Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
HWBK logo
HWBK
CZWI logo
CZWI
BFST logo
BFST
NBTB logo
NBTB
FIS logo
FIS
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

HWBK vs CZWI vs BFST vs NBTB vs FIS

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
HWBK
Hawthorn Bancshares, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$260M
5Y Perf.+115.4%
CZWI
Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$207M
5Y Perf.+212.8%
BFST
Business First Bancshares, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$956M
5Y Perf.+90.5%
NBTB
NBT Bancorp Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.52B
5Y Perf.+56.6%
FIS
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$20.26B
5Y Perf.-70.8%

HWBK vs CZWI vs BFST vs NBTB vs FIS — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
HWBK logoHWBK
CZWI logoCZWI
BFST logoBFST
NBTB logoNBTB
FIS logoFIS
IndustryBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalInformation Technology Services
Market Cap$260M$207M$956M$2.52B$20.26B
Revenue (TTM)$112M$90M$512M$902M$11.66B
Net Income (TTM)$24M$14M$88M$169M$2.67B
Gross Margin71.3%54.7%60.9%73.6%37.6%
Operating Margin26.0%7.0%22.2%24.3%17.9%
Forward P/E11.0x11.8x9.8x11.5x6.2x
Total Debt$155M$52M$551M$327M$4.01B
Cash & Equiv.$105M$119M$411M$185M$599M

HWBK vs CZWI vs BFST vs NBTB vs FISLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

HWBK
CZWI
BFST
NBTB
FIS
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Hawthorn Bancshares… (HWBK)100215.4+115.4%
Citizens Community … (CZWI)100312.8+212.8%
Business First Banc… (BFST)100190.5+90.5%
NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB)100156.6+56.6%
Fidelity National I… (FIS)10029.2-70.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: HWBK vs CZWI vs BFST vs NBTB vs FIS

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: FIS leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Hawthorn Bancshares, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility. CZWI and BFST also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇FIS emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
HWBK
Hawthorn Bancshares, Inc.
The Banking Pick

HWBK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 14 yrs, beta 0.35, yield 2.1%
  • 301.1% 10Y total return vs CZWI's 149.0%
  • NIM 3.5% vs CZWI's 2.9%
  • Beta 0.35 vs BFST's 0.79
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
CZWI
Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
The Banking Pick

CZWI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.50, Low D/E 27.6%, current ratio 3015.31x
  • +52.1% vs FIS's -49.4%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
BFST
Business First Bancshares, Inc.
The Banking Pick

BFST is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 11.8%, EPS growth 23.0%
  • 11.8% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
Best for: growth exposure
NBTB
NBT Bancorp Inc.
The Financial Play

Among these 5 stocks, NBTB doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: financial services exposure
FIS
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
The Value Pick

FIS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for valuation efficiency and defensive.

  • PEG 0.26 vs CZWI's 2.32
  • Beta 0.61, yield 4.2%, current ratio 0.59x
  • Lower P/E (6.2x vs 11.5x), PEG 0.26 vs 1.64
  • 22.9% margin vs CZWI's 16.0%
Best for: valuation efficiency and defensive
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthBFST logoBFST11.8% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
ValueFIS logoFISLower P/E (6.2x vs 11.5x), PEG 0.26 vs 1.64
Quality / MarginsFIS logoFIS22.9% margin vs CZWI's 16.0%
Stability / SafetyHWBK logoHWBKBeta 0.35 vs BFST's 0.79
DividendsFIS logoFIS4.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs HWBK's 2.1%
Momentum (1Y)CZWI logoCZWI+52.1% vs FIS's -49.4%
Efficiency (ROA)FIS logoFIS7.5% ROA vs CZWI's 0.8%, ROIC 6.0% vs 2.0%

HWBK vs CZWI vs BFST vs NBTB vs FIS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the Fintech Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the Fintech Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
HWBKHawthorn Bancshares, Inc.
FY 2025
Banking
39.9%$4M
Service
37.5%$4M
Fiduciary and Trust
22.5%$2M
CZWICitizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
FY 2025
Reportable Segment
100.0%$99M
BFSTBusiness First Bancshares, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

NBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.
FY 2025
Insurance Revenue
100.0%$18M
FISFidelity National Information Services, Inc.
FY 2025
Banking Solutions
69.5%$7.3B
Capital Market Solutions
30.5%$3.2B

HWBK vs CZWI vs BFST vs NBTB vs FIS — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLCZWILAGGINGFIS

Who Leads Where

CZWI leads in 1 of 6 categories

HWBK leads 0 • BFST leads 0 • NBTB leads 0 • FIS leads 0 • 5 tied

Explore the data ↓
FISFidelity National Inf…
0leads
NBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.
0leads
BFSTBusiness First Bancsh…
0leads
HWBKHawthorn Bancshares, …
0leads
CZWICitizens Community Ba…
1leads
6 Total Categories

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — NBTB and FIS each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

FIS is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.7B annually — 129.4x CZWI's $90M. FIS is the more profitable business, keeping 22.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CZWI's 16.0%.

MetricHWBK logoHWBKHawthorn Bancshar…CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…BFST logoBFSTBusiness First Ba…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.FIS logoFISFidelity National…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$112M$90M$512M$902M$11.7B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$31M$9M$119M$241M$4.1B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$24M$14M$88M$169M$2.7B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$23M$11M$88M$225M$2.8B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+71.3%+54.7%+60.9%+73.6%+37.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+26.0%+7.0%+22.2%+24.3%+17.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+21.2%+16.0%+17.2%+18.8%+22.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+20.4%+12.4%+17.1%+24.9%+23.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+30.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+36.4%+63.0%+39.2%+39.5%+30.6%
Evenly matched — NBTB and FIS each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — BFST and FIS each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 10.5x trailing earnings, BFST trades at a 80% valuation discount to FIS's 52.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HWBK offers better value at 0.93x vs CZWI's 2.90x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricHWBK logoHWBKHawthorn Bancshar…CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…BFST logoBFSTBusiness First Ba…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.FIS logoFISFidelity National…
Market CapShares × price$260M$207M$956M$2.5B$20.3B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$310M$140M$1.1B$2.7B$23.7B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS10.99x14.70x10.52x14.47x52.27x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.11.79x9.78x11.54x6.24x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.93x2.90x0.94x2.06x2.14x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple9.89x15.69x9.20x11.03x6.50x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.32x2.29x1.87x2.90x1.90x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.51x1.11x0.97x1.29x1.46x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF11.37x19.90x10.38x11.49x7.21x
Evenly matched — BFST and FIS each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — NBTB and FIS each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

FIS delivers a 18.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $8 for CZWI. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HWBK's 0.89x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BFST scores 7/9 vs FIS's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricHWBK logoHWBKHawthorn Bancshar…CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…BFST logoBFSTBusiness First Ba…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.FIS logoFISFidelity National…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+14.7%+7.8%+10.2%+9.5%+18.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.3%+0.8%+1.1%+1.1%+7.5%
ROICReturn on invested capital+7.1%+2.0%+6.2%+7.9%+6.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+9.2%+0.6%+8.9%+2.4%+6.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–966776
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.89x0.28x0.61x0.17x0.29x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$50M-$67M$140M$142M$3.4B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$105M$119M$411M$185M$599M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$155M$52M$551M$327M$4.0B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.92x0.16x0.59x1.05x21.16x
Evenly matched — NBTB and FIS each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

CZWI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in HWBK five years ago would be worth $19,534 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,267 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, CZWI leads with a +52.1% total return vs FIS's -49.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CZWI at 36.4% vs FIS's -6.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricHWBK logoHWBKHawthorn Bancshar…CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…BFST logoBFSTBusiness First Ba…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.FIS logoFISFidelity National…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+12.0%+24.3%+14.1%+17.6%-38.9%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+35.8%+52.1%+23.9%+18.3%-49.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+123.4%+153.7%+97.0%+48.5%-18.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+95.3%+69.0%+38.7%+44.4%-67.3%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+301.1%+149.0%+31.2%+108.5%-25.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+30.7%+36.4%+25.4%+14.1%-6.8%
CZWI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — HWBK and NBTB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

HWBK is the less volatile stock with a 0.35 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BFST's 0.79 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NBTB currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs FIS's 47.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricHWBK logoHWBKHawthorn Bancshar…CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…BFST logoBFSTBusiness First Ba…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.FIS logoFISFidelity National…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.35x0.50x0.79x0.76x0.61x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$37.98$22.62$30.32$48.27$82.74
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$27.07$12.83$22.52$39.20$37.91
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+99.3%+94.9%+96.4%+99.8%+47.4%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10057.451.264.263.130.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded8K41K175K266K5.6M
Evenly matched — HWBK and NBTB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — HWBK and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: CZWI as "Buy", BFST as "Buy", NBTB as "Hold", FIS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 60.4% upside for FIS (target: $63) vs -4.5% for NBTB (target: $46). For income investors, FIS offers the higher dividend yield at 4.16% vs CZWI's 1.73%.

MetricHWBK logoHWBKHawthorn Bancshar…CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…BFST logoBFSTBusiness First Ba…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.FIS logoFISFidelity National…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$32.33$46.00$62.88
# AnalystsCovering analysts241037
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.1%+1.7%+1.9%+3.0%+4.2%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1467131
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.78$0.37$0.57$1.43$1.63
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+1.1%+3.0%+0.4%+0.4%+7.0%
Evenly matched — HWBK and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

CZWI leads in 1 of 6 categories — strongest in Total Returns. 5 categories are tied.

Best OverallCitizens Community Bancorp,… (CZWI)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

HWBK vs CZWI vs BFST vs NBTB vs FIS: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is HWBK or CZWI or BFST or NBTB or FIS a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Business First Bancshares, Inc.

(BFST) is the stronger pick with 11. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). Business First Bancshares, Inc. (BFST) offers the better valuation at 10. 5x trailing P/E (9. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — HWBK or CZWI or BFST or NBTB or FIS?

On trailing P/E, Business First Bancshares, Inc.

(BFST) is the cheapest at 10. 5x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 52. 3x. On forward P/E, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. wins at 0. 26x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — HWBK or CZWI or BFST or NBTB or FIS?

Over the past 5 years, Hawthorn Bancshares, Inc.

(HWBK) delivered a total return of +95. 3%, compared to -67. 3% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HWBK returned +301. 1% versus FIS's -25. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — HWBK or CZWI or BFST or NBTB or FIS?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hawthorn Bancshares, Inc.

(HWBK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 35β versus Business First Bancshares, Inc. 's 0. 79β — meaning BFST is approximately 127% more volatile than HWBK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 89% for Hawthorn Bancshares, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — HWBK or CZWI or BFST or NBTB or FIS?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Business First Bancshares, Inc.

(BFST) is pulling ahead at 11. 8% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hawthorn Bancshares, Inc. grew EPS 31. 4% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — HWBK or CZWI or BFST or NBTB or FIS?

Hawthorn Bancshares, Inc.

(HWBK) is the more profitable company, earning 21. 2% net margin versus 3. 6% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 21. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HWBK leads at 26. 0% versus 7. 0% for CZWI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is HWBK or CZWI or BFST or NBTB or FIS more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 26x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) trades at 6. 2x forward P/E versus 11. 8x for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. — 5. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 60. 4% to $62. 88.

08

Which pays a better dividend — HWBK or CZWI or BFST or NBTB or FIS?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) offers the highest yield at 4. 2%, versus 1. 7% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI).

09

Is HWBK or CZWI or BFST or NBTB or FIS better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Hawthorn Bancshares, Inc.

(HWBK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 35), 2. 1% yield, +301. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HWBK: +301. 1%, BFST: +31. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between HWBK and CZWI and BFST and NBTB and FIS?

These companies operate in different sectors (HWBK (Financial Services) and CZWI (Financial Services) and BFST (Financial Services) and NBTB (Financial Services) and FIS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: HWBK is a small-cap deep-value stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock; BFST is a small-cap deep-value stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.