Specialty Retail
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
HOUR vs FLXS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
HOUR vs FLXS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Retail | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances |
| Market Cap | $94M | $295M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $141M | $458M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $835K | $22M |
| Gross Margin | 50.9% | 23.2% |
| Operating Margin | 0.6% | 6.1% |
| Forward P/E | 142.2x | 11.9x |
| Total Debt | $726K | $59M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $40M |
HOUR vs FLXS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hour Loop, Inc. (HOUR) | 100 | 82.6 | -17.4% |
| Flexsteel Industrie… (FLXS) | 100 | 221.4 | +121.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HOUR vs FLXS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HOUR is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.48
- Rev growth 4.6%, EPS growth 127.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 30.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.48, Low D/E 14.1%, current ratio 1.27x
FLXS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 51.4% 10Y total return vs HOUR's -66.7%
- 6.9% revenue growth vs HOUR's 4.6%
- Lower P/E (11.9x vs 142.2x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.9% revenue growth vs HOUR's 4.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.9x vs 142.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 4.8% margin vs HOUR's 0.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.48 vs FLXS's 1.51, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +119.8% vs FLXS's +80.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.5% ROA vs HOUR's 2.6%, ROIC 9.9% vs 10.3% |
HOUR vs FLXS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
HOUR vs FLXS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FLXS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FLXS is the larger business by revenue, generating $458M annually — 3.3x HOUR's $141M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 4.8% (FLXS) to 0.6% (HOUR).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $141M | $458M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1M | $31M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $834,945 | $22M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1M | $28M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +50.9% | +23.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +0.6% | +6.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.6% | +4.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.0% | +6.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.6% | +9.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -25.4% | -27.2% |
Valuation Metrics
FLXS leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.5x trailing earnings, FLXS trades at a 89% valuation discount to HOUR's 142.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, FLXS's 10.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HOUR's 108.4x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $94M | $295M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $92M | $314M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 142.25x | 15.54x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 11.90x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 108.43x | 10.38x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.68x | 0.67x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 18.11x | 1.87x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 337.57x | 8.74x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FLXS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FLXS delivers a 12.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $11 for HOUR. HOUR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.14x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FLXS's 0.35x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FLXS scores 8/9 vs HOUR's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.9% | +12.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.6% | +7.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.3% | +9.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.6% | +12.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.14x | 0.35x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1M | $19M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $40M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $725,507 | $59M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 6.47x | 380.21x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FLXS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FLXS five years ago would be worth $11,954 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,329 for HOUR. Over the past 12 months, HOUR leads with a +119.8% total return vs FLXS's +80.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FLXS at 50.7% vs HOUR's 12.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +43.8% | +38.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +119.8% | +80.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +41.5% | +242.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -66.7% | +19.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -66.7% | +51.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +12.3% | +50.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HOUR and FLXS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HOUR is the less volatile stock with a 1.48 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FLXS's 1.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FLXS currently trades 92.0% from its 52-week high vs HOUR's 38.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.48x | 1.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.84 | $59.95 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.17 | $29.38 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +38.9% | +92.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.6 | 60.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 26K | 47K |
Analyst Outlook
HOUR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
FLXS is the only dividend payer here at 1.14% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $54.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.63 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.0% |
FLXS leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). HOUR leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
HOUR vs FLXS: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HOUR or FLXS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Flexsteel Industries, Inc.
(FLXS) is the stronger pick with 6. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 6% for Hour Loop, Inc. (HOUR). Flexsteel Industries, Inc. (FLXS) offers the better valuation at 15. 5x trailing P/E (11. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HOUR or FLXS?
On trailing P/E, Flexsteel Industries, Inc.
(FLXS) is the cheapest at 15. 5x versus Hour Loop, Inc. at 142. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HOUR or FLXS?
Over the past 5 years, Flexsteel Industries, Inc.
(FLXS) delivered a total return of +19. 5%, compared to -66. 7% for Hour Loop, Inc. (HOUR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FLXS returned +51. 4% versus HOUR's -66. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HOUR or FLXS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hour Loop, Inc.
(HOUR) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 48β versus Flexsteel Industries, Inc. 's 1. 51β — meaning FLXS is approximately 2% more volatile than HOUR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Hour Loop, Inc. (HOUR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 14% versus 35% for Flexsteel Industries, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HOUR or FLXS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Flexsteel Industries, Inc.
(FLXS) is pulling ahead at 6. 9% versus 4. 6% for Hour Loop, Inc. (HOUR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hour Loop, Inc. grew EPS 127. 0% year-over-year, compared to 85. 9% for Flexsteel Industries, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HOUR leads at 30. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HOUR or FLXS?
Flexsteel Industries, Inc.
(FLXS) is the more profitable company, earning 4. 6% net margin versus 0. 5% for Hour Loop, Inc. — meaning it keeps 4. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FLXS leads at 6. 0% versus 0. 5% for HOUR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HOUR leads at 52. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — HOUR or FLXS?
In this comparison, FLXS (1.
1% yield) pays a dividend. HOUR does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is HOUR or FLXS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Flexsteel Industries, Inc.
(FLXS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FLXS: +51. 4%, HOUR: -66. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between HOUR and FLXS?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: HOUR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FLXS is a small-cap deep-value stock. FLXS pays a dividend while HOUR does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.