HSAI
Hesai Group
Auto - Parts
Market Cap$2.21B
5Y Perf.+16.8%
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
HSAI vs AEVA vs LAZR vs OUST
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
AEVA
Aeva Technologies, Inc.
Auto - Parts
Market Cap$860M
5Y Perf.+52.6%
LAZR
Luminar Technologies, Inc.
Auto - Parts
Market Cap$2M
5Y Perf.-99.9%
OUST
Ouster, Inc.
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Market Cap$1.56B
5Y Perf.+104.3%
HSAI vs AEVA vs LAZR vs OUST — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | HSAI | AEVA | LAZR | OUST |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Parts | Auto - Parts | Auto - Parts | Hardware, Equipment & Parts |
| Market Cap | $2.21B | $860M | $2M | $1.56B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.74B | $21M | $76M | $185M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $428M | $-146M | $-234M | $-56M |
| Gross Margin | 41.3% | 4.6% | -21.3% | 49.0% |
| Operating Margin | 4.2% | -6.3% | -332.8% | -37.4% |
| Forward P/E | 5.7x | — | — | — |
| Total Debt | $739M | $102M | $535M | $17M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2.84B | $72M | $83M | $67M |
HSAI vs AEVA vs LAZR vs OUST — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
HSAI
AEVA
LAZR
OUST
| Stock | Feb 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hesai Group (HSAI) | 100 | 116.8 | +16.8% |
| Aeva Technologies, … (AEVA) | 100 | 152.6 | +52.6% |
| Luminar Technologie… (LAZR) | 100 | 0.1 | -99.9% |
| Ouster, Inc. (OUST) | 100 | 204.3 | +104.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HSAI vs AEVA vs LAZR vs OUST
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: HSAI leads in 2 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. Aeva Technologies, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. LAZR and OUST also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
HSAI
Hesai Group
The Quality Compounder
HSAI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and efficiency.
- 15.6% margin vs AEVA's -6.9%
- 5.9% ROA vs AEVA's -113.9%, ROIC -6.5% vs -162.8%
Best for: quality and efficiency
AEVA
Aeva Technologies, Inc.
The Growth Play
AEVA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 99.4%, EPS growth 10.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 62.8%
- 172.4% 10Y total return vs HSAI's 3.8%
- 99.4% revenue growth vs LAZR's 8.0%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
LAZR
Luminar Technologies, Inc.
The Income Pick
LAZR is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 2.40
- Lower volatility, beta 2.40, current ratio 4.05x
- Beta 2.40, current ratio 4.05x
- Beta 2.40 vs AEVA's 3.75
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
OUST
Ouster, Inc.
The Momentum Pick
OUST is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +196.7% vs LAZR's -98.4%
Best for: momentum
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | AEVA | 99.4% revenue growth vs LAZR's 8.0% |
| Quality / Margins | HSAI | 15.6% margin vs AEVA's -6.9% |
| Stability / Safety | LAZR | Beta 2.40 vs AEVA's 3.75 |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | OUST | +196.7% vs LAZR's -98.4% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | HSAI | 5.9% ROA vs AEVA's -113.9%, ROIC -6.5% vs -162.8% |
HSAI vs AEVA vs LAZR vs OUST — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2024
FY 2021
FY 2024
FY 2024
HSAI vs AEVA vs LAZR vs OUST — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLHSAILAGGINGLAZR
Who Leads Where
HSAI leads in 3 of 6 categories
OUST leads 1 • AEVA leads 0 • LAZR leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓LAZRLuminar Technologies,…
0leads
AEVAAeva Technologies, In…
0leads
OUSTOuster, Inc.
1leads
HSAIHesai Group
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs OUSTvs AEVAMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
HSAI4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
HSAI2/3
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
HSAI6/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
OUST3/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HSAI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HSAI is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.7B annually — 130.8x AEVA's $21M. HSAI is the more profitable business, keeping 15.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AEVA's -6.9%. On growth, AEVA holds the edge at +85.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | HSAIHesai Group | AEVAAeva Technologies… | LAZRLuminar Technolog… | OUSTOuster, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.7B | $21M | $76M | $185M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $264M | -$123M | -$229M | -$60M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $428M | -$146M | -$234M | -$56M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | -$117M | -$209M | -$69M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +41.3% | +4.6% | -21.3% | +49.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.2% | -6.3% | -3.3% | -37.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.6% | -6.9% | -3.1% | -30.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -10.0% | -5.6% | -2.8% | -37.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +46.7% | +85.9% | +21.0% | +48.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.3% | +12.5% | -2.6% | +33.3% |
HSAI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
HSAI leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | HSAIHesai Group | AEVAAeva Technologies… | LAZRLuminar Technolog… | OUSTOuster, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.2B | $860M | $2M | $1.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.9B | $890M | $454M | $1.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -188.31x | -5.36x | -0.01x | -22.91x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 5.69x | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 7.24x | 47.56x | 0.03x | 9.21x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.89x | 58.94x | — | 5.28x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — |
HSAI leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HSAI leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HSAI delivers a 8.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $-3 for AEVA. OUST carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AEVA's 7.75x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), OUST scores 6/9 vs LAZR's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | HSAIHesai Group | AEVAAeva Technologies… | LAZRLuminar Technolog… | OUSTOuster, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.0% | -2.6% | — | -22.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.9% | -113.9% | -81.0% | -15.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -6.5% | -162.8% | -123.6% | -30.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -4.7% | -101.2% | -118.7% | -31.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.19x | 7.75x | — | 0.07x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$2.1B | $30M | $452M | -$50M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.8B | $72M | $83M | $67M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $739M | $102M | $535M | $17M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 11.97x | 10.40x | -3.73x | — |
HSAI leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
OUST leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HSAI five years ago would be worth $10,385 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2 for LAZR. Over the past 12 months, OUST leads with a +196.7% total return vs LAZR's -98.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors OUST at 76.5% vs LAZR's -91.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | HSAIHesai Group | AEVAAeva Technologies… | LAZRLuminar Technolog… | OUSTOuster, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -9.2% | +7.1% | -24.1% | +4.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +35.0% | +50.6% | -98.4% | +196.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +132.3% | +123.9% | -99.9% | +449.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +3.8% | -70.9% | -100.0% | -76.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +3.8% | +17235.0% | -100.0% | -74.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +32.4% | +30.8% | -91.4% | +76.5% |
OUST leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HSAI and LAZR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LAZR is the less volatile stock with a 2.40 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AEVA's 3.75 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HSAI currently trades 70.9% from its 52-week high vs LAZR's 1.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | HSAIHesai Group | AEVAAeva Technologies… | LAZRLuminar Technolog… | OUSTOuster, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.52x | 3.75x | 2.40x | 3.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $30.85 | $38.80 | $4.82 | $41.65 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $14.69 | $8.53 | $0.05 | $8.08 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +70.9% | +35.2% | +1.3% | +58.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.9 | 58.2 | 36.2 | 67.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.8M | 1.5M | 418K | 2.3M |
Evenly matched — HSAI and LAZR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HSAI as "Buy", AEVA as "Buy", OUST as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 51.0% upside for OUST (target: $37) vs 44.1% for HSAI (target: $32).
| Metric | HSAIHesai Group | AEVAAeva Technologies… | LAZRLuminar Technolog… | OUSTOuster, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $31.50 | $20.00 | — | $37.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 8 | — | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
HSAI leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). OUST leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
Best OverallHesai Group (HSAI)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
HSAI vs AEVA vs LAZR vs OUST: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HSAI or AEVA or LAZR or OUST a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Aeva Technologies, Inc.
(AEVA) is the stronger pick with 99. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 8. 0% for Luminar Technologies, Inc. (LAZR). Analysts rate Hesai Group (HSAI) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — HSAI or AEVA or LAZR or OUST?
Over the past 5 years, Hesai Group (HSAI) delivered a total return of +3.
8%, compared to -100. 0% for Luminar Technologies, Inc. (LAZR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AEVA returned +172. 4% versus LAZR's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — HSAI or AEVA or LAZR or OUST?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Luminar Technologies, Inc.
(LAZR) is the lower-risk stock at 2. 40β versus Aeva Technologies, Inc. 's 3. 75β — meaning AEVA is approximately 56% more volatile than LAZR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ouster, Inc. (OUST) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 8% for Aeva Technologies, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — HSAI or AEVA or LAZR or OUST?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Aeva Technologies, Inc.
(AEVA) is pulling ahead at 99. 4% versus 8. 0% for Luminar Technologies, Inc. (LAZR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hesai Group grew EPS 79. 3% year-over-year, compared to 10. 5% for Aeva Technologies, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AEVA leads at 62. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — HSAI or AEVA or LAZR or OUST?
Hesai Group (HSAI) is the more profitable company, earning -4.
9% net margin versus -804. 4% for Aeva Technologies, Inc. — meaning it keeps -4. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HSAI leads at -9. 9% versus -705. 8% for AEVA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — OUST leads at 49. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is HSAI or AEVA or LAZR or OUST more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for OUST: 51.
0% to $37. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — HSAI or AEVA or LAZR or OUST?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is HSAI or AEVA or LAZR or OUST better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Aeva Technologies, Inc.
(AEVA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+172. 4% 10Y return). Luminar Technologies, Inc. (LAZR) carries a higher beta of 2. 40 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AEVA: +172. 4%, LAZR: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between HSAI and AEVA and LAZR and OUST?
These companies operate in different sectors (HSAI (Consumer Cyclical) and AEVA (Consumer Cyclical) and LAZR (Consumer Cyclical) and OUST (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: HSAI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AEVA is a small-cap high-growth stock; LAZR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; OUST is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
Revenue Growth>
%
(HSAI: 46.7% · AEVA: 85.9%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.