Industrial - Distribution
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
HTLM vs FLXS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
HTLM vs FLXS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Distribution | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances |
| Market Cap | $165M | $295M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $235M | $458M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $10M | $22M |
| Gross Margin | 27.7% | 23.2% |
| Operating Margin | 4.8% | 6.1% |
| Forward P/E | 13.1x | 11.9x |
| Total Debt | $14M | $59M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $21M | $40M |
HTLM vs FLXS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| HomesToLife Ltd (HTLM) | 100 | 43.6 | -56.4% |
| Flexsteel Industrie… (FLXS) | 100 | 94.7 | -5.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HTLM vs FLXS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HTLM is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.21
- Rev growth 91.6%, EPS growth 227.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 264.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.21, Low D/E 64.2%, current ratio 1.19x
FLXS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 51.4% 10Y total return vs HTLM's -52.7%
- Lower P/E (11.9x vs 13.1x)
- 4.8% margin vs HTLM's 4.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 91.6% revenue growth vs FLXS's 6.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.9x vs 13.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 4.8% margin vs HTLM's 4.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.21 vs FLXS's 1.51 | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +80.1% vs HTLM's -48.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.4% ROA vs FLXS's 7.5%, ROIC 123.8% vs 9.9% |
HTLM vs FLXS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
HTLM vs FLXS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FLXS leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FLXS is the larger business by revenue, generating $458M annually — 1.9x HTLM's $235M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 4.8% (FLXS) to 4.4% (HTLM).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $235M | $458M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $15M | $31M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $10M | $22M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $3M | $28M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +27.7% | +23.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.8% | +6.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.4% | +4.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.3% | +6.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +9.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -27.2% |
Valuation Metrics
HTLM leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.1x trailing earnings, HTLM trades at a 16% valuation discount to FLXS's 15.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, HTLM's 9.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FLXS's 10.4x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $165M | $295M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $157M | $314M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.11x | 15.54x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 11.90x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.41x | 10.38x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.57x | 0.67x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 7.60x | 1.87x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 17.42x | 8.74x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HTLM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HTLM delivers a 80.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $80 in annual profit, vs $12 for FLXS. FLXS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.35x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HTLM's 0.64x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FLXS scores 8/9 vs HTLM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +80.4% | +12.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +15.4% | +7.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +123.8% | +9.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +92.6% | +12.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.64x | 0.35x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$7M | $19M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $21M | $40M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $14M | $59M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 17.25x | 380.21x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FLXS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FLXS five years ago would be worth $11,954 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,726 for HTLM. Over the past 12 months, FLXS leads with a +80.1% total return vs HTLM's -48.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FLXS at 50.7% vs HTLM's -22.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -21.5% | +38.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -48.7% | +80.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -52.7% | +242.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -52.7% | +19.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -52.7% | +51.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -22.1% | +50.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HTLM and FLXS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HTLM is the less volatile stock with a 0.21 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FLXS's 1.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FLXS currently trades 92.0% from its 52-week high vs HTLM's 43.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.21x | 1.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.19 | $59.95 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.56 | $29.38 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +43.8% | +92.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.8 | 60.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 14K | 47K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
FLXS is the only dividend payer here at 1.14% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $54.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.63 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.0% |
FLXS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). HTLM leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
HTLM vs FLXS: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HTLM or FLXS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, HomesToLife Ltd (HTLM) is the stronger pick with 91.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 9% for Flexsteel Industries, Inc. (FLXS). HomesToLife Ltd (HTLM) offers the better valuation at 13. 1x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HTLM or FLXS?
On trailing P/E, HomesToLife Ltd (HTLM) is the cheapest at 13.
1x versus Flexsteel Industries, Inc. at 15. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HTLM or FLXS?
Over the past 5 years, Flexsteel Industries, Inc.
(FLXS) delivered a total return of +19. 5%, compared to -52. 7% for HomesToLife Ltd (HTLM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FLXS returned +51. 4% versus HTLM's -52. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HTLM or FLXS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), HomesToLife Ltd (HTLM) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
21β versus Flexsteel Industries, Inc. 's 1. 51β — meaning FLXS is approximately 629% more volatile than HTLM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Flexsteel Industries, Inc. (FLXS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 35% versus 64% for HomesToLife Ltd — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HTLM or FLXS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), HomesToLife Ltd (HTLM) is pulling ahead at 91.
6% versus 6. 9% for Flexsteel Industries, Inc. (FLXS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: HomesToLife Ltd grew EPS 227. 3% year-over-year, compared to 85. 9% for Flexsteel Industries, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HTLM leads at 264. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HTLM or FLXS?
Flexsteel Industries, Inc.
(FLXS) is the more profitable company, earning 4. 6% net margin versus 4. 4% for HomesToLife Ltd — meaning it keeps 4. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FLXS leads at 6. 0% versus 5. 1% for HTLM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HTLM leads at 27. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — HTLM or FLXS?
In this comparison, FLXS (1.
1% yield) pays a dividend. HTLM does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is HTLM or FLXS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, HomesToLife Ltd (HTLM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
21)). Flexsteel Industries, Inc. (FLXS) carries a higher beta of 1. 51 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HTLM: -52. 7%, FLXS: +51. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between HTLM and FLXS?
These companies operate in different sectors (HTLM (Industrials) and FLXS (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: HTLM is a small-cap high-growth stock; FLXS is a small-cap deep-value stock. FLXS pays a dividend while HTLM does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.