Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

HXHX vs CLPS

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
HXHX
Haoxin Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary Shares

Trucking

IndustrialsNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$8M
5Y Perf.-70.0%
CLPS
CLPS Incorporation

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNASDAQ • HK
Market Cap$26M
5Y Perf.-5.6%

HXHX vs CLPS — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
HXHX logoHXHX
CLPS logoCLPS
IndustryTruckingInformation Technology Services
Market Cap$8M$26M
Revenue (TTM)$26M$299M
Net Income (TTM)$3M$-4M
Gross Margin25.4%22.8%
Operating Margin21.7%-1.4%
Forward P/E2.4x
Total Debt$3M$34M
Cash & Equiv.$170K$28M

HXHX vs CLPSLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

HXHX
CLPS
StockApr 25May 26Return
Haoxin Holdings Lim… (HXHX)10030.0-70.0%
CLPS Incorporation (CLPS)10094.4-5.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: HXHX vs CLPS

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: CLPS leads in 4 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. Haoxin Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary Shares is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
HXHX
Haoxin Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary Shares
The Defensive Pick

HXHX is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.79, Low D/E 18.9%, current ratio 2.24x
  • 12.4% margin vs CLPS's -1.3%
  • 10.5% ROA vs CLPS's -3.2%, ROIC 20.3% vs -7.9%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
CLPS
CLPS Incorporation
The Income Pick

CLPS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.27, yield 14.3%
  • Rev growth 15.2%, EPS growth -181.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 2.7%
  • -78.1% 10Y total return vs HXHX's -87.3%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCLPS logoCLPS15.2% revenue growth vs HXHX's -4.1%
Quality / MarginsHXHX logoHXHX12.4% margin vs CLPS's -1.3%
Stability / SafetyCLPS logoCLPSBeta 0.27 vs HXHX's 1.79
DividendsCLPS logoCLPS14.3% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)CLPS logoCLPS-3.4% vs HXHX's -68.9%
Efficiency (ROA)HXHX logoHXHX10.5% ROA vs CLPS's -3.2%, ROIC 20.3% vs -7.9%

HXHX vs CLPS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

HXHXHaoxin Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary Shares

Segment breakdown not available.

CLPSCLPS Incorporation
FY 2025
Other Member
100.0%$894,598

HXHX vs CLPS — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLCLPSLAGGINGHXHX

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

HXHX leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

CLPS is the larger business by revenue, generating $299M annually — 11.7x HXHX's $26M. HXHX is the more profitable business, keeping 12.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CLPS's -1.3%.

MetricHXHX logoHXHXHaoxin Holdings L…CLPS logoCLPSCLPS Incorporation
RevenueTrailing 12 months$26M$299M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$1M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$4M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$0
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+25.4%+22.8%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+21.7%-1.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+12.4%-1.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-15.5%-2.3%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+15.3%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+75.8%
HXHX leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

CLPS leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
MetricHXHX logoHXHXHaoxin Holdings L…CLPS logoCLPSCLPS Incorporation
Market CapShares × price$8M$26M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$11M$32M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS2.43x-3.56x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple1.84x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.30x0.16x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.42x0.44x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF
CLPS leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

HXHX leads this category, winning 8 of 8 comparable metrics.

HXHX delivers a 18.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $-6 for CLPS. HXHX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.19x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CLPS's 0.59x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HXHX scores 4/9 vs CLPS's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.

MetricHXHX logoHXHXHaoxin Holdings L…CLPS logoCLPSCLPS Incorporation
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+18.6%-6.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+10.5%-3.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital+20.3%-7.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+32.0%-9.8%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–942
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.19x0.59x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$3M$6M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$170,431$28M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$3M$34M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense29.33x
HXHX leads this category, winning 8 of 8 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

CLPS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CLPS five years ago would be worth $3,231 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,274 for HXHX. Over the past 12 months, CLPS leads with a -3.4% total return vs HXHX's -68.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CLPS at 0.7% vs HXHX's -49.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricHXHX logoHXHXHaoxin Holdings L…CLPS logoCLPSCLPS Incorporation
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-7.3%-8.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-68.9%-3.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-87.3%+2.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-87.3%-67.7%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-87.3%-78.1%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-49.7%+0.7%
CLPS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

CLPS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

CLPS is the less volatile stock with a 0.27 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HXHX's 1.79 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CLPS currently trades 49.2% from its 52-week high vs HXHX's 24.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricHXHX logoHXHXHaoxin Holdings L…CLPS logoCLPSCLPS Incorporation
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.79x0.27x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$2.11$1.88
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.33$0.80
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+24.2%+49.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10039.647.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded655K15K
CLPS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

CLPS is the only dividend payer here at 14.30% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricHXHX logoHXHXHaoxin Holdings L…CLPS logoCLPSCLPS Incorporation
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target
# AnalystsCovering analysts
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+14.3%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises3
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.13
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

CLPS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). HXHX leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency).

Best OverallCLPS Incorporation (CLPS)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

HXHX vs CLPS: Frequently Asked Questions

8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is HXHX or CLPS a better buy right now?

For growth investors, CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) is the stronger pick with 15.

2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 1% for Haoxin Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary Shares (HXHX). Haoxin Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary Shares (HXHX) offers the better valuation at 2. 4x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — HXHX or CLPS?

Over the past 5 years, CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) delivered a total return of -67.

7%, compared to -87. 3% for Haoxin Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary Shares (HXHX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CLPS returned -78. 1% versus HXHX's -87. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — HXHX or CLPS?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

27β versus Haoxin Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary Shares's 1. 79β — meaning HXHX is approximately 561% more volatile than CLPS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Haoxin Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary Shares (HXHX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 19% versus 59% for CLPS Incorporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — HXHX or CLPS?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) is pulling ahead at 15.

2% versus -4. 1% for Haoxin Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary Shares (HXHX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Haoxin Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary Shares grew EPS -19. 2% year-over-year, compared to -181. 4% for CLPS Incorporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, CLPS leads at 2. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — HXHX or CLPS?

Haoxin Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary Shares (HXHX) is the more profitable company, earning 12.

4% net margin versus -4. 3% for CLPS Incorporation — meaning it keeps 12. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HXHX leads at 21. 7% versus -4. 0% for CLPS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HXHX leads at 25. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Which pays a better dividend — HXHX or CLPS?

In this comparison, CLPS (14.

3% yield) pays a dividend. HXHX does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

07

Is HXHX or CLPS better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

27), 14. 3% yield). Haoxin Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary Shares (HXHX) carries a higher beta of 1. 79 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CLPS: -78. 1%, HXHX: -87. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

08

What are the main differences between HXHX and CLPS?

These companies operate in different sectors (HXHX (Industrials) and CLPS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: HXHX is a small-cap deep-value stock; CLPS is a small-cap high-growth stock. CLPS pays a dividend while HXHX does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

HXHX

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CLPS

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
  • Gross Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform HXHX and CLPS on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(HXHX: -4.1% · CLPS: 15.3%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.