNNA vs SAMG vs GROW vs DHIL vs CSWC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
Asset Management - Global
Asset Management
Asset Management
HNNA vs SAMG vs GROW vs DHIL vs CSWC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Asset Management | Asset Management | Asset Management - Global | Asset Management | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $81M | $56M | $35M | $473M | $1.43B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $36M | $125M | $8M | $158M | $164M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $8M | $14M | $98K | $49M | $103M |
| Gross Margin | 70.1% | 33.0% | 41.7% | 96.0% | 66.5% |
| Operating Margin | 37.0% | 7.4% | -35.3% | 38.4% | 48.5% |
| Forward P/E | 8.0x | 11.9x | — | 9.5x | 10.1x |
| Total Debt | $41M | $24M | $83K | $6.40B | $956M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $72M | $44M | $25M | $42M | $43M |
HNNA vs SAMG vs GROW vs DHIL vs CSWC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hennessy Advisors, … (HNNA) | 100 | 127.5 | +27.5% |
| Silvercrest Asset M… (SAMG) | 100 | 121.6 | +21.6% |
| U.S. Global Investo… (GROW) | 100 | 125.4 | +25.4% |
| Diamond Hill Invest… (DHIL) | 100 | 164.0 | +64.0% |
| Capital Southwest C… (CSWC) | 100 | 171.6 | +71.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HNNA vs SAMG vs GROW vs DHIL vs CSWC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HNNA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 19.9%, EPS growth 38.0%
- 19.9% NII/revenue growth vs GROW's -23.1%
- Lower P/E (8.0x vs 10.1x)
- Beta 0.30 vs CSWC's 0.84, lower leverage
SAMG ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 0.83, yield 5.9%
GROW is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.71, Low D/E 0.2%, current ratio 20.87x
DHIL is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency and defensive.
- PEG 1.14 vs HNNA's 2.18
- Beta 0.57, yield 5.7%, current ratio 75115.85x
CSWC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and bank quality.
- 234.2% 10Y total return vs GROW's 67.4%
- NIM 7.0% vs SAMG's 0.4%
- Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs GROW's 0.8% (lower = leaner)
- 10.2% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs SAMG's 5.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.9% NII/revenue growth vs GROW's -23.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.0x vs 10.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs GROW's 0.8% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.30 vs CSWC's 0.84, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 10.2% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs SAMG's 5.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +34.0% vs SAMG's -8.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs GROW's 0.8% |
HNNA vs SAMG vs GROW vs DHIL vs CSWC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
HNNA vs SAMG vs GROW vs DHIL vs CSWC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CSWC leads in 2 of 6 categories
SAMG leads 1 • HNNA leads 0 • GROW leads 0 • DHIL leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CSWC leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CSWC is the larger business by revenue, generating $164M annually — 19.4x GROW's $8M. CSWC is the more profitable business, keeping 43.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GROW's -4.0%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $36M | $125M | $8M | $158M | $164M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $11M | $12M | -$2M | $62M | $142M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $8M | $14M | $98,000 | $49M | $103M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $10M | $17M | -$235,000 | $44.5B | -$69M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +70.1% | +33.0% | +41.7% | +96.0% | +66.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +37.0% | +7.4% | -35.3% | +38.4% | +48.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +28.0% | +11.2% | -4.0% | +30.9% | +43.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +37.6% | +14.8% | -9.8% | -57.4% | -132.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -27.3% | -108.8% | — | +25.3% | +113.3% |
Valuation Metrics
SAMG leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.0x trailing earnings, HNNA trades at a 67% valuation discount to SAMG's 24.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), DHIL offers better value at 1.18x vs HNNA's 2.18x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $81M | $56M | $35M | $473M | $1.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $49M | $36M | $10M | $6.8B | $2.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 8.03x | 24.46x | -104.80x | 9.77x | 16.32x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 11.88x | — | 9.48x | 10.06x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.18x | — | — | 1.18x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.62x | 3.09x | — | 110.39x | 27.43x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.27x | 0.45x | 4.14x | 3.00x | 8.71x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.82x | 1.42x | 0.77x | 2.70x | 1.39x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 6.03x | 3.03x | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — HNNA and GROW and DHIL each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DHIL delivers a 27.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $0 for GROW. GROW carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DHIL's 36.26x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HNNA scores 7/9 vs CSWC's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.5% | +14.2% | +0.2% | +27.0% | +10.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.3% | +8.8% | +0.2% | +19.5% | +4.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.3% | +5.6% | -4.7% | +1.3% | +3.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.7% | +5.3% | -6.2% | +26.0% | +4.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 2 | 6 | 1 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.41x | 0.28x | 0.00x | 36.26x | 1.08x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$32M | -$20M | -$24M | $6.4B | $913M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $72M | $44M | $25M | $42M | $43M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $41M | $24M | $83,000 | $6.4B | $956M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 9.62x | 83.82x | 600.00x | — | 2.91x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CSWC leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CSWC five years ago would be worth $15,138 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,143 for GROW. Over the past 12 months, CSWC leads with a +34.0% total return vs SAMG's -8.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CSWC at 20.7% vs SAMG's -2.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +7.4% | -9.7% | +7.7% | +2.8% | +11.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +1.2% | -8.2% | +27.8% | +33.8% | +34.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +66.8% | -8.4% | +3.3% | +22.4% | +75.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +37.6% | +20.6% | -58.6% | +28.3% | +51.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -35.0% | +61.1% | +67.4% | +55.4% | +234.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +18.6% | -2.9% | +1.1% | +7.0% | +20.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HNNA and DHIL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HNNA is the less volatile stock with a 0.30 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CSWC's 0.84 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DHIL currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs GROW's 71.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.30x | 0.83x | 0.71x | 0.57x | 0.84x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $13.19 | $16.99 | $3.65 | $175.03 | $24.43 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.90 | $12.79 | $2.10 | $114.11 | $19.37 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +77.3% | +80.6% | +71.8% | +100.0% | +98.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.6 | 43.7 | 46.5 | 70.5 | 63.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 9K | 31K | 25K | 23K | 664K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SAMG and CSWC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SAMG as "Buy", CSWC as "Buy". For income investors, CSWC offers the higher dividend yield at 10.20% vs GROW's 3.46%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | — | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | — | — | $22.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 3 | — | — | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +5.3% | +5.9% | +3.5% | +5.7% | +10.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.54 | $0.80 | $0.09 | $9.98 | $2.45 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.6% | +54.0% | +5.6% | +3.6% | 0.0% |
CSWC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). SAMG leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
HNNA vs SAMG vs GROW vs DHIL vs CSWC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HNNA or SAMG or GROW or DHIL or CSWC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Hennessy Advisors, Inc.
(HNNA) is the stronger pick with 19. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -23. 1% for U. S. Global Investors, Inc. (GROW). Hennessy Advisors, Inc. (HNNA) offers the better valuation at 8. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc. (SAMG) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HNNA or SAMG or GROW or DHIL or CSWC?
On trailing P/E, Hennessy Advisors, Inc.
(HNNA) is the cheapest at 8. 0x versus Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc. at 24. 5x. On forward P/E, Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HNNA or SAMG or GROW or DHIL or CSWC?
Over the past 5 years, Capital Southwest Corporation (CSWC) delivered a total return of +51.
4%, compared to -58. 6% for U. S. Global Investors, Inc. (GROW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CSWC returned +234. 2% versus HNNA's -35. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HNNA or SAMG or GROW or DHIL or CSWC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hennessy Advisors, Inc.
(HNNA) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 30β versus Capital Southwest Corporation's 0. 84β — meaning CSWC is approximately 176% more volatile than HNNA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, U. S. Global Investors, Inc. (GROW) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 36% for Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HNNA or SAMG or GROW or DHIL or CSWC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hennessy Advisors, Inc.
(HNNA) is pulling ahead at 19. 9% versus -23. 1% for U. S. Global Investors, Inc. (GROW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hennessy Advisors, Inc. grew EPS 38. 0% year-over-year, compared to -126. 6% for U. S. Global Investors, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HNNA or SAMG or GROW or DHIL or CSWC?
Capital Southwest Corporation (CSWC) is the more profitable company, earning 43.
1% net margin versus -4. 0% for U. S. Global Investors, Inc. — meaning it keeps 43. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CSWC leads at 48. 5% versus -35. 3% for GROW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DHIL leads at 96. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HNNA or SAMG or GROW or DHIL or CSWC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
(DHIL) trades at 9. 5x forward P/E versus 11. 9x for Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc. — 2. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — HNNA or SAMG or GROW or DHIL or CSWC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Capital Southwest Corporation (CSWC) offers the highest yield at 10. 2%, versus 3. 5% for U. S. Global Investors, Inc. (GROW).
09Is HNNA or SAMG or GROW or DHIL or CSWC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Hennessy Advisors, Inc.
(HNNA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 30), 5. 3% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HNNA: -35. 0%, SAMG: +61. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HNNA and SAMG and GROW and DHIL and CSWC?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: HNNA is a small-cap high-growth stock; SAMG is a small-cap income-oriented stock; GROW is a small-cap income-oriented stock; DHIL is a small-cap deep-value stock; CSWC is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.