Aerospace & Defense
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
HOVR vs JOBY vs ACHR vs EVTL vs WKHS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Airlines, Airports & Air Services
Aerospace & Defense
Aerospace & Defense
Auto - Manufacturers
HOVR vs JOBY vs ACHR vs EVTL vs WKHS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Airlines, Airports & Air Services | Aerospace & Defense | Aerospace & Defense | Auto - Manufacturers |
| Market Cap | $97M | $9.83B | $4.67B | $274M | $32M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $78M | $300K | $0.00 | $11M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-31M | $-957M | $-618M | $-245M | $-64M |
| Gross Margin | — | 11.2% | — | — | -236.8% |
| Operating Margin | — | -10.2% | -2431.0% | — | -5.6% |
| Forward P/E | 17.7x | — | — | — | — |
| Total Debt | $30K | $61M | $42M | $191M | $16M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $8M | $241M | $1.02B | $70M | $4M |
HOVR vs JOBY vs ACHR vs EVTL vs WKHS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| New Horizon Aircraf… (HOVR) | 100 | 23.2 | -76.8% |
| Joby Aviation, Inc. (JOBY) | 100 | 251.0 | +151.0% |
| Archer Aviation Inc. (ACHR) | 100 | 327.3 | +227.3% |
| Vertical Aerospace … (EVTL) | 100 | 15.3 | -84.7% |
| Workhorse Group Inc. (WKHS) | 100 | 1.5 | -98.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HOVR vs JOBY vs ACHR vs EVTL vs WKHS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HOVR has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in momentum.
- +352.2% vs EVTL's -35.0%
JOBY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 391.8%, EPS growth -29.9%
- -4.8% 10Y total return vs ACHR's -37.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.70, Low D/E 4.3%, current ratio 24.09x
- Beta 2.70, current ratio 24.09x
ACHR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for efficiency.
- -32.9% ROA vs EVTL's -229.7%
EVTL is the clearest fit if your priority is quality.
- 2.5% margin vs ACHR's -2.1K%
WKHS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- beta 1.46
- Beta 1.46 vs EVTL's 3.45
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 391.8% revenue growth vs HOVR's -414.1% | |
| Quality / Margins | 2.5% margin vs ACHR's -2.1K% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.46 vs EVTL's 3.45 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +352.2% vs EVTL's -35.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -32.9% ROA vs EVTL's -229.7% |
HOVR vs JOBY vs ACHR vs EVTL vs WKHS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
HOVR vs JOBY vs ACHR vs EVTL vs WKHS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
WKHS leads in 2 of 6 categories
ACHR leads 1 • HOVR leads 0 • JOBY leads 0 • EVTL leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WKHS leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JOBY and EVTL operate at a comparable scale, with $78M and $0 in trailing revenue. WKHS is the more profitable business, keeping -6.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ACHR's -2060.7%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $78M | $300,000 | $0 | $11M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$18M | -$759M | -$709M | -$146M | -$52M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$31M | -$957M | -$618M | -$245M | -$64M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$11M | -$661M | -$512M | -$97M | -$33M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +11.2% | — | — | -2.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -10.2% | -2431.0% | — | -5.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -12.3% | -2060.7% | — | -6.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -8.5% | -1705.7% | — | -3.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | -5.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | -9.1% | +43.5% | -106.9% | +95.9% |
Valuation Metrics
WKHS leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $97M | $9.8B | $4.7B | $274M | $32M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $91M | $9.6B | $3.7B | $439M | $44M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 17.66x | -8.85x | -6.34x | -3.52x | -0.07x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 183.94x | 9999.00x | — | 4.83x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 35.65x | 5.86x | 1.78x | — | 0.16x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ACHR leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ACHR delivers a -37.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-38 in annual profit, vs $-2 for HOVR. HOVR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WKHS's 0.37x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ACHR scores 5/9 vs WKHS's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.2% | -74.2% | -37.8% | — | -198.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -121.4% | -52.1% | -32.9% | -2.3% | -60.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -54.7% | -89.6% | — | -77.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.5% | -49.8% | -44.3% | — | -107.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.04x | 0.02x | — | 0.37x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$8M | -$180M | -$979M | $121M | $12M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $8M | $241M | $1.0B | $70M | $4M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $30,000 | $61M | $42M | $191M | $16M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | — | -42.65x | -3.84x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — HOVR and JOBY and ACHR each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JOBY five years ago would be worth $10,096 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $15 for WKHS. Over the past 12 months, HOVR leads with a +352.2% total return vs EVTL's -35.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ACHR at 43.2% vs WKHS's -75.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +35.0% | -30.4% | -22.8% | -54.0% | -34.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +352.2% | +55.7% | -26.6% | -35.0% | +236.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -78.6% | +128.7% | +193.5% | -84.2% | -98.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -78.5% | +1.0% | -36.3% | -97.3% | -99.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -78.5% | -4.8% | -37.0% | -97.2% | -99.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -40.2% | +31.8% | +43.2% | -46.0% | -75.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HOVR and WKHS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WKHS is the less volatile stock with a 1.46 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than EVTL's 3.45 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HOVR currently trades 52.6% from its 52-week high vs WKHS's 30.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.06x | 2.84x | 2.95x | 3.55x | 1.61x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.18 | $20.95 | $14.62 | $7.60 | $11.80 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.45 | $6.32 | $4.80 | $1.90 | $0.53 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +52.6% | +47.7% | +43.0% | +35.3% | +30.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 73.4 | 65.5 | 61.5 | 51.9 | 72.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 994K | 24.7M | 27.6M | 3.1M | 167K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HOVR as "Buy", JOBY as "Hold", ACHR as "Buy", EVTL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 301.1% upside for EVTL (target: $11) vs 54.3% for JOBY (target: $15).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $15.42 | $12.33 | $10.75 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 8 | 9 | 8 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.6% |
WKHS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). ACHR leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
HOVR vs JOBY vs ACHR vs EVTL vs WKHS: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HOVR or JOBY or ACHR or EVTL or WKHS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Joby Aviation, Inc.
(JOBY) is the stronger pick with 391. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -49. 5% for Workhorse Group Inc. (WKHS). New Horizon Aircraft Ltd. (HOVR) offers the better valuation at 17. 7x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate New Horizon Aircraft Ltd. (HOVR) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — HOVR or JOBY or ACHR or EVTL or WKHS?
Over the past 5 years, Joby Aviation, Inc.
(JOBY) delivered a total return of +1. 0%, compared to -99. 8% for Workhorse Group Inc. (WKHS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JOBY returned +3. 5% versus WKHS's -99. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — HOVR or JOBY or ACHR or EVTL or WKHS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Workhorse Group Inc.
(WKHS) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 61β versus Vertical Aerospace Ltd. 's 3. 55β — meaning EVTL is approximately 120% more volatile than WKHS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, New Horizon Aircraft Ltd. (HOVR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 37% for Workhorse Group Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — HOVR or JOBY or ACHR or EVTL or WKHS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Joby Aviation, Inc.
(JOBY) is pulling ahead at 391. 8% versus -49. 5% for Workhorse Group Inc. (WKHS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: New Horizon Aircraft Ltd. grew EPS 122. 4% year-over-year, compared to -29. 9% for Joby Aviation, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — HOVR or JOBY or ACHR or EVTL or WKHS?
New Horizon Aircraft Ltd.
(HOVR) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -2060. 7% for Archer Aviation Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HOVR leads at 0. 0% versus -2431. 0% for ACHR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HOVR leads at 0. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — HOVR or JOBY or ACHR or EVTL or WKHS?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is HOVR or JOBY or ACHR or EVTL or WKHS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Workhorse Group Inc.
(WKHS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Vertical Aerospace Ltd. (EVTL) carries a higher beta of 3. 55 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (WKHS: -99. 8%, EVTL: -97. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between HOVR and JOBY and ACHR and EVTL and WKHS?
These companies operate in different sectors (HOVR (Industrials) and JOBY (Industrials) and ACHR (Industrials) and EVTL (Industrials) and WKHS (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: HOVR is a small-cap deep-value stock; JOBY is a small-cap high-growth stock; ACHR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; EVTL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; WKHS is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.