Investment - Banking & Investment Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
IBKR vs AMTD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
IBKR vs AMTD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Investment - Banking & Investment Services | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $37.39B | $8M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $10.23B | $54M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $984M | $188M |
| Gross Margin | 89.8% | 45.2% |
| Operating Margin | 86.0% | 48.2% |
| Forward P/E | 34.9x | 0.3x |
| Total Debt | $19M | $283M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4.96B | $63M |
IBKR vs AMTD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interactive Brokers… (IBKR) | 100 | 821.9 | +721.9% |
| AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD) | 100 | 2.6 | -97.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IBKR vs AMTD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
IBKR is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 9.8%, EPS growth 28.3%
- 8.3% 10Y total return vs AMTD's -91.4%
- 9.8% NII/revenue growth vs AMTD's -55.9%
AMTD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.06, yield 36.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.06, Low D/E 16.7%, current ratio 10.62x
- Beta 0.06, yield 36.4%, current ratio 10.62x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.8% NII/revenue growth vs AMTD's -55.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.3x vs 34.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 94.4% margin vs IBKR's 9.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.06 vs IBKR's 1.93 | |
| Dividends | 0.4% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs AMTD's 36.4% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +87.6% vs AMTD's +6.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 10.8% ROA vs IBKR's 0.5%, ROIC 1.2% vs 24.7% |
IBKR vs AMTD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
IBKR vs AMTD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IBKR leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IBKR is the larger business by revenue, generating $10.2B annually — 189.2x AMTD's $54M. AMTD is the more profitable business, keeping 94.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to IBKR's 9.6%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $10.2B | $54M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $8.9B | $263M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $984M | $188M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $15.7B | $45M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +89.8% | +45.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +86.0% | +48.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +9.6% | +94.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +153.9% | +9.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +26.0% | -88.3% |
Valuation Metrics
AMTD leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 0.3x trailing earnings, AMTD trades at a 99% valuation discount to IBKR's 37.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, IBKR's 3.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AMTD's 6.9x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $37.4B | $8M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $32.4B | $228M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 37.80x | 0.25x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 34.93x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.27x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.65x | 6.94x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.65x | 0.14x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.84x | 0.01x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 2.38x | 1.46x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IBKR leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AMTD delivers a 12.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $5 for IBKR. IBKR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AMTD's 0.17x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IBKR scores 6/9 vs AMTD's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.2% | +12.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.5% | +10.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +24.7% | +1.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +22.2% | +1.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.17x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$4.9B | $221M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5.0B | $63M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $19M | $283M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.13x | 17.18x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IBKR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IBKR five years ago would be worth $48,418 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $260 for AMTD. Over the past 12 months, IBKR leads with a +87.6% total return vs AMTD's +6.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IBKR at 64.1% vs AMTD's -40.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +24.9% | +3.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +87.6% | +6.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +341.9% | -78.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +384.2% | -97.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +828.0% | -91.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +64.1% | -40.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — IBKR and AMTD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AMTD is the less volatile stock with a 0.06 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IBKR's 1.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IBKR currently trades 99.2% from its 52-week high vs AMTD's 64.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.93x | 0.06x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $84.63 | $1.65 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $43.78 | $0.87 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.2% | +64.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 66.7 | 48.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.5M | 25K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — IBKR and AMTD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, AMTD offers the higher dividend yield at 36.35% vs IBKR's 0.36%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $87.67 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 19 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.4% | +36.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.30 | $0.39 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | 0.0% |
IBKR leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). AMTD leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
IBKR vs AMTD: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IBKR or AMTD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.
(IBKR) is the stronger pick with 9. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -55. 9% for AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD). AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD) offers the better valuation at 0. 3x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. (IBKR) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — IBKR or AMTD?
On trailing P/E, AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD) is the cheapest at 0.
3x versus Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. at 37. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — IBKR or AMTD?
Over the past 5 years, Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.
(IBKR) delivered a total return of +384. 2%, compared to -97. 4% for AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IBKR returned +857. 9% versus AMTD's -91. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — IBKR or AMTD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
06β versus Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. 's 1. 93β — meaning IBKR is approximately 2958% more volatile than AMTD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. (IBKR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 17% for AMTD IDEA Group — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — IBKR or AMTD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.
(IBKR) is pulling ahead at 9. 8% versus -55. 9% for AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. grew EPS 28. 3% year-over-year, compared to -68. 5% for AMTD IDEA Group. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — IBKR or AMTD?
AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD) is the more profitable company, earning 94.
4% net margin versus 9. 6% for Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 94. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IBKR leads at 86. 0% versus 48. 2% for AMTD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IBKR leads at 89. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — IBKR or AMTD?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD) offers the highest yield at 36. 4%, versus 0. 4% for Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. (IBKR).
08Is IBKR or AMTD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
06), 36. 4% yield). Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. (IBKR) carries a higher beta of 1. 93 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AMTD: -91. 4%, IBKR: +857. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between IBKR and AMTD?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: IBKR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; AMTD is a small-cap deep-value stock. AMTD pays a dividend while IBKR does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.