Renewable Utilities
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
HTOO vs LIN vs APD vs PLUG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Chemicals - Specialty
Chemicals - Specialty
Electrical Equipment & Parts
HTOO vs LIN vs APD vs PLUG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Renewable Utilities | Chemicals - Specialty | Chemicals - Specialty | Electrical Equipment & Parts |
| Market Cap | $62M | $232.56B | $66.84B | $4.61B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5M | $34.66B | $12.46B | $710M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-31M | $7.13B | $2.11B | $-1.63B |
| Gross Margin | -198.6% | 46.0% | 32.0% | 99.8% |
| Operating Margin | -7.9% | 28.8% | 18.4% | 38.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | 28.1x | 22.9x | — |
| Total Debt | $2M | $26.99B | $18.41B | $997M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $214K | $5.06B | $1.86B | $1M |
HTOO vs LIN vs APD vs PLUG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fusion Fuel Green P… (HTOO) | 100 | 0.5 | -99.5% |
| Linde plc (LIN) | 100 | 190.5 | +90.5% |
| Air Products and Ch… (APD) | 100 | 109.9 | +9.9% |
| Plug Power Inc. (PLUG) | 100 | 9.8 | -90.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HTOO vs LIN vs APD vs PLUG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HTOO lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
LIN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 376.9% 10Y total return vs APD's 166.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.24, Low D/E 67.9%, current ratio 0.88x
- 20.6% margin vs HTOO's -6.6%
- Beta 0.24 vs PLUG's 2.57, lower leverage
APD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 29 yrs, beta 0.45, yield 2.4%
- Beta 0.45, yield 2.4%, current ratio 1.38x
- Better valuation composite
- 2.4% yield, 29-year raise streak, vs LIN's 1.2%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
PLUG is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 12.9%, EPS growth 100.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 0.4%
- 12.9% revenue growth vs HTOO's -61.3%
- +320.2% vs HTOO's -66.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.9% revenue growth vs HTOO's -61.3% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.6% margin vs HTOO's -6.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.24 vs PLUG's 2.57, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.4% yield, 29-year raise streak, vs LIN's 1.2%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +320.2% vs HTOO's -66.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.3% ROA vs HTOO's -73.2%, ROIC 11.3% vs -96.5% |
HTOO vs LIN vs APD vs PLUG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
HTOO vs LIN vs APD vs PLUG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
APD leads in 2 of 6 categories
LIN leads 2 • PLUG leads 1 • HTOO leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PLUG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LIN is the larger business by revenue, generating $34.7B annually — 7341.9x HTOO's $5M. LIN is the more profitable business, keeping 20.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HTOO's -6.6%. On growth, PLUG holds the edge at +17.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5M | $34.7B | $12.5B | $710M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$36M | $12.1B | $3.9B | -$1.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$31M | $7.1B | $2.1B | -$1.6B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$18M | $5.1B | $1.1B | -$2M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -198.6% | +46.0% | +32.0% | +99.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -7.9% | +28.8% | +18.4% | +38.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -6.6% | +20.6% | +16.9% | -2.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -3.8% | +14.7% | +8.9% | -0.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +8.2% | +8.8% | +17.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +52.5% | +13.4% | +141.1% | +95.9% |
Valuation Metrics
APD leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, LIN's 20.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than APD's 121.4x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $62M | $232.6B | $66.8B | $4.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $65M | $254.5B | $83.4B | $5.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3.83x | 34.40x | -169.61x | — |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 28.12x | 22.86x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.36x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 20.04x | 121.35x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 33.06x | 6.84x | 5.55x | 6.49x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.96x | 5.92x | 3.86x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 45.70x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
LIN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LIN delivers a 17.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $-11 for HTOO. HTOO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.21x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PLUG's 19.75x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LIN scores 6/9 vs APD's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -11.4% | +17.8% | +11.9% | -124.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -73.2% | +8.3% | +5.1% | -64.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -96.5% | +11.3% | -2.0% | +10.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -92.6% | +13.0% | -2.4% | +18.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.21x | 0.68x | 1.06x | 19.75x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2M | $21.9B | $16.6B | $996M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $214,000 | $5.1B | $1.9B | $1M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $27.0B | $18.4B | $997M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -32.36x | 34.52x | 12.00x | -36.18x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LIN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LIN five years ago would be worth $17,813 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $89 for HTOO. Over the past 12 months, PLUG leads with a +320.2% total return vs HTOO's -66.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LIN at 12.4% vs HTOO's -68.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -5.9% | +17.3% | +21.3% | +48.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -66.2% | +13.6% | +14.9% | +320.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.9% | +41.9% | +8.8% | -64.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.1% | +78.1% | +13.8% | -85.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.6% | +376.9% | +166.7% | +72.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -68.4% | +12.4% | +2.8% | -29.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LIN and APD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LIN is the less volatile stock with a 0.24 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PLUG's 2.57 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. APD currently trades 97.7% from its 52-week high vs HTOO's 24.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.28x | 0.24x | 0.45x | 2.57x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $13.62 | $521.28 | $307.29 | $4.58 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.41 | $387.78 | $229.11 | $0.69 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +24.7% | +96.3% | +97.7% | +72.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.4 | 50.6 | 61.2 | 63.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 223K | 2.3M | 1.2M | 76.7M |
Analyst Outlook
APD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: LIN as "Buy", APD as "Buy", PLUG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 18.1% upside for PLUG (target: $4) vs 4.2% for APD (target: $313). For income investors, APD offers the higher dividend yield at 2.37% vs LIN's 1.20%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $539.71 | $312.78 | $3.91 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 28 | 42 | 38 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.2% | +2.4% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 6 | 29 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $6.00 | $7.11 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
APD leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). LIN leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
HTOO vs LIN vs APD vs PLUG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HTOO or LIN or APD or PLUG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Plug Power Inc.
(PLUG) is the stronger pick with 12. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -61. 3% for Fusion Fuel Green PLC (HTOO). Linde plc (LIN) offers the better valuation at 34. 4x trailing P/E (28. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Linde plc (LIN) a "Buy" — based on 28 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HTOO or LIN or APD or PLUG?
On forward P/E, Air Products and Chemicals, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 22. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HTOO or LIN or APD or PLUG?
Over the past 5 years, Linde plc (LIN) delivered a total return of +78.
1%, compared to -99. 1% for Fusion Fuel Green PLC (HTOO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LIN returned +376. 9% versus HTOO's -99. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HTOO or LIN or APD or PLUG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Linde plc (LIN) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
24β versus Plug Power Inc. 's 2. 57β — meaning PLUG is approximately 968% more volatile than LIN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Fusion Fuel Green PLC (HTOO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 21% versus 20% for Plug Power Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HTOO or LIN or APD or PLUG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Plug Power Inc.
(PLUG) is pulling ahead at 12. 9% versus -61. 3% for Fusion Fuel Green PLC (HTOO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Plug Power Inc. grew EPS 100. 0% year-over-year, compared to -110. 3% for Air Products and Chemicals, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LIN leads at 0. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HTOO or LIN or APD or PLUG?
Linde plc (LIN) is the more profitable company, earning 20.
3% net margin versus -858. 9% for Fusion Fuel Green PLC — meaning it keeps 20. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PLUG leads at 38. 1% versus -1070. 5% for HTOO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PLUG leads at 99. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HTOO or LIN or APD or PLUG more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Air Products and Chemicals, Inc.
(APD) trades at 22. 9x forward P/E versus 28. 1x for Linde plc — 5. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PLUG: 18. 1% to $3. 91.
08Which pays a better dividend — HTOO or LIN or APD or PLUG?
In this comparison, APD (2.
4% yield), LIN (1. 2% yield) pay a dividend. HTOO, PLUG do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is HTOO or LIN or APD or PLUG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Linde plc (LIN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
24), 1. 2% yield, +376. 9% 10Y return). Plug Power Inc. (PLUG) carries a higher beta of 2. 57 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LIN: +376. 9%, PLUG: +72. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HTOO and LIN and APD and PLUG?
These companies operate in different sectors (HTOO (Utilities) and LIN (Basic Materials) and APD (Basic Materials) and PLUG (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
LIN, APD pay a dividend while HTOO, PLUG do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.