Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
HWBK logo
HWBK
MOFG logo
MOFG
KO logo
KO
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

HWBK vs MOFG vs KO

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
HWBK
Hawthorn Bancshares, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$260M
5Y Perf.+115.4%
MOFG
MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.02B
5Y Perf.+131.6%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company

Beverages - Non-Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$355.61B
5Y Perf.+84.9%

HWBK vs MOFG vs KO — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
HWBK logoHWBK
MOFG logoMOFG
KO logoKO
IndustryBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBeverages - Non-Alcoholic
Market Cap$260M$1.02B$355.61B
Revenue (TTM)$112M$351M$49.28B
Net Income (TTM)$24M$58M$13.70B
Gross Margin71.3%63.2%61.7%
Operating Margin26.0%21.3%29.3%
Forward P/E11.0x13.8x25.3x
Total Debt$155M$117M$45.49B
Cash & Equiv.$105M$205M$10.27B

HWBK vs MOFG vs KOLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

HWBK
MOFG
KO
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Hawthorn Bancshares… (HWBK)100215.4+115.4%
MidWestOne Financia… (MOFG)100231.6+131.6%
The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO)100184.9+84.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: HWBK vs MOFG vs KO

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: HWBK and KO are tied at the top with 3 categories each — the right choice depends on your priorities. The Coca-Cola Company is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
HWBK
Hawthorn Bancshares, Inc.
The Banking Pick

HWBK has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 14 yrs, beta 0.35, yield 2.1%
  • Rev growth 2.2%, EPS growth 31.4%
  • 301.1% 10Y total return vs KO's 121.1%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
MOFG
MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc.
The Banking Pick

MOFG is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +71.2% vs KO's +17.2%
Best for: momentum
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
The Quality Compounder

KO is the clearest fit if your priority is quality and dividends.

  • 27.8% margin vs MOFG's 16.7%
  • 2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs HWBK's 2.1%
  • 13.1% ROA vs MOFG's 0.9%, ROIC 15.8% vs -9.4%
Best for: quality and dividends
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthHWBK logoHWBK2.2% NII/revenue growth vs MOFG's -23.1%
ValueHWBK logoHWBKLower P/E (11.0x vs 25.3x), PEG 0.93 vs 2.26
Quality / MarginsKO logoKO27.8% margin vs MOFG's 16.7%
Stability / SafetyHWBK logoHWBKBeta 0.35 vs MOFG's 1.34
DividendsKO logoKO2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs HWBK's 2.1%
Momentum (1Y)MOFG logoMOFG+71.2% vs KO's +17.2%
Efficiency (ROA)KO logoKO13.1% ROA vs MOFG's 0.9%, ROIC 15.8% vs -9.4%

HWBK vs MOFG vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

HWBKHawthorn Bancshares, Inc.
FY 2025
Banking
39.9%$4M
Service
37.5%$4M
Fiduciary and Trust
22.5%$2M
MOFGMidWestOne Financial Group, Inc.
FY 2024
Reportable Segment
100.0%$69M
KOThe Coca-Cola Company
FY 2025
Pacific
84.6%$31.6B
Bottling investments
15.4%$5.7B

HWBK vs MOFG vs KO — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLKOLAGGINGMOFG

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

KO leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

KO is the larger business by revenue, generating $49.3B annually — 439.7x HWBK's $112M. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MOFG's 16.7%.

MetricHWBK logoHWBKHawthorn Bancshar…MOFG logoMOFGMidWestOne Financ…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$112M$351M$49.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$31M$74M$15.5B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$24M$58M$13.7B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$23M$79M$12.6B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+71.3%+63.2%+61.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+26.0%+21.3%+29.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+21.2%+16.7%+27.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+20.4%+22.5%+25.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+12.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+36.4%+113.6%+18.2%
KO leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

HWBK leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 11.0x trailing earnings, HWBK trades at a 60% valuation discount to KO's 27.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HWBK offers better value at 0.93x vs KO's 2.43x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricHWBK logoHWBKHawthorn Bancshar…MOFG logoMOFGMidWestOne Financ…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Market CapShares × price$260M$1.0B$355.6B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$310M$929M$390.8B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS10.99x-13.93x27.18x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.13.77x25.27x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.93x2.43x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple9.89x26.39x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.32x4.94x7.42x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.51x1.50x10.40x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF11.37x16.74x67.15x
HWBK leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

KO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $10 for MOFG. MOFG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.21x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KO's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs MOFG's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricHWBK logoHWBKHawthorn Bancshar…MOFG logoMOFGMidWestOne Financ…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+14.7%+10.0%+41.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.3%+0.9%+13.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital+7.1%-9.4%+15.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+9.2%-9.5%+17.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9647
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.89x0.21x1.33x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$50M-$88M$35.2B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$105M$205M$10.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$155M$117M$45.5B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.92x0.67x10.70x
KO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

MOFG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in HWBK five years ago would be worth $19,534 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $16,560 for KO. Over the past 12 months, MOFG leads with a +71.2% total return vs KO's +17.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MOFG at 33.6% vs KO's 13.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricHWBK logoHWBKHawthorn Bancshar…MOFG logoMOFGMidWestOne Financ…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+12.0%+30.2%+20.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+35.8%+71.2%+17.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+123.4%+138.2%+47.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+95.3%+79.8%+65.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+301.1%+96.2%+121.1%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+30.7%+33.6%+13.7%
MOFG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — HWBK and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MOFG's 1.34 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.

MetricHWBK logoHWBKHawthorn Bancshar…MOFG logoMOFGMidWestOne Financ…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.35x1.34x-0.20x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$37.98$49.69$84.04
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$27.07$26.52$65.35
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+99.3%+99.2%+98.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10057.474.960.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded8K012.7M
Evenly matched — HWBK and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: MOFG as "Buy", KO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 4.2% upside for KO (target: $86) vs -36.6% for MOFG (target: $31). For income investors, KO offers the higher dividend yield at 2.46% vs MOFG's 1.97%.

MetricHWBK logoHWBKHawthorn Bancshar…MOFG logoMOFGMidWestOne Financ…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$31.25$86.13
# AnalystsCovering analysts848
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.1%+2.0%+2.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises14056
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.78$0.97$2.04
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+1.1%+0.0%+0.2%
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

KO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). HWBK leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallThe Coca-Cola Company (KO)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

HWBK vs MOFG vs KO: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is HWBK or MOFG or KO a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Hawthorn Bancshares, Inc.

(HWBK) is the stronger pick with 2. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -23. 1% for MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. (MOFG). Hawthorn Bancshares, Inc. (HWBK) offers the better valuation at 11. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. (MOFG) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — HWBK or MOFG or KO?

On trailing P/E, Hawthorn Bancshares, Inc.

(HWBK) is the cheapest at 11. 0x versus The Coca-Cola Company at 27. 2x. On forward P/E, MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — HWBK or MOFG or KO?

Over the past 5 years, Hawthorn Bancshares, Inc.

(HWBK) delivered a total return of +95. 3%, compared to +65. 6% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HWBK returned +301. 1% versus MOFG's +96. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — HWBK or MOFG or KO?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

20β versus MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. 's 1. 34β — meaning MOFG is approximately -767% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. (MOFG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 21% versus 133% for The Coca-Cola Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — HWBK or MOFG or KO?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hawthorn Bancshares, Inc.

(HWBK) is pulling ahead at 2. 2% versus -23. 1% for MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. (MOFG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hawthorn Bancshares, Inc. grew EPS 31. 4% year-over-year, compared to -366. 2% for MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — HWBK or MOFG or KO?

The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.

3% net margin versus -29. 3% for MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus -40. 8% for MOFG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HWBK leads at 71. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is HWBK or MOFG or KO more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc.

(MOFG) trades at 13. 8x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 11. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KO: 4. 2% to $86. 13.

08

Which pays a better dividend — HWBK or MOFG or KO?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

The Coca-Cola Company (KO) offers the highest yield at 2. 5%, versus 2. 0% for MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. (MOFG).

09

Is HWBK or MOFG or KO better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, MOFG: +96. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between HWBK and MOFG and KO?

These companies operate in different sectors (HWBK (Financial Services) and MOFG (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: HWBK is a small-cap deep-value stock; MOFG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.