Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
IBN vs SHG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
IBN vs SHG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $95.70B | $34.14B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.95T | $39.77T |
| Net Income (TTM) | $528.91B | $5.00T |
| Gross Margin | 68.1% | 53.3% |
| Operating Margin | 24.8% | 17.9% |
| Forward P/E | 0.2x | 0.0x |
| Total Debt | $2.04T | $154.21T |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2.38T | $21.14T |
IBN vs SHG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| ICICI Bank Limited (IBN) | 100 | 307.5 | +207.5% |
| Shinhan Financial G… (SHG) | 100 | 279.6 | +179.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IBN vs SHG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
IBN is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.59, yield 0.8%
- Rev growth 25.2%, EPS growth 14.6%
- 362.5% 10Y total return vs SHG's 148.8%
SHG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for valuation efficiency and defensive.
- PEG 0.00 vs IBN's 0.01
- Beta 0.89, yield 2.6%, current ratio 0.36x
- Lower P/E (0.0x vs 0.2x), PEG 0.00 vs 0.01
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 25.2% NII/revenue growth vs SHG's 12.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.0x vs 0.2x), PEG 0.00 vs 0.01 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs IBN's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.59 vs SHG's 0.89, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.8% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs SHG's 2.6% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +90.4% vs IBN's -20.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs IBN's 0.4% |
IBN vs SHG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IBN leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SHG is the larger business by revenue, generating $39.77T annually — 13.5x IBN's $2.95T. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 17.3% (IBN) to 12.7% (SHG).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.95T | $39.77T |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $782.4B | $8.41T |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $528.9B | $5.00T |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | -$10.55T |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +68.1% | +53.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +24.8% | +17.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +17.3% | +12.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +26.3% | +15.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +14.6% | +48.3% |
Valuation Metrics
SHG leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.6x trailing earnings, SHG trades at a 46% valuation discount to IBN's 17.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), IBN offers better value at 0.48x vs SHG's 1.03x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $95.7B | $34.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $92.1B | $125.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 17.87x | 9.61x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 0.19x | 0.01x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.48x | 1.03x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.56x | 22.51x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.09x | 1.25x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.77x | 0.89x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.75x | 8.02x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IBN leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IBN delivers a 15.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $8 for SHG. IBN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.62x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SHG's 2.77x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SHG scores 9/9 vs IBN's 7/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +15.3% | +8.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.0% | +0.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.9% | +2.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.8% | +1.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 9 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.62x | 2.77x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$346.5B | $133.07T |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.38T | $21.14T |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.04T | $154.21T |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.09x | 0.41x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SHG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SHG five years ago would be worth $20,903 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $16,574 for IBN. Over the past 12 months, SHG leads with a +90.4% total return vs IBN's -20.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SHG at 39.5% vs IBN's 5.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -10.8% | +27.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -20.2% | +90.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +18.9% | +171.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +65.7% | +109.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +362.5% | +148.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +5.9% | +39.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — IBN and SHG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IBN is the less volatile stock with a 0.59 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SHG's 0.89 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SHG currently trades 93.3% from its 52-week high vs IBN's 77.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.59x | 0.89x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $34.57 | $73.40 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $25.08 | $35.96 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +77.4% | +93.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 33.3 | 56.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6.3M | 305K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — IBN and SHG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates IBN as "Buy" and SHG as "Buy". For income investors, SHG offers the higher dividend yield at 2.65% vs IBN's 0.78%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 2 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.8% | +2.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $19.86 | $2641.09 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.5% |
IBN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SHG leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 2 tied.
IBN vs SHG: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IBN or SHG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, ICICI Bank Limited (IBN) is the stronger pick with 25.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 12. 4% for Shinhan Financial Group Co. , Ltd. (SHG). Shinhan Financial Group Co. , Ltd. (SHG) offers the better valuation at 9. 6x trailing P/E (0. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ICICI Bank Limited (IBN) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — IBN or SHG?
On trailing P/E, Shinhan Financial Group Co.
, Ltd. (SHG) is the cheapest at 9. 6x versus ICICI Bank Limited at 17. 9x. On forward P/E, Shinhan Financial Group Co. , Ltd. is actually cheaper at 0. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Shinhan Financial Group Co. , Ltd. wins at 0. 00x versus ICICI Bank Limited's 0. 01x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — IBN or SHG?
Over the past 5 years, Shinhan Financial Group Co.
, Ltd. (SHG) delivered a total return of +109. 0%, compared to +65. 7% for ICICI Bank Limited (IBN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IBN returned +362. 5% versus SHG's +148. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — IBN or SHG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ICICI Bank Limited (IBN) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
59β versus Shinhan Financial Group Co. , Ltd. 's 0. 89β — meaning SHG is approximately 52% more volatile than IBN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ICICI Bank Limited (IBN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 62% versus 3% for Shinhan Financial Group Co. , Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — IBN or SHG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), ICICI Bank Limited (IBN) is pulling ahead at 25.
2% versus 12. 4% for Shinhan Financial Group Co. , Ltd. (SHG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Shinhan Financial Group Co. , Ltd. grew EPS 23. 0% year-over-year, compared to 14. 6% for ICICI Bank Limited. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — IBN or SHG?
ICICI Bank Limited (IBN) is the more profitable company, earning 17.
3% net margin versus 12. 7% for Shinhan Financial Group Co. , Ltd. — meaning it keeps 17. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IBN leads at 24. 8% versus 17. 9% for SHG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IBN leads at 68. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is IBN or SHG more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Shinhan Financial Group Co. , Ltd. (SHG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 00x versus ICICI Bank Limited's 0. 01x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Shinhan Financial Group Co. , Ltd. (SHG) trades at 0. 0x forward P/E versus 0. 2x for ICICI Bank Limited — 0. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — IBN or SHG?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Shinhan Financial Group Co. , Ltd. (SHG) offers the highest yield at 2. 6%, versus 0. 8% for ICICI Bank Limited (IBN).
09Is IBN or SHG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, ICICI Bank Limited (IBN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
59), 0. 8% yield, +362. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (IBN: +362. 5%, SHG: +148. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between IBN and SHG?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: IBN is a mid-cap high-growth stock; SHG is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.