Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
HWBK vs CZWI vs HONE vs NBTB vs FIS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Information Technology Services
HWBK vs CZWI vs HONE vs NBTB vs FIS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $260M | $207M | $522M | $2.52B | $20.26B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $112M | $90M | $308M | $902M | $11.66B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $24M | $14M | $26M | $169M | $2.67B |
| Gross Margin | 71.3% | 54.7% | 51.9% | 73.6% | 37.6% |
| Operating Margin | 26.0% | 7.0% | 10.6% | 24.3% | 17.9% |
| Forward P/E | 11.0x | 11.8x | 13.3x | 11.5x | 6.2x |
| Total Debt | $155M | $52M | $517M | $327M | $4.01B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $105M | $119M | $231M | $185M | $599M |
HWBK vs CZWI vs HONE vs NBTB vs FIS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hawthorn Bancshares… (HWBK) | 100 | 215.4 | +115.4% |
| Citizens Community … (CZWI) | 100 | 312.8 | +212.8% |
| HarborOne Bancorp, … (HONE) | 100 | 141.7 | +41.7% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 156.6 | +56.6% |
| Fidelity National I… (FIS) | 100 | 29.2 | -70.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HWBK vs CZWI vs HONE vs NBTB vs FIS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HWBK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 14 yrs, beta 0.35, yield 2.1%
- 301.1% 10Y total return vs CZWI's 149.0%
- NIM 3.5% vs HONE's 2.2%
- Beta 0.35 vs HONE's 1.08, lower leverage
CZWI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.50, Low D/E 27.6%, current ratio 3015.31x
- +52.1% vs FIS's -49.4%
HONE is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 10.7%, EPS growth 78.4%
- 10.7% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
Among these 5 stocks, NBTB doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
FIS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for valuation efficiency and defensive.
- PEG 0.26 vs CZWI's 2.32
- Beta 0.61, yield 4.2%, current ratio 0.59x
- Lower P/E (6.2x vs 11.5x), PEG 0.26 vs 1.64
- 22.9% margin vs HONE's 8.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.7% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.2x vs 11.5x), PEG 0.26 vs 1.64 | |
| Quality / Margins | 22.9% margin vs HONE's 8.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.35 vs HONE's 1.08, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs HWBK's 2.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +52.1% vs FIS's -49.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.5% ROA vs HONE's 0.5%, ROIC 6.0% vs 2.3% |
HWBK vs CZWI vs HONE vs NBTB vs FIS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
HWBK vs CZWI vs HONE vs NBTB vs FIS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FIS leads in 1 of 6 categories
CZWI leads 1 • HWBK leads 0 • HONE leads 0 • NBTB leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — NBTB and FIS each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FIS is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.7B annually — 129.4x CZWI's $90M. FIS is the more profitable business, keeping 22.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HONE's 8.6%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $112M | $90M | $308M | $902M | $11.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $31M | $9M | $37M | $241M | $4.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $24M | $14M | $26M | $169M | $2.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $23M | $11M | $46M | $225M | $2.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +71.3% | +54.7% | +51.9% | +73.6% | +37.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +26.0% | +7.0% | +10.6% | +24.3% | +17.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +21.2% | +16.0% | +8.6% | +18.8% | +22.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +20.4% | +12.4% | +14.8% | +24.9% | +23.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | +30.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +36.4% | +63.0% | +11.1% | +39.5% | +30.6% |
Valuation Metrics
FIS leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.0x trailing earnings, HWBK trades at a 79% valuation discount to FIS's 52.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HWBK offers better value at 0.93x vs CZWI's 2.90x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $260M | $207M | $522M | $2.5B | $20.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $310M | $140M | $808M | $2.7B | $23.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 10.99x | 14.70x | 18.33x | 14.47x | 52.27x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 11.79x | 13.30x | 11.54x | 6.24x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.93x | 2.90x | 1.23x | 2.06x | 2.14x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.89x | 15.69x | 20.84x | 11.03x | 6.50x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.32x | 2.29x | 1.66x | 2.90x | 1.90x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.51x | 1.11x | 0.87x | 1.29x | 1.46x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.37x | 19.90x | 200.70x | 11.49x | 7.21x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — NBTB and FIS each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FIS delivers a 18.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $5 for HONE. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HONE's 0.90x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NBTB scores 7/9 vs FIS's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +14.7% | +7.8% | +4.6% | +9.5% | +18.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.3% | +0.8% | +0.5% | +1.1% | +7.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.1% | +2.0% | +2.3% | +7.9% | +6.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.2% | +0.6% | +3.5% | +2.4% | +6.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.89x | 0.28x | 0.90x | 0.17x | 0.29x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $50M | -$67M | $285M | $142M | $3.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $105M | $119M | $231M | $185M | $599M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $155M | $52M | $517M | $327M | $4.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.92x | 0.16x | 0.24x | 1.05x | 21.16x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CZWI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HWBK five years ago would be worth $19,534 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,267 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, CZWI leads with a +52.1% total return vs FIS's -49.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CZWI at 36.4% vs FIS's -6.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +12.0% | +24.3% | — | +17.6% | -38.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +35.8% | +52.1% | +6.6% | +18.3% | -49.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +123.4% | +153.7% | +41.3% | +48.5% | -18.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +95.3% | +69.0% | -9.8% | +44.4% | -67.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +301.1% | +149.0% | +88.3% | +108.5% | -25.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +30.7% | +36.4% | +12.2% | +14.1% | -6.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HWBK and NBTB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HWBK is the less volatile stock with a 0.35 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HONE's 1.08 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NBTB currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs FIS's 47.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.35x | 0.50x | 1.08x | 0.76x | 0.61x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $37.98 | $22.62 | $14.29 | $48.27 | $82.74 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $27.07 | $12.83 | $10.57 | $39.20 | $37.91 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.3% | +94.9% | +84.7% | +99.8% | +47.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.4 | 51.2 | 32.5 | 63.1 | 30.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 8K | 41K | 0 | 266K | 5.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — HWBK and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CZWI as "Buy", HONE as "Hold", NBTB as "Hold", FIS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 60.4% upside for FIS (target: $63) vs -4.5% for NBTB (target: $46). For income investors, FIS offers the higher dividend yield at 4.16% vs CZWI's 1.73%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $14.00 | $46.00 | $62.88 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 2 | 6 | 10 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.1% | +1.7% | +2.6% | +3.0% | +4.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 14 | 6 | 6 | 13 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.78 | $0.37 | $0.32 | $1.43 | $1.63 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.1% | +3.0% | +4.1% | +0.4% | +7.0% |
FIS leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). CZWI leads in 1 (Total Returns). 4 tied.
HWBK vs CZWI vs HONE vs NBTB vs FIS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HWBK or CZWI or HONE or NBTB or FIS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, HarborOne Bancorp, Inc.
(HONE) is the stronger pick with 10. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). Hawthorn Bancshares, Inc. (HWBK) offers the better valuation at 11. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HWBK or CZWI or HONE or NBTB or FIS?
On trailing P/E, Hawthorn Bancshares, Inc.
(HWBK) is the cheapest at 11. 0x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 52. 3x. On forward P/E, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. wins at 0. 26x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HWBK or CZWI or HONE or NBTB or FIS?
Over the past 5 years, Hawthorn Bancshares, Inc.
(HWBK) delivered a total return of +95. 3%, compared to -67. 3% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HWBK returned +301. 1% versus FIS's -25. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HWBK or CZWI or HONE or NBTB or FIS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hawthorn Bancshares, Inc.
(HWBK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 35β versus HarborOne Bancorp, Inc. 's 1. 08β — meaning HONE is approximately 209% more volatile than HWBK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 90% for HarborOne Bancorp, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HWBK or CZWI or HONE or NBTB or FIS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), HarborOne Bancorp, Inc.
(HONE) is pulling ahead at 10. 7% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: HarborOne Bancorp, Inc. grew EPS 78. 4% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HWBK or CZWI or HONE or NBTB or FIS?
Hawthorn Bancshares, Inc.
(HWBK) is the more profitable company, earning 21. 2% net margin versus 3. 6% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 21. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HWBK leads at 26. 0% versus 7. 0% for CZWI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HWBK or CZWI or HONE or NBTB or FIS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 26x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) trades at 6. 2x forward P/E versus 13. 3x for HarborOne Bancorp, Inc. — 7. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 60. 4% to $62. 88.
08Which pays a better dividend — HWBK or CZWI or HONE or NBTB or FIS?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) offers the highest yield at 4. 2%, versus 1. 7% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI).
09Is HWBK or CZWI or HONE or NBTB or FIS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Hawthorn Bancshares, Inc.
(HWBK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 35), 2. 1% yield, +301. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HWBK: +301. 1%, HONE: +88. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HWBK and CZWI and HONE and NBTB and FIS?
These companies operate in different sectors (HWBK (Financial Services) and CZWI (Financial Services) and HONE (Financial Services) and NBTB (Financial Services) and FIS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: HWBK is a small-cap deep-value stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock; HONE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.