Industrial - Machinery
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
HURC vs MKSI vs SMTC vs FORM vs ASTE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Agricultural - Machinery
HURC vs MKSI vs SMTC vs FORM vs ASTE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Machinery | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Agricultural - Machinery |
| Market Cap | $107M | $20.25B | $11.21B | $11.28B | $1.21B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $132M | $4.07B | $1.03B | $840M | $1.48B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-14M | $327M | $29M | $68M | $26M |
| Gross Margin | 24.9% | 45.2% | 52.0% | 42.1% | 26.1% |
| Operating Margin | -8.6% | 14.8% | 12.3% | 12.7% | 3.7% |
| Forward P/E | 7.6x | 30.4x | 71.7x | 66.5x | 14.2x |
| Total Debt | $12M | $4.69B | $552M | $45M | $320M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $49M | $675M | $152M | $103M | $72M |
HURC vs MKSI vs SMTC vs FORM vs ASTE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hurco Companies, In… (HURC) | 100 | 53.3 | -46.7% |
| MKS Inc. (MKSI) | 100 | 284.8 | +184.8% |
| Semtech Corporation (SMTC) | 100 | 228.5 | +128.5% |
| FormFactor, Inc. (FORM) | 100 | 574.8 | +474.8% |
| Astec Industries, I… (ASTE) | 100 | 124.8 | +24.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HURC vs MKSI vs SMTC vs FORM vs ASTE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HURC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.86, Low D/E 6.0%, current ratio 4.33x
- Lower P/E (7.6x vs 14.2x)
- Beta 0.86 vs SMTC's 2.73, lower leverage
MKSI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 9.6%, EPS growth 55.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.5%
- 9.6% revenue growth vs HURC's -4.3%
Among these 5 stocks, SMTC doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
FORM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 19.5% 10Y total return vs MKSI's 7.5%
- 8.1% margin vs HURC's -10.8%
- +387.8% vs HURC's +11.1%
- 5.6% ROA vs HURC's -5.4%, ROIC 5.4% vs -4.4%
ASTE is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.63, yield 1.0%
- Beta 1.63, yield 1.0%, current ratio 2.49x
- 1.0% yield, vs MKSI's 0.3%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.6% revenue growth vs HURC's -4.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.6x vs 14.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.1% margin vs HURC's -10.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.86 vs SMTC's 2.73, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.0% yield, vs MKSI's 0.3%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +387.8% vs HURC's +11.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.6% ROA vs HURC's -5.4%, ROIC 5.4% vs -4.4% |
HURC vs MKSI vs SMTC vs FORM vs ASTE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
HURC vs MKSI vs SMTC vs FORM vs ASTE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FORM leads in 3 of 6 categories
HURC leads 1 • ASTE leads 1 • MKSI leads 0 • SMTC leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FORM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MKSI is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.1B annually — 30.8x HURC's $132M. FORM is the more profitable business, keeping 8.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HURC's -10.8%. On growth, FORM holds the edge at +32.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $132M | $4.1B | $1.0B | $840M | $1.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$9M | $945M | $173M | $152M | $84M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$14M | $327M | $29M | $68M | $26M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $6M | $401M | $143M | -$5M | $44M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +24.9% | +45.2% | +52.0% | +42.1% | +26.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -8.6% | +14.8% | +12.3% | +12.7% | +3.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -10.8% | +8.0% | +2.8% | +8.1% | +1.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.7% | +9.8% | +13.9% | -0.6% | +3.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | +15.2% | +12.7% | +32.0% | +20.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +19.4% | +53.2% | +67.4% | +2.2% | -90.3% |
Valuation Metrics
HURC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 31.5x trailing earnings, ASTE trades at a 85% valuation discount to FORM's 209.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ASTE's 14.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SMTC's 104.6x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $107M | $20.2B | $11.2B | $11.3B | $1.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $71M | $24.3B | $11.6B | $11.2B | $1.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -7.12x | 68.83x | -53.76x | 209.68x | 31.55x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 7.57x | 30.36x | 71.68x | 66.48x | 14.17x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 26.70x | 104.59x | 100.94x | 14.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.60x | 5.15x | 12.33x | 14.37x | 0.86x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.54x | 7.49x | 16.04x | 10.94x | 1.80x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 6.45x | 40.74x | 256.13x | 960.69x | 56.50x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FORM leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MKSI delivers a 12.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-7 for HURC. FORM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MKSI's 1.73x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MKSI scores 6/9 vs FORM's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -7.1% | +12.2% | +5.1% | +6.7% | +3.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.4% | +3.7% | +2.0% | +5.6% | +2.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -4.4% | +6.5% | +4.9% | +5.4% | +6.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -4.7% | +7.2% | +5.4% | +6.1% | +7.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.06x | 1.73x | 1.02x | 0.04x | 0.47x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$37M | $4.0B | $400M | -$58M | $248M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $49M | $675M | $152M | $103M | $72M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $12M | $4.7B | $552M | $45M | $320M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -266.46x | 2.84x | 2.45x | 252.69x | 5.48x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FORM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FORM five years ago would be worth $37,395 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,396 for HURC. Over the past 12 months, FORM leads with a +387.8% total return vs HURC's +11.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SMTC at 86.4% vs HURC's -6.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.9% | +78.8% | +61.4% | +144.4% | +19.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +11.1% | +306.1% | +253.5% | +387.8% | +40.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -19.2% | +266.0% | +547.3% | +417.3% | +31.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -46.0% | +66.5% | +89.8% | +273.9% | -20.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -36.3% | +750.6% | +460.9% | +1952.2% | +22.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -6.9% | +54.1% | +86.4% | +72.9% | +9.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HURC and SMTC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HURC is the less volatile stock with a 0.86 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SMTC's 2.73 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SMTC currently trades 95.5% from its 52-week high vs HURC's 77.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.86x | 2.64x | 2.73x | 2.02x | 1.63x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $21.46 | $326.83 | $127.19 | $159.09 | $65.65 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $13.19 | $71.49 | $33.06 | $26.08 | $36.43 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +77.6% | +92.0% | +95.5% | +90.9% | +80.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.9 | 65.3 | 69.3 | 66.5 | 39.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 20K | 1.2M | 2.4M | 1.6M | 227K |
Analyst Outlook
ASTE leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HURC as "Buy", MKSI as "Buy", SMTC as "Buy", FORM as "Hold", ASTE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply -9.3% upside for MKSI (target: $273) vs -32.1% for ASTE (target: $36). For income investors, ASTE offers the higher dividend yield at 0.97% vs MKSI's 0.29%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $272.86 | $87.44 | $123.38 | $36.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 29 | 32 | 19 | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.3% | — | — | +1.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.87 | — | — | $0.51 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.2% | 0.0% | +0.2% | 0.0% |
FORM leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). HURC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
HURC vs MKSI vs SMTC vs FORM vs ASTE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HURC or MKSI or SMTC or FORM or ASTE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, MKS Inc.
(MKSI) is the stronger pick with 9. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 3% for Hurco Companies, Inc. (HURC). Astec Industries, Inc. (ASTE) offers the better valuation at 31. 5x trailing P/E (14. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Hurco Companies, Inc. (HURC) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HURC or MKSI or SMTC or FORM or ASTE?
On trailing P/E, Astec Industries, Inc.
(ASTE) is the cheapest at 31. 5x versus FormFactor, Inc. at 209. 7x. On forward P/E, Hurco Companies, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HURC or MKSI or SMTC or FORM or ASTE?
Over the past 5 years, FormFactor, Inc.
(FORM) delivered a total return of +273. 9%, compared to -46. 0% for Hurco Companies, Inc. (HURC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FORM returned +1952% versus HURC's -36. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HURC or MKSI or SMTC or FORM or ASTE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hurco Companies, Inc.
(HURC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 86β versus Semtech Corporation's 2. 73β — meaning SMTC is approximately 217% more volatile than HURC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, FormFactor, Inc. (FORM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 173% for MKS Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HURC or MKSI or SMTC or FORM or ASTE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), MKS Inc.
(MKSI) is pulling ahead at 9. 6% versus -4. 3% for Hurco Companies, Inc. (HURC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Astec Industries, Inc. grew EPS 784. 2% year-over-year, compared to -22. 5% for FormFactor, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SMTC leads at 7. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HURC or MKSI or SMTC or FORM or ASTE?
MKS Inc.
(MKSI) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 5% net margin versus -17. 8% for Semtech Corporation — meaning it keeps 7. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MKSI leads at 14. 4% versus -5. 8% for HURC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SMTC leads at 50. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HURC or MKSI or SMTC or FORM or ASTE more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Hurco Companies, Inc.
(HURC) trades at 7. 6x forward P/E versus 71. 7x for Semtech Corporation — 64. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MKSI: -9. 3% to $272. 86.
08Which pays a better dividend — HURC or MKSI or SMTC or FORM or ASTE?
In this comparison, ASTE (1.
0% yield), MKSI (0. 3% yield) pay a dividend. HURC, SMTC, FORM do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is HURC or MKSI or SMTC or FORM or ASTE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, FormFactor, Inc.
(FORM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1952% 10Y return). Semtech Corporation (SMTC) carries a higher beta of 2. 73 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FORM: +1952%, SMTC: +460. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HURC and MKSI and SMTC and FORM and ASTE?
These companies operate in different sectors (HURC (Industrials) and MKSI (Technology) and SMTC (Technology) and FORM (Technology) and ASTE (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
ASTE pays a dividend while HURC, MKSI, SMTC, FORM do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.