HY vs MTW

For growth investors, The Manitowoc Company, Inc.

(MTW) is the stronger pick with 2. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -12. 5% for Hyster-Yale Materials Handling, Inc. (HY). The Manitowoc Company, Inc. (MTW) offers the better valuation at 68. 1x trailing P/E (19. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Hyster-Yale Materials Handling, Inc. (HY) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, Hyster-Yale Materials Handling, Inc.

(HY) delivered a total return of -43. 9%, compared to -50. 0% for The Manitowoc Company, Inc. (MTW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HY returned -16. 7% versus MTW's -42. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hyster-Yale Materials Handling, Inc.

(HY) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 65β versus The Manitowoc Company, Inc. 's 1. 94β — meaning MTW is approximately 17% more volatile than HY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Hyster-Yale Materials Handling, Inc. (HY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 78% versus 84% for The Manitowoc Company, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Manitowoc Company, Inc.

(MTW) is pulling ahead at 2. 9% versus -12. 5% for Hyster-Yale Materials Handling, Inc. (HY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Manitowoc Company, Inc. grew EPS -87. 2% year-over-year, compared to -142. 2% for Hyster-Yale Materials Handling, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MTW leads at 3. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

The Manitowoc Company, Inc.

(MTW) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 3% net margin versus -1. 6% for Hyster-Yale Materials Handling, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MTW leads at 2. 6% versus 0. 5% for HY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MTW leads at 18. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HY: 8.

8% to $40. 00.

In this comparison, HY (3.

9% yield) pays a dividend. MTW does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Hyster-Yale Materials Handling, Inc.

(HY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (3. 9% yield). The Manitowoc Company, Inc. (MTW) carries a higher beta of 1. 94 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HY: -16. 7%, MTW: -42. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: HY is a small-cap income-oriented stock; MTW is a small-cap quality compounder stock. HY pays a dividend while MTW does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.