Entertainment
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
HUYA vs DOYU vs FUBO vs NTES
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Internet Content & Information
Broadcasting
Electronic Gaming & Multimedia
HUYA vs DOYU vs FUBO vs NTES — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Entertainment | Internet Content & Information | Broadcasting | Electronic Gaming & Multimedia |
| Market Cap | $481M | $142M | $317M | $74.15B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6.11B | $4.20B | $2.72B | $112.25B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-153M | $-202M | $156M | $33.67B |
| Gross Margin | 12.7% | 9.2% | 11.1% | 64.3% |
| Operating Margin | -3.4% | -7.1% | -2.6% | 31.8% |
| Forward P/E | 4.0x | 4.3x | — | 1.9x |
| Total Debt | $49M | $16M | $670M | $6.39B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.19B | $1.02B | $452M | $51.52B |
HUYA vs DOYU vs FUBO vs NTES — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| HUYA Inc. (HUYA) | 100 | 20.6 | -79.4% |
| DouYu International… (DOYU) | 100 | 5.2 | -94.8% |
| fuboTV Inc. (FUBO) | 100 | 7.8 | -92.2% |
| NetEase, Inc. (NTES) | 100 | 152.9 | +52.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HUYA vs DOYU vs FUBO vs NTES
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HUYA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +26.9% vs FUBO's -65.6%
DOYU is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.10, yield 100.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.10, Low D/E 0.4%, current ratio 3.63x
- Beta 1.10, yield 100.0%, current ratio 3.63x
- 100.0% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs NTES's 2.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
FUBO is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 67.7%, EPS growth 96.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 39.2%
- 67.7% revenue growth vs DOYU's -22.8%
NTES carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 375.8% 10Y total return vs HUYA's -60.1%
- Better valuation composite
- 30.0% margin vs DOYU's -4.8%
- Beta 0.74 vs FUBO's 1.77, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 67.7% revenue growth vs DOYU's -22.8% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 30.0% margin vs DOYU's -4.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.74 vs FUBO's 1.77, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 100.0% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs NTES's 2.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +26.9% vs FUBO's -65.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.2% ROA vs DOYU's -4.7%, ROIC 23.3% vs -15.4% |
HUYA vs DOYU vs FUBO vs NTES — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
HUYA vs DOYU vs FUBO vs NTES — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NTES leads in 3 of 6 categories
FUBO leads 1 • HUYA leads 0 • DOYU leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NTES leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NTES is the larger business by revenue, generating $112.2B annually — 41.2x FUBO's $2.7B. NTES is the more profitable business, keeping 30.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to DOYU's -4.8%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6.1B | $4.2B | $2.7B | $112.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$120M | -$275M | -$14M | $38.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$153M | -$202M | $156M | $33.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | $0 | -$81M | $48.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +12.7% | +9.2% | +11.1% | +64.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.4% | -7.1% | -2.6% | +31.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.5% | -4.8% | +5.7% | +30.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -1.9% | -5.9% | -3.0% | +43.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.7% | +2.1% | +2.5% | +1.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -118.5% | +179.1% | +81.8% | -30.4% |
Valuation Metrics
FUBO leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $481M | $142M | $317M | $74.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $314M | -$5M | $534M | $67.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -103.70x | -3.31x | -44.88x | 15.63x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 3.97x | 4.28x | — | 1.86x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.67x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 12.40x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.54x | 0.23x | 0.12x | 4.61x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.67x | 0.23x | 0.12x | 3.10x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 10.44x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NTES leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NTES delivers a 20.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $20 in annual profit, vs $-6 for DOYU. DOYU carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FUBO's 0.25x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NTES scores 8/9 vs DOYU's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.4% | -6.5% | +16.2% | +20.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.7% | -4.7% | +8.1% | +15.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -1.7% | -15.4% | -3.3% | +23.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.1% | -10.3% | -4.1% | +22.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.00x | 0.25x | 0.04x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1.1B | -$1.0B | $218M | -$45.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.2B | $1.0B | $452M | $51.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $49M | $16M | $670M | $6.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | 10.35x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — HUYA and DOYU and NTES each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NTES five years ago would be worth $11,631 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $521 for FUBO. Over the past 12 months, HUYA leads with a +26.9% total return vs FUBO's -65.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DOYU at 31.1% vs FUBO's -21.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +5.6% | -31.8% | -65.3% | -19.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +26.9% | -34.2% | -65.6% | +12.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +99.7% | +125.5% | -51.7% | +37.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -60.8% | -71.6% | -94.8% | +16.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -60.1% | -78.8% | -90.3% | +375.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +25.9% | +31.1% | -21.6% | +11.2% |
Risk & Volatility
NTES leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NTES is the less volatile stock with a 0.74 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FUBO's 1.77 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NTES currently trades 73.4% from its 52-week high vs FUBO's 19.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.17x | 1.10x | 1.77x | 0.74x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.93 | $9.34 | $56.64 | $159.55 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.21 | $4.28 | $2.48 | $103.23 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +64.9% | +50.3% | +19.0% | +73.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.2 | 47.0 | 38.0 | 58.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.0M | 26K | 1.9M | 750K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — DOYU and NTES each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HUYA as "Buy", DOYU as "Hold", FUBO as "Hold", NTES as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 299.3% upside for FUBO (target: $43) vs 7.8% for HUYA (target: $3). For income investors, DOYU offers the higher dividend yield at 100.00% vs NTES's 2.62%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $3.45 | $9.03 | $43.00 | $149.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | 7 | 14 | 32 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +56.7% | +100.0% | — | +2.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 2 | — | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $12.34 | $68.16 | — | $20.90 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +7.6% | +10.9% | 0.0% | +0.1% |
NTES leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FUBO leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
HUYA vs DOYU vs FUBO vs NTES: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HUYA or DOYU or FUBO or NTES a better buy right now?
For growth investors, fuboTV Inc.
(FUBO) is the stronger pick with 67. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -22. 8% for DouYu International Holdings Limited (DOYU). NetEase, Inc. (NTES) offers the better valuation at 15. 6x trailing P/E (1. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate HUYA Inc. (HUYA) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HUYA or DOYU or FUBO or NTES?
On forward P/E, NetEase, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 1. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HUYA or DOYU or FUBO or NTES?
Over the past 5 years, NetEase, Inc.
(NTES) delivered a total return of +16. 3%, compared to -94. 8% for fuboTV Inc. (FUBO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NTES returned +375. 8% versus FUBO's -90. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HUYA or DOYU or FUBO or NTES?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NetEase, Inc.
(NTES) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 74β versus fuboTV Inc. 's 1. 77β — meaning FUBO is approximately 137% more volatile than NTES relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, DouYu International Holdings Limited (DOYU) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 25% for fuboTV Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HUYA or DOYU or FUBO or NTES?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), fuboTV Inc.
(FUBO) is pulling ahead at 67. 7% versus -22. 8% for DouYu International Holdings Limited (DOYU). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: fuboTV Inc. grew EPS 96. 3% year-over-year, compared to -969. 4% for DouYu International Holdings Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, FUBO leads at 39. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HUYA or DOYU or FUBO or NTES?
NetEase, Inc.
(NTES) is the more profitable company, earning 30. 0% net margin versus -7. 0% for DouYu International Holdings Limited — meaning it keeps 30. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NTES leads at 31. 8% versus -13. 2% for DOYU. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NTES leads at 64. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HUYA or DOYU or FUBO or NTES more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, NetEase, Inc.
(NTES) trades at 1. 9x forward P/E versus 4. 3x for DouYu International Holdings Limited — 2. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FUBO: 299. 3% to $43. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — HUYA or DOYU or FUBO or NTES?
In this comparison, DOYU (100.
0% yield), HUYA (56. 7% yield), NTES (2. 6% yield) pay a dividend. FUBO does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is HUYA or DOYU or FUBO or NTES better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, NetEase, Inc.
(NTES) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 74), 2. 6% yield, +375. 8% 10Y return). fuboTV Inc. (FUBO) carries a higher beta of 1. 77 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NTES: +375. 8%, FUBO: -90. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HUYA and DOYU and FUBO and NTES?
These companies operate in different sectors (HUYA (Communication Services) and DOYU (Communication Services) and FUBO (Communication Services) and NTES (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: HUYA is a small-cap income-oriented stock; DOYU is a small-cap income-oriented stock; FUBO is a small-cap high-growth stock; NTES is a mid-cap deep-value stock. HUYA, DOYU, NTES pay a dividend while FUBO does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.