Regulated Water
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
HTO vs ARTNA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Regulated Water
HTO vs ARTNA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Regulated Water | Regulated Water |
| Market Cap | $2.00B | $326M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $816M | $113M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $105M | $23M |
| Gross Margin | 55.5% | 43.2% |
| Operating Margin | 22.0% | 28.0% |
| Forward P/E | 20.8x | 15.8x |
| Total Debt | $1.98B | $183M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $21M | $52K |
HTO vs ARTNA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| H2O America (HTO) | 100 | 91.0 | -9.0% |
| Artesian Resources … (ARTNA) | 100 | 90.2 | -9.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HTO vs ARTNA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HTO is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 7.0%, EPS growth 4.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.9%
- 104.6% 10Y total return vs ARTNA's 48.5%
- Lower volatility, beta -0.21, current ratio 0.70x
ARTNA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 31 yrs, beta 0.01, yield 3.9%
- 20.2% margin vs HTO's 12.9%
- Lower D/E ratio (73.1% vs 128.3%)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.0% revenue growth vs ARTNA's 4.6% | |
| Value | PEG 3.24 vs 3.68 | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.2% margin vs HTO's 12.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Lower D/E ratio (73.1% vs 128.3%) | |
| Dividends | 3.9% yield, 31-year raise streak, vs HTO's 2.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +7.9% vs ARTNA's -3.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.8% ROA vs HTO's 2.2%, ROIC 6.3% vs 4.1% |
HTO vs ARTNA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
HTO vs ARTNA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — HTO and ARTNA each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HTO is the larger business by revenue, generating $816M annually — 7.2x ARTNA's $113M. ARTNA is the more profitable business, keeping 20.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HTO's 12.9%. On growth, HTO holds the edge at +9.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $816M | $113M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $300M | $45M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $105M | $23M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $27M | $4M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +55.5% | +43.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +22.0% | +28.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.9% | +20.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.4% | +3.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.4% | +4.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | 0.0% | +8.1% |
Valuation Metrics
ARTNA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.3x trailing earnings, ARTNA trades at a 27% valuation discount to HTO's 19.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HTO offers better value at 3.05x vs ARTNA's 3.33x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.0B | $326M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.0B | $509M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 19.58x | 14.33x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 20.80x | 15.84x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 3.05x | 3.33x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.35x | 10.29x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.50x | 2.89x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.34x | 1.31x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ARTNA leads this category, winning 8 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ARTNA delivers a 9.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $7 for HTO. ARTNA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.73x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HTO's 1.28x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.6% | +9.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.2% | +2.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.1% | +6.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.9% | +4.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.28x | 0.73x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.0B | $183M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $21M | $52,000 |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.0B | $183M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.26x | 4.10x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HTO leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HTO five years ago would be worth $10,180 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,217 for ARTNA. Over the past 12 months, HTO leads with a +7.9% total return vs ARTNA's -3.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HTO at -6.9% vs ARTNA's -13.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +17.0% | +1.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +7.9% | -3.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -19.3% | -35.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1.8% | -7.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +104.6% | +48.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -6.9% | -13.8% |
Risk & Volatility
HTO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HTO is the less volatile stock with a -0.21 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ARTNA's 0.01 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.21x | 0.01x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $61.87 | $35.37 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $43.75 | $30.50 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.4% | +89.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.2 | 49.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 648K | 69K |
Analyst Outlook
ARTNA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates HTO as "Buy" and ARTNA as "Buy". For income investors, ARTNA offers the higher dividend yield at 3.88% vs HTO's 2.85%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $62.25 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 4 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.8% | +3.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 22 | 31 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.63 | $1.23 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
ARTNA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). HTO leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
HTO vs ARTNA: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HTO or ARTNA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, H2O America (HTO) is the stronger pick with 7.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 6% for Artesian Resources Corporation (ARTNA). Artesian Resources Corporation (ARTNA) offers the better valuation at 14. 3x trailing P/E (15. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate H2O America (HTO) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HTO or ARTNA?
On trailing P/E, Artesian Resources Corporation (ARTNA) is the cheapest at 14.
3x versus H2O America at 19. 6x. On forward P/E, Artesian Resources Corporation is actually cheaper at 15. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: H2O America wins at 3. 24x versus Artesian Resources Corporation's 3. 68x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HTO or ARTNA?
Over the past 5 years, H2O America (HTO) delivered a total return of +1.
8%, compared to -7. 8% for Artesian Resources Corporation (ARTNA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HTO returned +104. 6% versus ARTNA's +48. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HTO or ARTNA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), H2O America (HTO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
21β versus Artesian Resources Corporation's 0. 01β — meaning ARTNA is approximately -106% more volatile than HTO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Artesian Resources Corporation (ARTNA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 73% versus 128% for H2O America — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HTO or ARTNA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), H2O America (HTO) is pulling ahead at 7.
0% versus 4. 6% for Artesian Resources Corporation (ARTNA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Artesian Resources Corporation grew EPS 11. 6% year-over-year, compared to 4. 7% for H2O America. Over a 3-year CAGR, HTO leads at 8. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HTO or ARTNA?
Artesian Resources Corporation (ARTNA) is the more profitable company, earning 20.
2% net margin versus 12. 8% for H2O America — meaning it keeps 20. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ARTNA leads at 31. 5% versus 22. 6% for HTO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HTO leads at 46. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HTO or ARTNA more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, H2O America (HTO) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 3. 24x versus Artesian Resources Corporation's 3. 68x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Artesian Resources Corporation (ARTNA) trades at 15. 8x forward P/E versus 20. 8x for H2O America — 5. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — HTO or ARTNA?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Artesian Resources Corporation (ARTNA) offers the highest yield at 3. 9%, versus 2. 8% for H2O America (HTO).
09Is HTO or ARTNA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, H2O America (HTO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
21), 2. 8% yield, +104. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HTO: +104. 6%, ARTNA: +48. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HTO and ARTNA?
Both stocks operate in the Utilities sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: HTO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ARTNA is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.