Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

IBRX vs IMVT vs RCUS vs HALO

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
IBRX
ImmunityBio, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$7.64B
5Y Perf.+15.1%
IMVT
Immunovant, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$5.53B
5Y Perf.+6.1%
RCUS
Arcus Biosciences, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$2.50B
5Y Perf.-20.9%
HALO
Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$7.68B
5Y Perf.+168.6%

IBRX vs IMVT vs RCUS vs HALO — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
IBRX logoIBRX
IMVT logoIMVT
RCUS logoRCUS
HALO logoHALO
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnology
Market Cap$7.64B$5.53B$2.50B$7.68B
Revenue (TTM)$83M$0.00$236M$1.40B
Net Income (TTM)$-349M$-464M$-369M$317M
Gross Margin94.8%90.7%81.9%
Operating Margin-315.8%-168.6%58.4%
Forward P/E8.1x
Total Debt$504M$98K$99M$0.00
Cash & Equiv.$143M$714M$222M$134M

IBRX vs IMVT vs RCUS vs HALOLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

IBRX
IMVT
RCUS
HALO
StockMay 20May 26Return
ImmunityBio, Inc. (IBRX)100115.1+15.1%
Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT)100106.1+6.1%
Arcus Biosciences, … (RCUS)10079.1-20.9%
Halozyme Therapeuti… (HALO)100268.6+168.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: IBRX vs IMVT vs RCUS vs HALO

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: HALO leads in 3 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. ImmunityBio, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
IBRX
ImmunityBio, Inc.
The Growth Play

IBRX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.

  • Rev growth 22.7%, EPS growth 46.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 150.9%
  • 22.7% revenue growth vs IMVT's -21.3%
  • +310.6% vs HALO's -7.1%
Best for: growth exposure
IMVT
Immunovant, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

IMVT is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.37, Low D/E 0.0%, current ratio 11.16x
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
RCUS
Arcus Biosciences, Inc.
The Secondary Option

RCUS lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: healthcare exposure
HALO
Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
The Income Pick

HALO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • beta 0.56
  • 5.7% 10Y total return vs IMVT's 173.6%
  • Beta 0.56, current ratio 4.66x
  • 22.7% margin vs IBRX's -422.3%
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthIBRX logoIBRX22.7% revenue growth vs IMVT's -21.3%
Quality / MarginsHALO logoHALO22.7% margin vs IBRX's -422.3%
Stability / SafetyHALO logoHALOBeta 0.56 vs IBRX's 2.21
DividendsTieNone of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)IBRX logoIBRX+310.6% vs HALO's -7.1%
Efficiency (ROA)HALO logoHALO12.5% ROA vs IBRX's -93.2%

IBRX vs IMVT vs RCUS vs HALO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

IBRXImmunityBio, Inc.
FY 2024
Product
96.0%$14M
Product and Service, Other
4.0%$595,000
IMVTImmunovant, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

RCUSArcus Biosciences, Inc.
FY 2025
License And Development Services
87.4%$221M
Development Services
6.7%$17M
R&D Services
3.2%$8M
License
2.8%$7M
HALOHalozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
FY 2025
Royalty
53.6%$868M
Product
23.3%$376M
Collaborative Agreements
9.4%$152M
Bulk rHuPH20
8.2%$133M
Sales-based milestone
4.3%$70M
Upfront Fees
1.1%$18M

IBRX vs IMVT vs RCUS vs HALO — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLHALOLAGGINGRCUS

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — IBRX and HALO each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

HALO and IMVT operate at a comparable scale, with $1.4B and $0 in trailing revenue. HALO is the more profitable business, keeping 22.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to IBRX's -4.2%. On growth, IBRX holds the edge at +4.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricIBRX logoIBRXImmunityBio, Inc.IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…HALO logoHALOHalozyme Therapeu…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$83M$0$236M$1.4B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$245M-$487M-$391M$945M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$349M-$464M-$369M$317M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$324M-$423M-$489M$645M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+94.8%+90.7%+81.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-3.2%-168.6%+58.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-4.2%-156.4%+22.7%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-3.9%-2.1%+46.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+4.3%-39.3%+51.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+40.8%+19.7%+10.5%-2.1%
Evenly matched — IBRX and HALO each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — IBRX and RCUS and HALO each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
MetricIBRX logoIBRXImmunityBio, Inc.IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…HALO logoHALOHalozyme Therapeu…
Market CapShares × price$7.6B$5.5B$2.5B$7.7B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$8.0B$4.8B$2.4B$7.5B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-12.52x-9.97x-7.54x25.46x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.8.09x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.11x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple8.34x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue518.37x10.11x5.50x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share5.83x4.22x165.47x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF11.91x
Evenly matched — IBRX and RCUS and HALO each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

HALO leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

HALO delivers a 6.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-69 for RCUS. IMVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RCUS's 0.16x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HALO scores 5/9 vs RCUS's 0/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricIBRX logoIBRXImmunityBio, Inc.IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…HALO logoHALOHalozyme Therapeu…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-47.1%-69.0%+6.5%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-93.2%-44.1%-35.3%+12.5%
ROICReturn on invested capital-64.1%+73.4%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-88.9%-66.1%-42.1%+38.2%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–94205
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.00x0.16x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$361M-$714M-$123M-$134M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$143M$714M$222M$134M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$504M$98,000$99M$0
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-2.48x-13.38x46.08x
HALO leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

HALO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in IMVT five years ago would be worth $16,241 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,636 for IBRX. Over the past 12 months, IBRX leads with a +310.6% total return vs HALO's -7.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HALO at 29.1% vs IBRX's 6.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricIBRX logoIBRXImmunityBio, Inc.IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…HALO logoHALOHalozyme Therapeu…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+284.2%+5.1%+6.5%-7.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+310.6%+96.1%+209.6%-7.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+21.1%+40.9%+24.9%+115.3%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-53.6%+62.4%-18.6%+37.0%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-7.5%+173.6%+45.9%+570.7%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+6.6%+12.1%+7.7%+29.1%
HALO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — IMVT and HALO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

HALO is the less volatile stock with a 0.56 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IBRX's 2.21 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IMVT currently trades 90.5% from its 52-week high vs IBRX's 62.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricIBRX logoIBRXImmunityBio, Inc.IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…HALO logoHALOHalozyme Therapeu…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.21x1.37x1.95x0.56x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$12.43$30.09$28.72$82.22
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.83$13.36$7.06$47.50
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+62.4%+90.5%+86.3%+79.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10059.460.260.552.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded20.4M1.4M1.2M1.4M
Evenly matched — IMVT and HALO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: IBRX as "Buy", IMVT as "Buy", RCUS as "Buy", HALO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 74.0% upside for IBRX (target: $14) vs 20.2% for HALO (target: $78).

MetricIBRX logoIBRXImmunityBio, Inc.IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…HALO logoHALOHalozyme Therapeu…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$13.50$45.50$30.00$78.33
# AnalystsCovering analysts5231827
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%+4.5%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

HALO leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Profitability & Efficiency and Total Returns. 3 categories are tied.

Best OverallHalozyme Therapeutics, Inc. (HALO)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

IBRX vs IMVT vs RCUS vs HALO: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is IBRX or IMVT or RCUS or HALO a better buy right now?

For growth investors, ImmunityBio, Inc.

(IBRX) is the stronger pick with 22. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 3% for Arcus Biosciences, Inc. (RCUS). Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. (HALO) offers the better valuation at 25. 5x trailing P/E (8. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ImmunityBio, Inc. (IBRX) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — IBRX or IMVT or RCUS or HALO?

Over the past 5 years, Immunovant, Inc.

(IMVT) delivered a total return of +62. 4%, compared to -53. 6% for ImmunityBio, Inc. (IBRX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HALO returned +570. 7% versus IBRX's -7. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — IBRX or IMVT or RCUS or HALO?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.

(HALO) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 56β versus ImmunityBio, Inc. 's 2. 21β — meaning IBRX is approximately 297% more volatile than HALO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 16% for Arcus Biosciences, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — IBRX or IMVT or RCUS or HALO?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), ImmunityBio, Inc.

(IBRX) is pulling ahead at 22. 7% versus -4. 3% for Arcus Biosciences, Inc. (RCUS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ImmunityBio, Inc. grew EPS 46. 1% year-over-year, compared to -45. 2% for Immunovant, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, IBRX leads at 150. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — IBRX or IMVT or RCUS or HALO?

Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.

(HALO) is the more profitable company, earning 22. 7% net margin versus -28. 0% for ImmunityBio, Inc. — meaning it keeps 22. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HALO leads at 58. 4% versus -23. 3% for IBRX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IBRX leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is IBRX or IMVT or RCUS or HALO more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IBRX: 74.

0% to $13. 50.

07

Which pays a better dividend — IBRX or IMVT or RCUS or HALO?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

08

Is IBRX or IMVT or RCUS or HALO better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.

(HALO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 56), +570. 7% 10Y return). ImmunityBio, Inc. (IBRX) carries a higher beta of 2. 21 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HALO: +570. 7%, IBRX: -7. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between IBRX and IMVT and RCUS and HALO?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: IBRX is a small-cap high-growth stock; IMVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RCUS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HALO is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

IBRX

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 212%
  • Gross Margin > 56%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

IMVT

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

RCUS

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 54%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

HALO

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 25%
  • Net Margin > 13%
Run This Screen

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.