Renewable Utilities
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
HTOO vs PLUG vs BE vs FCEL vs BLDP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Industrial - Machinery
HTOO vs PLUG vs BE vs FCEL vs BLDP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Renewable Utilities | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Industrial - Machinery |
| Market Cap | $63M | $4.36B | $62.18B | $646M | $1.41B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5M | $710M | $2.45B | $170M | $99M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-31M | $-1.63B | $6M | $-183M | $-91M |
| Gross Margin | -198.6% | 99.8% | 31.1% | -15.9% | 5.5% |
| Operating Margin | -7.9% | 38.1% | 8.2% | -67.6% | -104.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 123.6x | — | — |
| Total Debt | $2M | $997M | $2.99B | $144M | $22M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $214K | $1M | $2.45B | $295M | $526M |
HTOO vs PLUG vs BE vs FCEL vs BLDP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fusion Fuel Green P… (HTOO) | 100 | 0.5 | -99.5% |
| Plug Power Inc. (PLUG) | 100 | 9.2 | -90.8% |
| Bloom Energy Corpor… (BE) | 100 | 902.4 | +802.4% |
| FuelCell Energy, In… (FCEL) | 100 | 3.7 | -96.3% |
| Ballard Power Syste… (BLDP) | 100 | 20.1 | -79.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HTOO vs PLUG vs BE vs FCEL vs BLDP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HTOO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if stability is your priority.
- Beta 1.28 vs BE's 3.61, lower leverage
Among these 5 stocks, PLUG doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
BE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 9.3% 10Y total return vs BLDP's 231.0%
- 0.2% margin vs HTOO's -6.6%
- +14.6% vs HTOO's -64.4%
- 0.2% ROA vs HTOO's -73.2%, ROIC 4.1% vs -96.5%
FCEL ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 2.91, yield 1.0%
- Beta 2.91, yield 1.0%, current ratio 6.63x
- 1.0% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
BLDP is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 45.0%, EPS growth 72.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.27, Low D/E 3.8%, current ratio 9.86x
- 45.0% revenue growth vs HTOO's -61.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 45.0% revenue growth vs HTOO's -61.3% | |
| Quality / Margins | 0.2% margin vs HTOO's -6.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.28 vs BE's 3.61, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.0% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +14.6% vs HTOO's -64.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 0.2% ROA vs HTOO's -73.2%, ROIC 4.1% vs -96.5% |
HTOO vs PLUG vs BE vs FCEL vs BLDP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
HTOO vs PLUG vs BE vs FCEL vs BLDP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BE leads in 2 of 6 categories
FCEL leads 2 • HTOO leads 0 • PLUG leads 0 • BLDP leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BE is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.4B annually — 518.8x HTOO's $5M. BE is the more profitable business, keeping 0.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HTOO's -6.6%. On growth, BE holds the edge at +130.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5M | $710M | $2.4B | $170M | $99M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$36M | -$1.5B | $240M | -$84M | -$100M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$31M | -$1.6B | $6M | -$183M | -$91M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$18M | -$2M | $233M | -$126M | -$66M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -198.6% | +99.8% | +31.1% | -15.9% | +5.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -7.9% | +38.1% | +8.2% | -67.6% | -104.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -6.6% | -2.3% | +0.2% | -108.0% | -91.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -3.8% | -0.3% | +9.5% | -74.2% | -66.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +17.6% | +130.4% | +60.7% | +37.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +52.5% | +95.9% | +3.3% | +65.5% | +59.3% |
Valuation Metrics
FCEL leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $63M | $4.4B | $62.2B | $646M | $1.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $65M | $5.4B | $62.7B | $495M | $910M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3.86x | — | -699.03x | -1.66x | -15.67x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 123.56x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 508.37x | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 33.31x | 6.14x | 30.72x | 4.08x | 13.98x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.00x | — | 78.41x | 0.43x | 2.42x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 1087.24x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — PLUG and BE and BLDP each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BE delivers a 0.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $1 in annual profit, vs $-11 for HTOO. BLDP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PLUG's 19.75x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PLUG scores 5/9 vs BE's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -11.4% | -124.4% | +0.8% | -26.8% | -14.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -73.2% | -64.3% | +0.2% | -20.1% | -12.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -96.5% | +10.9% | +4.1% | -14.0% | -68.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -92.6% | +18.6% | +2.5% | -13.8% | -12.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.21x | 19.75x | 3.77x | 0.20x | 0.04x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2M | $996M | $538M | -$151M | -$504M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $214,000 | $1M | $2.5B | $295M | $526M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $997M | $3.0B | $144M | $22M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -32.36x | -36.18x | 1.05x | -30.14x | -46.37x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BE leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BE five years ago would be worth $111,339 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $88 for HTOO. Over the past 12 months, BE leads with a +1464.7% total return vs HTOO's -64.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BE at 148.0% vs HTOO's -68.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -5.0% | +40.4% | +162.1% | +50.3% | +75.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -64.4% | +303.6% | +1464.7% | +219.0% | +291.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.8% | -66.3% | +1425.9% | -82.9% | +2.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.1% | -86.4% | +1013.4% | -95.0% | -69.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.6% | +62.2% | +934.6% | -99.4% | +231.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -68.3% | -30.4% | +148.0% | -44.5% | +0.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HTOO and BLDP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HTOO is the less volatile stock with a 1.28 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BE's 3.61 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BLDP currently trades 96.7% from its 52-week high vs HTOO's 25.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.28x | 2.57x | 3.61x | 2.91x | 2.27x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $13.62 | $4.58 | $302.99 | $14.30 | $4.86 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.41 | $0.69 | $16.18 | $3.66 | $1.18 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +25.0% | +68.3% | +85.4% | +85.9% | +96.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.6 | 63.3 | 72.6 | 64.9 | 80.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 223K | 76.5M | 10.1M | 3.8M | 4.4M |
Analyst Outlook
FCEL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PLUG as "Buy", BE as "Buy", FCEL as "Hold", BLDP as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 24.9% upside for PLUG (target: $4) vs -42.1% for BLDP (target: $3). FCEL is the only dividend payer here at 1.01% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $3.91 | $187.56 | $8.73 | $2.72 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 38 | 31 | 19 | 25 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.0% | +1.0% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 0 | 2 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.00 | $0.12 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
BE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). FCEL leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.
HTOO vs PLUG vs BE vs FCEL vs BLDP: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HTOO or PLUG or BE or FCEL or BLDP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ballard Power Systems Inc.
(BLDP) is the stronger pick with 45. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -61. 3% for Fusion Fuel Green PLC (HTOO). Analysts rate Plug Power Inc. (PLUG) a "Buy" — based on 38 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — HTOO or PLUG or BE or FCEL or BLDP?
Over the past 5 years, Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) delivered a total return of +1013%, compared to -99.
1% for Fusion Fuel Green PLC (HTOO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BE returned +934. 6% versus HTOO's -99. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — HTOO or PLUG or BE or FCEL or BLDP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Fusion Fuel Green PLC (HTOO) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
28β versus Bloom Energy Corporation's 3. 61β — meaning BE is approximately 182% more volatile than HTOO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ballard Power Systems Inc. (BLDP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 20% for Plug Power Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — HTOO or PLUG or BE or FCEL or BLDP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ballard Power Systems Inc.
(BLDP) is pulling ahead at 45. 0% versus -61. 3% for Fusion Fuel Green PLC (HTOO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Plug Power Inc. grew EPS 100. 0% year-over-year, compared to -1414. 3% for FuelCell Energy, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BE leads at 19. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — HTOO or PLUG or BE or FCEL or BLDP?
Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) is the more profitable company, earning -4.
4% net margin versus -858. 9% for Fusion Fuel Green PLC — meaning it keeps -4. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PLUG leads at 38. 1% versus -1070. 5% for HTOO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PLUG leads at 99. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is HTOO or PLUG or BE or FCEL or BLDP more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PLUG: 24.
9% to $3. 91.
07Which pays a better dividend — HTOO or PLUG or BE or FCEL or BLDP?
In this comparison, FCEL (1.
0% yield) pays a dividend. HTOO, PLUG, BE, BLDP do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is HTOO or PLUG or BE or FCEL or BLDP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+934.
6% 10Y return). Plug Power Inc. (PLUG) carries a higher beta of 2. 57 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BE: +934. 6%, PLUG: +62. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between HTOO and PLUG and BE and FCEL and BLDP?
These companies operate in different sectors (HTOO (Utilities) and PLUG (Industrials) and BE (Industrials) and FCEL (Industrials) and BLDP (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: HTOO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PLUG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BE is a mid-cap high-growth stock; FCEL is a small-cap high-growth stock; BLDP is a small-cap high-growth stock. FCEL pays a dividend while HTOO, PLUG, BE, BLDP do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.