Medical - Distribution
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
HSIC vs DBVT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
HSIC vs DBVT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Distribution | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $8.13B | $1690.08T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $13.18B | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $398M | $-168M |
| Gross Margin | 29.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | 5.8% | — |
| Forward P/E | 13.2x | — |
| Total Debt | $3.69B | $22M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $156M | $194M |
HSIC vs DBVT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Henry Schein, Inc. (HSIC) | 100 | 116.6 | +16.6% |
| DBV Technologies S.… (DBVT) | 100 | 40.7 | -59.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HSIC vs DBVT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HSIC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.72
- Rev growth 4.0%, EPS growth 7.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 1.4%
- 5.8% 10Y total return vs DBVT's -87.1%
DBVT is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +100.5% vs HSIC's +2.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.0% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.0% margin vs DBVT's 0.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.72 vs DBVT's 1.26 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +100.5% vs HSIC's +2.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.6% ROA vs DBVT's -89.0% |
HSIC vs DBVT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
HSIC vs DBVT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DBVT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HSIC and DBVT operate at a comparable scale, with $13.2B and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $13.2B | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.1B | -$112M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $398M | -$168M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $561M | -$151M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +29.1% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.8% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.0% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.3% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.7% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +14.9% | +91.5% |
Valuation Metrics
DBVT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $8.1B | $1690.08T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $11.7B | $1690.08T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 21.66x | -0.75x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.25x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 6.87x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.90x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.62x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.80x | 0.65x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 14.18x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
HSIC leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HSIC delivers a 8.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $-130 for DBVT. DBVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HSIC's 0.77x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.2% | -130.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.6% | -89.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.1% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.8% | -145.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.77x | 0.13x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.5B | -$172M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $156M | $194M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.7B | $22M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.59x | -189.82x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
DBVT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HSIC five years ago would be worth $8,536 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,172 for DBVT. Over the past 12 months, DBVT leads with a +100.5% total return vs HSIC's +2.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DBVT at 5.7% vs HSIC's -3.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -7.8% | +3.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +2.8% | +100.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -11.3% | +18.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -14.6% | -68.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +5.8% | -87.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -3.9% | +5.7% |
Risk & Volatility
HSIC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HSIC is the less volatile stock with a 0.72 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DBVT's 1.26 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HSIC currently trades 79.3% from its 52-week high vs DBVT's 75.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.72x | 1.26x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $89.29 | $26.18 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $61.95 | $7.53 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +79.3% | +75.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 34.3 | 47.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.2M | 252K |
Analyst Outlook
HSIC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates HSIC as "Hold" and DBVT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 134.8% upside for DBVT (target: $46) vs 20.6% for HSIC (target: $85).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $85.43 | $46.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 32 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +10.5% | 0.0% |
DBVT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). HSIC leads in 3 (Profitability & Efficiency, Risk & Volatility).
HSIC vs DBVT: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HSIC or DBVT a better buy right now?
Henry Schein, Inc.
(HSIC) offers the better valuation at 21. 7x trailing P/E (13. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate DBV Technologies S. A. (DBVT) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — HSIC or DBVT?
Over the past 5 years, Henry Schein, Inc.
(HSIC) delivered a total return of -14. 6%, compared to -68. 3% for DBV Technologies S. A. (DBVT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HSIC returned +5. 8% versus DBVT's -87. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — HSIC or DBVT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Henry Schein, Inc.
(HSIC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 72β versus DBV Technologies S. A. 's 1. 26β — meaning DBVT is approximately 74% more volatile than HSIC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, DBV Technologies S. A. (DBVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 77% for Henry Schein, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — HSIC or DBVT?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Henry Schein, Inc.
grew EPS 7. 2% year-over-year, compared to -347. 5% for DBV Technologies S. A.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — HSIC or DBVT?
Henry Schein, Inc.
(HSIC) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 0% net margin versus 0. 0% for DBV Technologies S. A. — meaning it keeps 3. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HSIC leads at 5. 7% versus 0. 0% for DBVT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HSIC leads at 29. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is HSIC or DBVT more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DBVT: 134.
8% to $46. 33.
07Which pays a better dividend — HSIC or DBVT?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is HSIC or DBVT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Henry Schein, Inc.
(HSIC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 72)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HSIC: +5. 8%, DBVT: -87. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between HSIC and DBVT?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.