Medical - Devices
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
IART vs ATRC vs HOLX vs NVCR vs SYK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Medical - Devices
IART vs ATRC vs HOLX vs NVCR vs SYK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Devices | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Devices |
| Market Cap | $1.06B | $1.41B | $16.97B | $1.92B | $112.69B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.64B | $552M | $4.13B | $674M | $25.12B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-496M | $-5M | $544M | $-173M | $3.25B |
| Gross Margin | 39.6% | 75.5% | 52.8% | 75.2% | 63.5% |
| Operating Margin | 5.8% | -0.4% | 17.5% | -27.2% | 22.4% |
| Forward P/E | 5.8x | 370.7x | 17.2x | — | 19.6x |
| Total Debt | $2.03B | $88M | $2.63B | $290M | $14.86B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $235M | $167M | $1.96B | $103M | $4.01B |
IART vs ATRC vs HOLX vs NVCR vs SYK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Integra LifeScience… (IART) | 100 | 26.0 | -74.0% |
| AtriCure, Inc. (ATRC) | 100 | 58.1 | -41.9% |
| Hologic, Inc. (HOLX) | 100 | 142.6 | +42.6% |
| NovoCure Limited (NVCR) | 100 | 25.0 | -75.0% |
| Stryker Corporation (SYK) | 100 | 150.3 | +50.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IART vs ATRC vs HOLX vs NVCR vs SYK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
IART ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Lower P/E (5.8x vs 19.6x)
ATRC is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 14.9%, EPS growth 74.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 17.4%
- 14.9% revenue growth vs IART's 1.5%
HOLX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.41, Low D/E 52.0%, current ratio 3.75x
- Beta 0.41, current ratio 3.75x
- 13.2% margin vs IART's -30.1%
- Beta 0.41 vs IART's 2.34, lower leverage
Among these 5 stocks, NVCR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
SYK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 34 yrs, beta 0.55, yield 1.1%
- 187.1% 10Y total return vs HOLX's 124.3%
- 1.1% yield; 34-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
- 6.9% ROA vs NVCR's -16.5%, ROIC 11.4% vs -16.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 14.9% revenue growth vs IART's 1.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.8x vs 19.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.2% margin vs IART's -30.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.41 vs IART's 2.34, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield; 34-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +37.1% vs SYK's -22.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.9% ROA vs NVCR's -16.5%, ROIC 11.4% vs -16.4% |
IART vs ATRC vs HOLX vs NVCR vs SYK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
IART vs ATRC vs HOLX vs NVCR vs SYK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SYK leads in 3 of 6 categories
ATRC leads 1 • IART leads 1 • HOLX leads 1 • NVCR leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ATRC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SYK is the larger business by revenue, generating $25.1B annually — 45.5x ATRC's $552M. HOLX is the more profitable business, keeping 13.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to IART's -30.1%. On growth, ATRC holds the edge at +14.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.6B | $552M | $4.1B | $674M | $25.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $209M | $13M | $974M | -$165M | $6.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$496M | -$5M | $544M | -$173M | $3.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$10M | $54M | $1000M | -$48M | $4.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +39.6% | +75.5% | +52.8% | +75.2% | +63.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.8% | -0.4% | +17.5% | -27.2% | +22.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -30.1% | -0.8% | +13.2% | -25.7% | +12.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.6% | +9.7% | +24.2% | -7.1% | +17.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.4% | +14.3% | +2.5% | +12.3% | +11.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +81.8% | +101.6% | -9.2% | -100.0% | +56.0% |
Valuation Metrics
IART leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 30.5x trailing earnings, HOLX trades at a 13% valuation discount to SYK's 35.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, IART's 13.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ATRC's 77.7x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.1B | $1.4B | $17.0B | $1.9B | $112.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.9B | $1.3B | $17.6B | $2.1B | $123.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.01x | -115.83x | 30.53x | -13.80x | 35.03x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 5.77x | 370.67x | 17.21x | — | 19.62x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 2.36x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.01x | 77.75x | 17.39x | — | 20.31x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.65x | 2.63x | 4.14x | 2.92x | 4.49x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.00x | 2.70x | 3.43x | 5.51x | 5.02x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 29.15x | 18.44x | — | 26.31x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SYK leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SYK delivers a 15.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $-51 for NVCR. ATRC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.18x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IART's 1.95x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HOLX scores 7/9 vs NVCR's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -47.6% | -1.0% | +11.0% | -50.8% | +15.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -13.7% | -0.7% | +6.1% | -16.5% | +6.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.7% | -0.6% | +9.4% | -16.4% | +11.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.2% | -0.6% | +8.8% | -28.9% | +13.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.95x | 0.18x | 0.52x | 0.85x | 0.66x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.8B | -$79M | $667M | $187M | $10.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $235M | $167M | $2.0B | $103M | $4.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.0B | $88M | $2.6B | $290M | $14.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -10.36x | 0.47x | 8.00x | -96.80x | 6.72x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SYK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SYK five years ago would be worth $12,152 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $875 for NVCR. Over the past 12 months, HOLX leads with a +37.1% total return vs SYK's -22.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SYK at 1.8% vs NVCR's -37.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +12.9% | -29.2% | +1.9% | +28.3% | -15.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +6.5% | -8.3% | +37.1% | +1.1% | -22.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -73.1% | -41.8% | -8.5% | -75.7% | +5.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -81.7% | -64.2% | +15.8% | -91.3% | +21.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -63.0% | +95.1% | +124.3% | +30.3% | +187.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -35.4% | -16.5% | -2.9% | -37.6% | +1.8% |
Risk & Volatility
HOLX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HOLX is the less volatile stock with a 0.41 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IART's 2.34 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HOLX currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs ATRC's 64.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.34x | 1.03x | 0.41x | 2.20x | 0.55x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $16.49 | $43.18 | $76.04 | $20.06 | $404.87 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.70 | $26.62 | $52.81 | $9.82 | $289.91 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +82.2% | +64.4% | +100.0% | +83.9% | +72.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 75.9 | 45.0 | 69.1 | 69.8 | 24.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 858K | 669K | 10.0M | 1.5M | 2.1M |
Analyst Outlook
SYK leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: IART as "Buy", ATRC as "Buy", HOLX as "Hold", NVCR as "Buy", SYK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 99.0% upside for NVCR (target: $34) vs -11.5% for IART (target: $12). SYK is the only dividend payer here at 1.14% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $12.00 | $50.67 | $79.00 | $33.50 | $403.69 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 26 | 19 | 42 | 15 | 50 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +1.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | — | — | 34 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $3.36 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | +0.8% | +4.4% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
SYK leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). ATRC leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow).
IART vs ATRC vs HOLX vs NVCR vs SYK: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IART or ATRC or HOLX or NVCR or SYK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, AtriCure, Inc.
(ATRC) is the stronger pick with 14. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 5% for Integra LifeSciences Holdings Corporation (IART). Hologic, Inc. (HOLX) offers the better valuation at 30. 5x trailing P/E (17. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Integra LifeSciences Holdings Corporation (IART) a "Buy" — based on 26 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — IART or ATRC or HOLX or NVCR or SYK?
On trailing P/E, Hologic, Inc.
(HOLX) is the cheapest at 30. 5x versus Stryker Corporation at 35. 0x. On forward P/E, Integra LifeSciences Holdings Corporation is actually cheaper at 5. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — IART or ATRC or HOLX or NVCR or SYK?
Over the past 5 years, Stryker Corporation (SYK) delivered a total return of +21.
5%, compared to -91. 3% for NovoCure Limited (NVCR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SYK returned +187. 1% versus IART's -63. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — IART or ATRC or HOLX or NVCR or SYK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hologic, Inc.
(HOLX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 41β versus Integra LifeSciences Holdings Corporation's 2. 34β — meaning IART is approximately 469% more volatile than HOLX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AtriCure, Inc. (ATRC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 18% versus 195% for Integra LifeSciences Holdings Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — IART or ATRC or HOLX or NVCR or SYK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), AtriCure, Inc.
(ATRC) is pulling ahead at 14. 9% versus 1. 5% for Integra LifeSciences Holdings Corporation (IART). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: AtriCure, Inc. grew EPS 74. 7% year-over-year, compared to -73. 6% for Integra LifeSciences Holdings Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, ATRC leads at 17. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — IART or ATRC or HOLX or NVCR or SYK?
Hologic, Inc.
(HOLX) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 8% net margin versus -31. 6% for Integra LifeSciences Holdings Corporation — meaning it keeps 13. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SYK leads at 19. 5% versus -23. 5% for NVCR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NVCR leads at 74. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is IART or ATRC or HOLX or NVCR or SYK more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Integra LifeSciences Holdings Corporation (IART) trades at 5.
8x forward P/E versus 370. 7x for AtriCure, Inc. — 364. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NVCR: 99. 0% to $33. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — IART or ATRC or HOLX or NVCR or SYK?
In this comparison, SYK (1.
1% yield) pays a dividend. IART, ATRC, HOLX, NVCR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is IART or ATRC or HOLX or NVCR or SYK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Stryker Corporation (SYK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
55), 1. 1% yield, +187. 1% 10Y return). Integra LifeSciences Holdings Corporation (IART) carries a higher beta of 2. 34 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SYK: +187. 1%, IART: -63. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between IART and ATRC and HOLX and NVCR and SYK?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
SYK pays a dividend while IART, ATRC, HOLX, NVCR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.