Medical - Healthcare Plans
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
HUM vs MOH
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Healthcare Plans
HUM vs MOH — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Healthcare Plans | Medical - Healthcare Plans |
| Market Cap | $29.57B | $10.28B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $137.20B | $45.08B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.13B | $188M |
| Gross Margin | 14.0% | 9.6% |
| Operating Margin | 1.0% | 1.2% |
| Forward P/E | 27.6x | 38.3x |
| Total Debt | $12.94B | $3.95B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4.20B | $4.25B |
HUM vs MOH — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Humana Inc. (HUM) | 100 | 60.0 | -40.0% |
| Molina Healthcare, … (MOH) | 100 | 106.3 | +6.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HUM vs MOH
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HUM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.56, Low D/E 72.9%, current ratio 0.72x
- Lower P/E (27.6x vs 38.3x)
- Lower D/E ratio (72.9% vs 97.1%)
MOH is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 11.7%, EPS growth -56.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.4%
- 334.0% 10Y total return vs HUM's 59.9%
- Beta -0.04, current ratio 1.69x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 11.7% revenue growth vs HUM's 10.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (27.6x vs 38.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Combined ratio 1.0 vs HUM's 1.0 (lower = better underwriting) | |
| Stability / Safety | Lower D/E ratio (72.9% vs 97.1%) | |
| Dividends | 1.4% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -0.8% vs MOH's -37.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.2% ROA vs MOH's 1.2%, ROIC 4.1% vs 17.4% |
HUM vs MOH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
HUM vs MOH — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HUM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HUM is the larger business by revenue, generating $137.2B annually — 3.0x MOH's $45.1B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 0.8% (HUM) to 0.4% (MOH). On growth, HUM holds the edge at +23.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $137.2B | $45.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.2B | $710M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.1B | $188M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.3B | $251M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +14.0% | +9.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.0% | +1.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.8% | +0.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.9% | +0.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +23.5% | -3.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.6% | -95.0% |
Valuation Metrics
MOH leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 22.1x trailing earnings, MOH trades at a 12% valuation discount to HUM's 25.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MOH's 10.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HUM's 16.8x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $29.6B | $10.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $38.3B | $10.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 25.03x | 22.13x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 27.59x | 38.29x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 16.83x | 10.23x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.23x | 0.23x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.68x | 2.46x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 78.87x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
HUM leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HUM delivers a 6.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $4 for MOH. HUM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.73x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MOH's 0.97x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HUM scores 5/9 vs MOH's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.2% | +4.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.2% | +1.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.1% | +17.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.0% | +9.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.73x | 0.97x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $8.7B | -$298M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4.2B | $4.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $12.9B | $4.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.08x | 2.12x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MOH leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MOH five years ago would be worth $7,490 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,650 for HUM. Over the past 12 months, HUM leads with a -0.8% total return vs MOH's -37.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MOH at -12.5% vs HUM's -21.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -6.5% | +10.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -0.8% | -37.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -52.1% | -33.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -43.5% | -25.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +59.9% | +334.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -21.7% | -12.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HUM and MOH each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MOH is the less volatile stock with a -0.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HUM's 0.56 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HUM currently trades 78.1% from its 52-week high vs MOH's 59.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.56x | -0.04x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $315.35 | $333.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $163.11 | $121.06 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +78.1% | +59.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 73.9 | 74.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.6M | 1.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates HUM as "Hold" and MOH as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply -0.1% upside for HUM (target: $246) vs -15.9% for MOH (target: $166). HUM is the only dividend payer here at 1.44% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $246.00 | $166.09 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 44 | 38 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.4% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $3.56 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.5% | +9.7% |
HUM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MOH leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.
HUM vs MOH: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HUM or MOH a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Molina Healthcare, Inc.
(MOH) is the stronger pick with 11. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 10. 1% for Humana Inc. (HUM). Molina Healthcare, Inc. (MOH) offers the better valuation at 22. 1x trailing P/E (38. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Molina Healthcare, Inc. (MOH) a "Buy" — based on 38 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HUM or MOH?
On trailing P/E, Molina Healthcare, Inc.
(MOH) is the cheapest at 22. 1x versus Humana Inc. at 25. 0x. On forward P/E, Humana Inc. is actually cheaper at 27. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HUM or MOH?
Over the past 5 years, Molina Healthcare, Inc.
(MOH) delivered a total return of -25. 1%, compared to -43. 5% for Humana Inc. (HUM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MOH returned +334. 0% versus HUM's +59. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HUM or MOH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Molina Healthcare, Inc.
(MOH) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 04β versus Humana Inc. 's 0. 56β — meaning HUM is approximately -1637% more volatile than MOH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Humana Inc. (HUM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 73% versus 97% for Molina Healthcare, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HUM or MOH?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Molina Healthcare, Inc.
(MOH) is pulling ahead at 11. 7% versus 10. 1% for Humana Inc. (HUM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Humana Inc. grew EPS -1. 4% year-over-year, compared to -56. 3% for Molina Healthcare, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MOH leads at 12. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HUM or MOH?
Molina Healthcare, Inc.
(MOH) is the more profitable company, earning 1. 0% net margin versus 0. 9% for Humana Inc. — meaning it keeps 1. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MOH leads at 1. 7% versus 1. 1% for HUM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HUM leads at 14. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HUM or MOH more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Humana Inc.
(HUM) trades at 27. 6x forward P/E versus 38. 3x for Molina Healthcare, Inc. — 10. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HUM: -0. 1% to $246. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — HUM or MOH?
In this comparison, HUM (1.
4% yield) pays a dividend. MOH does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is HUM or MOH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Molina Healthcare, Inc.
(MOH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 04), +334. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MOH: +334. 0%, HUM: +59. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HUM and MOH?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
HUM pays a dividend while MOH does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.