ICHR
Ichor Holdings, Ltd.
Semiconductors
Market Cap$2.47B
5Y Perf.+213.1%
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
ICHR vs MKSI vs ENTG vs UCTT vs ONTO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
MKSI
MKS Inc.
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Market Cap$20.25B
5Y Perf.+184.8%
ENTG
Entegris, Inc.
Semiconductors
Market Cap$22.48B
5Y Perf.+146.6%
UCTT
Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc.
Semiconductors
Market Cap$3.63B
5Y Perf.+285.4%
ONTO
Onto Innovation Inc.
Semiconductors
Market Cap$13.63B
5Y Perf.+781.7%
ICHR vs MKSI vs ENTG vs UCTT vs ONTO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ICHR | MKSI | ENTG | UCTT | ONTO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Semiconductors | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $2.47B | $20.25B | $22.48B | $3.63B | $13.63B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $959M | $4.07B | $3.24B | $2.07B | $1.03B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-51M | $327M | $265M | $-194M | $106M |
| Gross Margin | 11.3% | 45.2% | 43.2% | 15.6% | 48.8% |
| Operating Margin | -3.8% | 14.8% | 29.1% | -5.3% | 10.0% |
| Forward P/E | 62.2x | 30.4x | 41.4x | 34.4x | 38.7x |
| Total Debt | $186M | $4.69B | $3.89B | $810M | $17M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $98M | $675M | $360M | $312M | $346M |
ICHR vs MKSI vs ENTG vs UCTT vs ONTO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
ICHR
MKSI
ENTG
UCTT
ONTO
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ichor Holdings, Ltd. (ICHR) | 100 | 313.1 | +213.1% |
| MKS Inc. (MKSI) | 100 | 284.8 | +184.8% |
| Entegris, Inc. (ENTG) | 100 | 246.6 | +146.6% |
| Ultra Clean Holding… (UCTT) | 100 | 385.4 | +285.4% |
| Onto Innovation Inc. (ONTO) | 100 | 881.7 | +781.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ICHR vs MKSI vs ENTG vs UCTT vs ONTO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: MKSI leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. Ichor Holdings, Ltd. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. ONTO also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
ICHR
Ichor Holdings, Ltd.
The Growth Leader
ICHR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth and momentum is your priority.
- 11.6% revenue growth vs UCTT's -2.1%
- +329.1% vs ENTG's +88.9%
Best for: growth and momentum
MKSI
MKS Inc.
The Income Pick
MKSI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 2.64, yield 0.3%
- Rev growth 9.6%, EPS growth 55.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.5%
- Beta 2.64, yield 0.3%, current ratio 2.71x
- Lower P/E (30.4x vs 38.7x)
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
ENTG
Entegris, Inc.
The Technology Pick
ENTG lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Best for: technology exposure
UCTT
Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc.
The Technology Pick
Among these 5 stocks, UCTT doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
Best for: technology exposure
ONTO
Onto Innovation Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder
ONTO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 14.3% 10Y total return vs UCTT's 13.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.66, Low D/E 0.8%, current ratio 5.79x
- 10.3% margin vs UCTT's -9.4%
- 4.7% ROA vs UCTT's -11.0%, ROIC 5.7% vs 2.6%
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | ICHR | 11.6% revenue growth vs UCTT's -2.1% |
| Value | MKSI | Lower P/E (30.4x vs 38.7x) |
| Quality / Margins | ONTO | 10.3% margin vs UCTT's -9.4% |
| Stability / Safety | MKSI | Beta 2.64 vs ICHR's 3.93 |
| Dividends | MKSI | 0.3% yield, vs ENTG's 0.3%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) |
| Momentum (1Y) | ICHR | +329.1% vs ENTG's +88.9% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | ONTO | 4.7% ROA vs UCTT's -11.0%, ROIC 5.7% vs 2.6% |
ICHR vs MKSI vs ENTG vs UCTT vs ONTO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2025
FY 2025
FY 2025
FY 2025
ICHR vs MKSI vs ENTG vs UCTT vs ONTO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLONTOLAGGINGUCTT
Who Leads Where
ONTO leads in 2 of 6 categories
ICHR leads 0 • MKSI leads 0 • ENTG leads 0 • UCTT leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓UCTTUltra Clean Holdings,…
0leads
ENTGEntegris, Inc.
0leads
MKSIMKS Inc.
0leads
ICHRIchor Holdings, Ltd.
0leads
ONTOOnto Innovation Inc.
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs ICHRvs MKSIMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
ONTO3/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
Tied
—
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
ONTO4/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
Tied
—
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ONTO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MKSI is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.1B annually — 4.2x ICHR's $959M. ONTO is the more profitable business, keeping 10.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to UCTT's -9.4%. On growth, MKSI holds the edge at +15.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ICHRIchor Holdings, L… | MKSIMKS Inc. | ENTGEntegris, Inc. | UCTTUltra Clean Holdi… | ONTOOnto Innovation I… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $959M | $4.1B | $3.2B | $2.1B | $1.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$11M | $945M | $1.3B | -$52M | $158M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$51M | $327M | $265M | -$194M | $106M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$17M | $401M | $721M | -$44M | $239M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +11.3% | +45.2% | +43.2% | +15.6% | +48.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.8% | +14.8% | +29.1% | -5.3% | +10.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.3% | +8.0% | +8.2% | -9.4% | +10.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -1.7% | +9.8% | +22.3% | -2.1% | +23.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.7% | +15.2% | +5.0% | +2.9% | +9.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +46.2% | +53.2% | +46.3% | -2.6% | -48.5% |
ONTO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — ICHR and MKSI each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 68.8x trailing earnings, MKSI trades at a 30% valuation discount to ONTO's 98.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ENTG's 19.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ONTO's 68.8x.
| Metric | ICHRIchor Holdings, L… | MKSIMKS Inc. | ENTGEntegris, Inc. | UCTTUltra Clean Holdi… | ONTOOnto Innovation I… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.5B | $20.2B | $22.5B | $3.6B | $13.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.6B | $24.3B | $26.0B | $4.1B | $13.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -46.25x | 68.83x | 95.26x | -19.98x | 98.57x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 62.25x | 30.36x | 41.38x | 34.44x | 38.74x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 2.85x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 26.70x | 19.81x | 34.53x | 68.79x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.61x | 5.15x | 7.03x | 1.77x | 13.56x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.67x | 7.49x | 5.68x | 4.62x | 6.43x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 40.74x | 56.74x | 247.26x | 45.47x |
Evenly matched — ICHR and MKSI each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ONTO leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MKSI delivers a 12.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-25 for UCTT. ONTO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MKSI's 1.73x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MKSI scores 6/9 vs ICHR's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ICHRIchor Holdings, L… | MKSIMKS Inc. | ENTGEntegris, Inc. | UCTTUltra Clean Holdi… | ONTOOnto Innovation I… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -7.5% | +12.2% | +6.7% | -25.4% | +5.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.2% | +3.7% | +3.1% | -11.0% | +4.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -3.9% | +6.5% | +9.3% | +2.6% | +5.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -4.7% | +7.2% | +11.7% | +2.9% | +6.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.28x | 1.73x | 0.98x | 1.03x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $87M | $4.0B | $3.5B | $499M | -$329M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $98M | $675M | $360M | $312M | $346M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $186M | $4.7B | $3.9B | $810M | $17M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -5.97x | 2.84x | 2.47x | -5.80x | — |
ONTO leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — ICHR and MKSI and ONTO each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ONTO five years ago would be worth $41,263 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,895 for ICHR. Over the past 12 months, ICHR leads with a +329.1% total return vs ENTG's +88.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MKSI at 54.1% vs ENTG's 23.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ICHRIchor Holdings, L… | MKSIMKS Inc. | ENTGEntegris, Inc. | UCTTUltra Clean Holdi… | ONTOOnto Innovation I… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +249.0% | +78.8% | +65.1% | +192.5% | +65.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +329.1% | +306.1% | +88.9% | +312.7% | +118.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +151.1% | +266.0% | +87.4% | +187.5% | +218.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +28.9% | +66.5% | +30.4% | +59.4% | +312.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +629.1% | +750.6% | +1040.3% | +1385.1% | +1431.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +35.9% | +54.1% | +23.3% | +42.2% | +47.1% |
Evenly matched — ICHR and MKSI and ONTO each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ICHR and MKSI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MKSI is the less volatile stock with a 2.64 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ICHR's 3.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ICHR currently trades 97.7% from its 52-week high vs ONTO's 86.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ICHRIchor Holdings, L… | MKSIMKS Inc. | ENTGEntegris, Inc. | UCTTUltra Clean Holdi… | ONTOOnto Innovation I… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.93x | 2.64x | 2.66x | 3.19x | 2.66x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $72.87 | $326.83 | $159.15 | $87.68 | $315.86 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $13.12 | $71.49 | $66.32 | $18.52 | $85.88 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.7% | +92.0% | +92.8% | +91.1% | +86.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 66.9 | 65.3 | 63.8 | 62.3 | 61.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 795K | 1.2M | 2.4M | 1.3M | 832K |
Evenly matched — ICHR and MKSI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — MKSI and ENTG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ICHR as "Buy", MKSI as "Buy", ENTG as "Buy", UCTT as "Buy", ONTO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 12.5% upside for ONTO (target: $308) vs -30.1% for ICHR (target: $50). For income investors, MKSI offers the higher dividend yield at 0.29% vs ENTG's 0.27%.
| Metric | ICHRIchor Holdings, L… | MKSIMKS Inc. | ENTGEntegris, Inc. | UCTTUltra Clean Holdi… | ONTOOnto Innovation I… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $49.80 | $272.86 | $152.00 | $85.00 | $308.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 14 | 29 | 26 | 12 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.3% | +0.3% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.87 | $0.40 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.2% | 0.0% | +0.1% | +0.6% |
Evenly matched — MKSI and ENTG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
ONTO leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 4 categories are tied.
Best OverallOnto Innovation Inc. (ONTO)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
ICHR vs MKSI vs ENTG vs UCTT vs ONTO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ICHR or MKSI or ENTG or UCTT or ONTO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ichor Holdings, Ltd.
(ICHR) is the stronger pick with 11. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 1% for Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc. (UCTT). MKS Inc. (MKSI) offers the better valuation at 68. 8x trailing P/E (30. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ichor Holdings, Ltd. (ICHR) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ICHR or MKSI or ENTG or UCTT or ONTO?
On trailing P/E, MKS Inc.
(MKSI) is the cheapest at 68. 8x versus Onto Innovation Inc. at 98. 6x. On forward P/E, MKS Inc. is actually cheaper at 30. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ICHR or MKSI or ENTG or UCTT or ONTO?
Over the past 5 years, Onto Innovation Inc.
(ONTO) delivered a total return of +312. 6%, compared to +28. 9% for Ichor Holdings, Ltd. (ICHR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ONTO returned +1432% versus ICHR's +629. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ICHR or MKSI or ENTG or UCTT or ONTO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MKS Inc.
(MKSI) is the lower-risk stock at 2. 64β versus Ichor Holdings, Ltd. 's 3. 93β — meaning ICHR is approximately 49% more volatile than MKSI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Onto Innovation Inc. (ONTO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 173% for MKS Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ICHR or MKSI or ENTG or UCTT or ONTO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ichor Holdings, Ltd.
(ICHR) is pulling ahead at 11. 6% versus -2. 1% for Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc. (UCTT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MKS Inc. grew EPS 55. 5% year-over-year, compared to -869. 2% for Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MKSI leads at 3. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ICHR or MKSI or ENTG or UCTT or ONTO?
Onto Innovation Inc.
(ONTO) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 6% net margin versus -8. 8% for Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 13. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ENTG leads at 28. 9% versus -4. 1% for ICHR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ONTO leads at 49. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ICHR or MKSI or ENTG or UCTT or ONTO more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, MKS Inc.
(MKSI) trades at 30. 4x forward P/E versus 62. 2x for Ichor Holdings, Ltd. — 31. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ONTO: 12. 5% to $308. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — ICHR or MKSI or ENTG or UCTT or ONTO?
In this comparison, MKSI (0.
3% yield), ENTG (0. 3% yield) pay a dividend. ICHR, UCTT, ONTO do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ICHR or MKSI or ENTG or UCTT or ONTO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Onto Innovation Inc.
(ONTO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1432% 10Y return). Ichor Holdings, Ltd. (ICHR) carries a higher beta of 3. 93 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ONTO: +1432%, ICHR: +629. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ICHR and MKSI and ENTG and UCTT and ONTO?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
Revenue Growth>
%
(ICHR: 4.7% · MKSI: 15.2%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.