Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

IBG vs SAM vs TAP vs WVVI vs STZ

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
IBG
Innovation Beverage Group Limited

Beverages - Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNASDAQ • AU
Market Cap$1M
5Y Perf.-98.3%
SAM
The Boston Beer Company, Inc.

Beverages - Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$2.18B
5Y Perf.-29.9%
TAP
Molson Coors Beverage Company

Beverages - Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$8.10B
5Y Perf.-25.0%
WVVI
Willamette Valley Vineyards, Inc.

Beverages - Wineries & Distilleries

Consumer DefensiveNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$14M
5Y Perf.-16.8%
STZ
Constellation Brands, Inc.

Beverages - Wineries & Distilleries

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$26.05B
5Y Perf.-41.7%

IBG vs SAM vs TAP vs WVVI vs STZ — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
IBG logoIBG
SAM logoSAM
TAP logoTAP
WVVI logoWVVI
STZ logoSTZ
IndustryBeverages - AlcoholicBeverages - AlcoholicBeverages - AlcoholicBeverages - Wineries & DistilleriesBeverages - Wineries & Distilleries
Market Cap$1M$2.18B$8.10B$14M$26.05B
Revenue (TTM)$8M$2.09B$11.19B$37M$9.38B
Net Income (TTM)$-6M$-61M$-2.11B$-1M$1.11B
Gross Margin11.3%45.2%37.8%60.5%52.0%
Operating Margin-71.3%-3.8%-20.3%-2.4%34.5%
Forward P/E20.6x9.2x12.7x
Total Debt$184K$38M$6.30B$15.52B$12.11B
Cash & Equiv.$620K$223M$897M$411M$68M

IBG vs SAM vs TAP vs WVVI vs STZLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

IBG
SAM
TAP
WVVI
STZ
StockSep 24May 26Return
Innovation Beverage… (IBG)1001.7-98.3%
The Boston Beer Com… (SAM)10070.1-29.9%
Molson Coors Bevera… (TAP)10075.0-25.0%
Willamette Valley V… (WVVI)10083.2-16.8%
Constellation Brand… (STZ)10058.3-41.7%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: IBG vs SAM vs TAP vs WVVI vs STZ

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: STZ leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. The Boston Beer Company, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. TAP and WVVI also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
IBG
Innovation Beverage Group Limited
The Consumer Defensive Pick

Among these 5 stocks, IBG doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: consumer defensive exposure
SAM
The Boston Beer Company, Inc.
The Growth Play

SAM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • Rev growth 3.7%, EPS growth 95.5%, 3Y rev CAGR -0.0%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.29, Low D/E 4.5%, current ratio 1.65x
  • 3.7% revenue growth vs WVVI's -100.0%
  • -15.9% vs IBG's -95.8%
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
TAP
Molson Coors Beverage Company
The Value Play

TAP ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.

  • Lower P/E (9.2x vs 12.7x)
Best for: value
WVVI
Willamette Valley Vineyards, Inc.
The Income Pick

WVVI is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.

  • Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta -0.25, yield 100.0%
  • Beta -0.25, yield 100.0%, current ratio 2.70x
  • 100.0% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs TAP's 4.5%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Best for: income & stability and defensive
STZ
Constellation Brands, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

STZ carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.

  • 12.6% 10Y total return vs SAM's 32.0%
  • 11.8% margin vs IBG's -80.0%
  • Beta 0.26 vs IBG's 1.13
  • 5.1% ROA vs IBG's -124.5%, ROIC 13.0% vs -87.3%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthSAM logoSAM3.7% revenue growth vs WVVI's -100.0%
ValueTAP logoTAPLower P/E (9.2x vs 12.7x)
Quality / MarginsSTZ logoSTZ11.8% margin vs IBG's -80.0%
Stability / SafetySTZ logoSTZBeta 0.26 vs IBG's 1.13
DividendsWVVI logoWVVI100.0% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs TAP's 4.5%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)SAM logoSAM-15.9% vs IBG's -95.8%
Efficiency (ROA)STZ logoSTZ5.1% ROA vs IBG's -124.5%, ROIC 13.0% vs -87.3%

IBG vs SAM vs TAP vs WVVI vs STZ — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

IBGInnovation Beverage Group Limited

Segment breakdown not available.

SAMThe Boston Beer Company, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

TAPMolson Coors Beverage Company

Segment breakdown not available.

WVVIWillamette Valley Vineyards, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

STZConstellation Brands, Inc.
FY 2025
Beer
83.7%$8.5B
ConstellationWinesAndSpirits
16.3%$1.7B

IBG vs SAM vs TAP vs WVVI vs STZ — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLTAPLAGGINGWVVI

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

STZ leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

TAP is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.2B annually — 1457.1x IBG's $8M. STZ is the more profitable business, keeping 11.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to IBG's -80.0%. On growth, TAP holds the edge at +2.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricIBG logoIBGInnovation Bevera…SAM logoSAMThe Boston Beer C…TAP logoTAPMolson Coors Beve…WVVI logoWVVIWillamette Valley…STZ logoSTZConstellation Bra…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$8M$2.1B$11.2B$37M$9.4B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$5M$14M-$1.5B$2M$3.7B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$6M-$61M-$2.1B-$1M$1.1B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$3M$191M$1.2B-$3M$1.8B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+11.3%+45.2%+37.8%+60.5%+52.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-71.3%-3.8%-20.3%-2.4%+34.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-80.0%-2.9%-18.9%-3.3%+11.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-37.0%+9.1%+10.4%-8.5%+18.8%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-38.6%+1.7%+2.0%-10.9%-9.8%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+39.3%-7.4%+35.6%-94.1%-15.0%
STZ leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

TAP leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, SAM's 8.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than STZ's 9.4x.

MetricIBG logoIBGInnovation Bevera…SAM logoSAMThe Boston Beer C…TAP logoTAPMolson Coors Beve…WVVI logoWVVIWillamette Valley…STZ logoSTZConstellation Bra…
Market CapShares × price$1M$2.2B$8.1B$14M$26.1B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$966,549$2.0B$13.5B$15.1B$38.1B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.54x20.50x-3.98x-4.53x-333.89x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.20.56x9.17x12.70x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple8.45x9.37x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.48x1.04x0.73x2.55x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.54x2.54x0.80x0.00x3.82x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF10.09x7.58x13.44x
TAP leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — SAM and STZ each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

STZ delivers a 13.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $-10 for IBG. SAM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to STZ's 1.70x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SAM scores 7/9 vs WVVI's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricIBG logoIBGInnovation Bevera…SAM logoSAMThe Boston Beer C…TAP logoTAPMolson Coors Beve…WVVI logoWVVIWillamette Valley…STZ logoSTZConstellation Bra…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-10.1%-7.3%-18.6%-1.8%+13.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-124.5%-5.0%-8.9%-1.1%+5.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital-87.3%+15.5%-10.1%-2.6%+13.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-155.2%+14.8%-11.6%-3.1%+18.0%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–937415
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.07x0.04x0.60x0.23x1.70x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$435,590-$186M$5.4B$15.1B$12.0B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$619,944$223M$897M$411M$68M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$184,354$38M$6.3B$15.5B$12.1B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-13.53x-9.99x-0.69x5.47x
Evenly matched — SAM and STZ each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

TAP leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in TAP five years ago would be worth $8,585 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $116 for IBG. Over the past 12 months, SAM leads with a -15.9% total return vs IBG's -95.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TAP at -9.1% vs IBG's -77.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricIBG logoIBGInnovation Bevera…SAM logoSAMThe Boston Beer C…TAP logoTAPMolson Coors Beve…WVVI logoWVVIWillamette Valley…STZ logoSTZConstellation Bra…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-91.1%+1.5%-8.0%-8.6%+7.9%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-95.8%-15.9%-20.8%-49.3%-18.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-98.8%-35.0%-24.8%-51.0%-29.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-98.8%-81.8%-14.1%-80.8%-30.1%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-98.8%+32.0%-41.4%-59.3%+12.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-77.4%-13.4%-9.1%-21.2%-10.8%
TAP leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — SAM and WVVI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

WVVI is the less volatile stock with a -0.25 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IBG's 1.13 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SAM currently trades 76.7% from its 52-week high vs IBG's 2.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricIBG logoIBGInnovation Bevera…SAM logoSAMThe Boston Beer C…TAP logoTAPMolson Coors Beve…WVVI logoWVVIWillamette Valley…STZ logoSTZConstellation Bra…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.13x0.29x-0.01x-0.25x0.26x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$36.50$264.46$57.57$7.18$196.91
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.84$185.34$40.64$2.49$126.45
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+2.3%+76.7%+74.9%+40.3%+76.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10033.828.747.253.545.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded790K199K2.9M3K1.8M
Evenly matched — SAM and WVVI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — TAP and WVVI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: SAM as "Hold", TAP as "Hold", STZ as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 21.7% upside for SAM (target: $247) vs 12.0% for TAP (target: $48). For income investors, WVVI offers the higher dividend yield at 100.00% vs STZ's 2.68%.

MetricIBG logoIBGInnovation Bevera…SAM logoSAMThe Boston Beer C…TAP logoTAPMolson Coors Beve…WVVI logoWVVIWillamette Valley…STZ logoSTZConstellation Bra…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$246.86$48.30$175.70
# AnalystsCovering analysts313746
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+4.5%+100.0%+2.7%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0544
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.92$194.20$4.03
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+9.4%+8.0%0.0%+4.3%
Evenly matched — TAP and WVVI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

TAP leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). STZ leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 3 tied.

Best OverallMolson Coors Beverage Compa… (TAP)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

IBG vs SAM vs TAP vs WVVI vs STZ: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is IBG or SAM or TAP or WVVI or STZ a better buy right now?

For growth investors, The Boston Beer Company, Inc.

(SAM) is the stronger pick with 3. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Willamette Valley Vineyards, Inc. (WVVI). The Boston Beer Company, Inc. (SAM) offers the better valuation at 20. 5x trailing P/E (20. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ) a "Buy" — based on 46 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — IBG or SAM or TAP or WVVI or STZ?

On forward P/E, Molson Coors Beverage Company is actually cheaper at 9.

2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — IBG or SAM or TAP or WVVI or STZ?

Over the past 5 years, Molson Coors Beverage Company (TAP) delivered a total return of -14.

1%, compared to -98. 8% for Innovation Beverage Group Limited (IBG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SAM returned +32. 0% versus IBG's -98. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — IBG or SAM or TAP or WVVI or STZ?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Willamette Valley Vineyards, Inc.

(WVVI) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 25β versus Innovation Beverage Group Limited's 1. 13β — meaning IBG is approximately -551% more volatile than WVVI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Boston Beer Company, Inc. (SAM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 170% for Constellation Brands, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — IBG or SAM or TAP or WVVI or STZ?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Boston Beer Company, Inc.

(SAM) is pulling ahead at 3. 7% versus -100. 0% for Willamette Valley Vineyards, Inc. (WVVI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Boston Beer Company, Inc. grew EPS 95. 5% year-over-year, compared to -302. 8% for Molson Coors Beverage Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, STZ leads at 5. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — IBG or SAM or TAP or WVVI or STZ?

The Boston Beer Company, Inc.

(SAM) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 2% net margin versus -87. 7% for Innovation Beverage Group Limited — meaning it keeps 5. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: STZ leads at 35. 5% versus -88. 2% for IBG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WVVI leads at 60. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is IBG or SAM or TAP or WVVI or STZ more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Molson Coors Beverage Company (TAP) trades at 9.

2x forward P/E versus 20. 6x for The Boston Beer Company, Inc. — 11. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SAM: 21. 7% to $246. 86.

08

Which pays a better dividend — IBG or SAM or TAP or WVVI or STZ?

In this comparison, WVVI (100.

0% yield), TAP (4. 5% yield), STZ (2. 7% yield) pay a dividend. IBG, SAM do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is IBG or SAM or TAP or WVVI or STZ better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Willamette Valley Vineyards, Inc.

(WVVI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 25), 100. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WVVI: -59. 3%, IBG: -98. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between IBG and SAM and TAP and WVVI and STZ?

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: IBG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SAM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TAP is a small-cap income-oriented stock; WVVI is a small-cap income-oriented stock; STZ is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. TAP, WVVI, STZ pay a dividend while IBG, SAM do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

IBG

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SAM

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 27%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TAP

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 22%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

WVVI

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 36%
  • Dividend Yield > 40.0%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

STZ

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 7%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.0%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform IBG and SAM and TAP and WVVI and STZ on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(IBG: -38.6% · SAM: 1.7%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.