Specialty Retail
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
HOUR vs FLXS vs LESL vs W
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Home Improvement
Specialty Retail
HOUR vs FLXS vs LESL vs W — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Retail | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | Home Improvement | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $84M | $299M | $15M | $8.72B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $141M | $458M | $1.21B | $12.66B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $835K | $22M | $-275M | $-305M |
| Gross Margin | 50.9% | 23.2% | 34.5% | 30.1% |
| Operating Margin | 0.6% | 6.1% | -0.2% | 1.1% |
| Forward P/E | 128.3x | 11.8x | — | 24.3x |
| Total Debt | $726K | $59M | $1.01B | $4.07B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $40M | $64M | $1.48B |
HOUR vs FLXS vs LESL vs W — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hour Loop, Inc. (HOUR) | 100 | 74.5 | -25.5% |
| Flexsteel Industrie… (FLXS) | 100 | 224.2 | +124.2% |
| Leslie's, Inc. (LESL) | 100 | 0.4 | -99.6% |
| Wayfair Inc. (W) | 100 | 42.5 | -57.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HOUR vs FLXS vs LESL vs W
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HOUR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.29
- Lower volatility, beta 1.29, Low D/E 14.1%, current ratio 1.27x
- Beta 1.29 vs W's 2.72
FLXS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 6.9%, EPS growth 85.9%, 3Y rev CAGR -6.8%
- 53.0% 10Y total return vs W's 67.1%
- Beta 1.45, yield 1.1%, current ratio 2.78x
- 6.9% revenue growth vs LESL's -6.6%
LESL lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
W is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +97.0% vs LESL's -88.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.9% revenue growth vs LESL's -6.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.8x vs 24.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 4.8% margin vs LESL's -22.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.29 vs W's 2.72 | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +97.0% vs LESL's -88.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.5% ROA vs LESL's -42.4%, ROIC 9.9% vs 1.6% |
HOUR vs FLXS vs LESL vs W — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
HOUR vs FLXS vs LESL vs W — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FLXS leads in 4 of 6 categories
HOUR leads 1 • LESL leads 0 • W leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FLXS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
W is the larger business by revenue, generating $12.7B annually — 89.9x HOUR's $141M. FLXS is the more profitable business, keeping 4.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LESL's -22.7%. On growth, FLXS holds the edge at +9.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $141M | $458M | $1.2B | $12.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1M | $31M | $6M | $428M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $834,945 | $22M | -$275M | -$305M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1M | $28M | $8M | $456M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +50.9% | +23.2% | +34.5% | +30.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +0.6% | +6.1% | -0.2% | +1.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.6% | +4.8% | -22.7% | -2.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.0% | +6.1% | +0.6% | +3.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.6% | +9.8% | -16.0% | +7.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -25.4% | -27.2% | -85.8% | +10.1% |
Valuation Metrics
FLXS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.7x trailing earnings, FLXS trades at a 88% valuation discount to HOUR's 128.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, FLXS's 10.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HOUR's 97.7x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $84M | $299M | $15M | $8.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $83M | $318M | $963M | $11.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 128.34x | 15.73x | -0.06x | -27.38x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 11.79x | — | 24.29x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 97.67x | 10.50x | 20.29x | 35.13x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.61x | 0.68x | 0.01x | 0.70x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 16.34x | 1.89x | — | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 304.58x | 8.85x | — | 18.79x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FLXS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FLXS delivers a 12.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $11 for HOUR. HOUR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.14x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FLXS's 0.35x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FLXS scores 8/9 vs LESL's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.9% | +12.2% | — | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.6% | +7.5% | -42.4% | -9.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.3% | +9.9% | +1.6% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.6% | +12.3% | +2.1% | +1.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 8 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.14x | 0.35x | — | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1M | $19M | $948M | $2.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $40M | $64M | $1.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $725,507 | $59M | $1.0B | $4.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 6.47x | 380.21x | -3.06x | -0.63x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FLXS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FLXS five years ago would be worth $12,952 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $29 for LESL. Over the past 12 months, W leads with a +97.0% total return vs LESL's -88.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FLXS at 51.3% vs LESL's -80.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +29.7% | +40.4% | -6.9% | -37.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +79.1% | +77.1% | -88.5% | +97.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +27.7% | +246.5% | -99.3% | +65.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -70.0% | +29.5% | -99.7% | -79.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -70.0% | +53.0% | -99.6% | +67.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +8.5% | +51.3% | -80.6% | +18.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HOUR and FLXS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HOUR is the less volatile stock with a 1.29 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than W's 2.72 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FLXS currently trades 93.1% from its 52-week high vs LESL's 8.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.29x | 1.45x | 2.31x | 2.72x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.84 | $59.95 | $18.56 | $119.98 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.18 | $29.38 | $0.87 | $30.85 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +35.1% | +93.1% | +8.7% | +55.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 66.7 | 60.7 | 44.0 | 39.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 27K | 47K | 134K | 3.5M |
Analyst Outlook
HOUR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Consensus price targets imply 50.1% upside for W (target: $99) vs -3.3% for FLXS (target: $54). FLXS is the only dividend payer here at 1.12% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $54.00 | — | $99.43 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | — | 57 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.1% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.63 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.9% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
FLXS leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). HOUR leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
HOUR vs FLXS vs LESL vs W: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HOUR or FLXS or LESL or W a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Flexsteel Industries, Inc.
(FLXS) is the stronger pick with 6. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 6% for Leslie's, Inc. (LESL). Flexsteel Industries, Inc. (FLXS) offers the better valuation at 15. 7x trailing P/E (11. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Wayfair Inc. (W) a "Buy" — based on 57 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HOUR or FLXS or LESL or W?
On trailing P/E, Flexsteel Industries, Inc.
(FLXS) is the cheapest at 15. 7x versus Hour Loop, Inc. at 128. 3x. On forward P/E, Flexsteel Industries, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HOUR or FLXS or LESL or W?
Over the past 5 years, Flexsteel Industries, Inc.
(FLXS) delivered a total return of +29. 5%, compared to -99. 7% for Leslie's, Inc. (LESL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: W returned +67. 1% versus LESL's -99. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HOUR or FLXS or LESL or W?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hour Loop, Inc.
(HOUR) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 29β versus Wayfair Inc. 's 2. 72β — meaning W is approximately 110% more volatile than HOUR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Hour Loop, Inc. (HOUR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 14% versus 35% for Flexsteel Industries, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HOUR or FLXS or LESL or W?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Flexsteel Industries, Inc.
(FLXS) is pulling ahead at 6. 9% versus -6. 6% for Leslie's, Inc. (LESL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hour Loop, Inc. grew EPS 127. 0% year-over-year, compared to -881. 2% for Leslie's, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HOUR leads at 30. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HOUR or FLXS or LESL or W?
Flexsteel Industries, Inc.
(FLXS) is the more profitable company, earning 4. 6% net margin versus -19. 1% for Leslie's, Inc. — meaning it keeps 4. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FLXS leads at 6. 0% versus 0. 1% for W. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HOUR leads at 52. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HOUR or FLXS or LESL or W more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Flexsteel Industries, Inc.
(FLXS) trades at 11. 8x forward P/E versus 24. 3x for Wayfair Inc. — 12. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for W: 50. 1% to $99. 43.
08Which pays a better dividend — HOUR or FLXS or LESL or W?
In this comparison, FLXS (1.
1% yield) pays a dividend. HOUR, LESL, W do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is HOUR or FLXS or LESL or W better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Flexsteel Industries, Inc.
(FLXS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1. 1% yield). Leslie's, Inc. (LESL) carries a higher beta of 2. 31 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FLXS: +53. 0%, LESL: -99. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HOUR and FLXS and LESL and W?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: HOUR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FLXS is a small-cap deep-value stock; LESL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; W is a small-cap quality compounder stock. FLXS pays a dividend while HOUR, LESL, W do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.