Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

ICON vs FRO vs TRMD vs DHT vs STNG

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
ICON
Icon Energy Corp.

Marine Shipping

IndustrialsNASDAQ • GR
Market Cap$2M
5Y Perf.-99.1%
FRO
Frontline Ltd.

Oil & Gas Midstream

EnergyNYSE • BM
Market Cap$8.48B
5Y Perf.+54.8%
TRMD
TORM plc

Oil & Gas Midstream

EnergyNASDAQ • GB
Market Cap$3.36B
5Y Perf.-14.4%
DHT
DHT Holdings, Inc.

Oil & Gas Midstream

EnergyNYSE • BM
Market Cap$3.06B
5Y Perf.+61.8%
STNG
Scorpio Tankers Inc.

Oil & Gas Midstream

EnergyNYSE • MC
Market Cap$4.38B
5Y Perf.+10.4%

ICON vs FRO vs TRMD vs DHT vs STNG — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
ICON logoICON
FRO logoFRO
TRMD logoTRMD
DHT logoDHT
STNG logoSTNG
IndustryMarine ShippingOil & Gas MidstreamOil & Gas MidstreamOil & Gas MidstreamOil & Gas Midstream
Market Cap$2M$8.48B$3.36B$3.06B$4.38B
Revenue (TTM)$6M$1.77B$1.29B$566M$1.04B
Net Income (TTM)$-5M$218M$277M$331M$502M
Gross Margin-0.7%26.5%47.2%47.5%51.8%
Operating Margin-32.2%25.5%26.6%50.1%38.8%
Forward P/E6.0x6.6x7.0x8.6x
Total Debt$16M$3.75B$1.23B$429M$619M
Cash & Equiv.$946K$414M$272M$79M$752M

ICON vs FRO vs TRMD vs DHT vs STNGLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

ICON
FRO
TRMD
DHT
STNG
StockJul 24May 26Return
Icon Energy Corp. (ICON)1000.9-99.1%
Frontline Ltd. (FRO)100154.8+54.8%
TORM plc (TRMD)10085.6-14.4%
DHT Holdings, Inc. (DHT)100161.8+61.8%
Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG)100110.4+10.4%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: ICON vs FRO vs TRMD vs DHT vs STNG

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: DHT leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Frontline Ltd. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and recent price momentum and sentiment. ICON and TRMD also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
ICON
Icon Energy Corp.
The Income Pick

ICON ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.50, yield 15.5%
  • 18.6% revenue growth vs STNG's -24.6%
Best for: income & stability
FRO
Frontline Ltd.
The Growth Play

FRO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and valuation efficiency is your priority.

  • Rev growth 13.8%, EPS growth -24.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 39.9%
  • PEG 0.26 vs TRMD's 0.29
  • Lower P/E (6.0x vs 7.0x)
  • +132.3% vs ICON's -14.9%
Best for: growth exposure and valuation efficiency
TRMD
TORM plc
The Long-Run Compounder

TRMD is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 5.9% 10Y total return vs FRO's 5.1%
  • 16.6% yield, vs STNG's 2.0%
Best for: long-term compounding
DHT
DHT Holdings, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

DHT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.27, Low D/E 37.8%, current ratio 2.80x
  • Beta 0.27, yield 3.9%, current ratio 2.80x
  • 58.6% margin vs ICON's -79.7%
  • Beta 0.27 vs TRMD's 0.54, lower leverage
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
STNG
Scorpio Tankers Inc.
The Lower-Volatility Pick

Among these 5 stocks, STNG doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: energy exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthICON logoICON18.6% revenue growth vs STNG's -24.6%
ValueFRO logoFROLower P/E (6.0x vs 7.0x)
Quality / MarginsDHT logoDHT58.6% margin vs ICON's -79.7%
Stability / SafetyDHT logoDHTBeta 0.27 vs TRMD's 0.54, lower leverage
DividendsTRMD logoTRMD16.6% yield, vs STNG's 2.0%
Momentum (1Y)FRO logoFRO+132.3% vs ICON's -14.9%
Efficiency (ROA)DHT logoDHT21.3% ROA vs ICON's -8.3%, ROIC 8.9% vs 0.8%

ICON vs FRO vs TRMD vs DHT vs STNG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

ICONIcon Energy Corp.
FY 2020
Wholesale License
71.1%$76M
Direct To Retail License
28.9%$31M
FROFrontline Ltd.
FY 2024
Voyage Charter
95.3%$2.0B
Time Charter
4.1%$85M
Administrative Income
0.5%$10M
TRMDTORM plc
FY 2024
Others
100.0%$1M
DHTDHT Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Voyage Charter Revenues
70.7%$351M
Time Charter Revenues
29.3%$146M
STNGScorpio Tankers Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

ICON vs FRO vs TRMD vs DHT vs STNG — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLDHTLAGGINGSTNG

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

DHT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

FRO is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.8B annually — 287.8x ICON's $6M. DHT is the more profitable business, keeping 58.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ICON's -79.7%. On growth, DHT holds the edge at +57.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricICON logoICONIcon Energy Corp.FRO logoFROFrontline Ltd.TRMD logoTRMDTORM plcDHT logoDHTDHT Holdings, Inc.STNG logoSTNGScorpio Tankers I…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$6M$1.8B$1.3B$566M$1.0B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$492,000$781M$555M$388M$580M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$5M$218M$277M$331M$502M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$24M$557M$242M-$131M$389M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue-0.7%+26.5%+47.2%+47.5%+51.8%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-32.2%+25.5%+26.6%+50.1%+38.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-79.7%+12.3%+21.4%+58.6%+48.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-3.9%+31.5%+18.7%-23.1%+37.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-11.8%-7.8%+57.3%+46.2%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-33.3%-43.0%+2.8%+2.5%
DHT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

ICON leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 5.2x trailing earnings, TRMD trades at a 70% valuation discount to FRO's 17.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TRMD offers better value at 0.23x vs FRO's 0.73x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricICON logoICONIcon Energy Corp.FRO logoFROFrontline Ltd.TRMD logoTRMDTORM plcDHT logoDHTDHT Holdings, Inc.STNG logoSTNGScorpio Tankers I…
Market CapShares × price$2M$8.5B$3.4B$3.1B$4.4B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$17M$11.8B$4.3B$3.4B$4.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-7.35x17.09x5.21x14.51x12.05x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.5.99x6.62x7.01x8.58x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.73x0.23x0.36x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple9.12x10.54x5.07x12.35x8.68x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.29x4.14x2.15x6.16x4.67x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.13x3.62x1.54x2.70x1.30x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF14.38x8.92x
ICON leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

DHT leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

DHT delivers a 29.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $29 in annual profit, vs $-24 for ICON. STNG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.19x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FRO's 1.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DHT scores 7/9 vs TRMD's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricICON logoICONIcon Energy Corp.FRO logoFROFrontline Ltd.TRMD logoTRMDTORM plcDHT logoDHTDHT Holdings, Inc.STNG logoSTNGScorpio Tankers I…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-23.9%+9.4%+12.9%+29.1%+15.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-8.3%+3.8%+8.7%+21.3%+12.6%
ROICReturn on invested capital+0.8%+10.6%+18.0%+8.9%+7.2%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+1.0%+14.1%+22.8%+11.7%+8.4%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–945476
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.36x1.60x0.59x0.38x0.19x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$15M$3.3B$954M$350M-$133M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$946,000$414M$272M$79M$752M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$16M$3.7B$1.2B$429M$619M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-0.97x1.87x4.61x25.61x6.82x
DHT leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

FRO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in FRO five years ago would be worth $56,570 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,257 for ICON. Over the past 12 months, FRO leads with a +132.3% total return vs ICON's -14.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FRO at 44.8% vs ICON's -49.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricICON logoICONIcon Energy Corp.FRO logoFROFrontline Ltd.TRMD logoTRMDTORM plcDHT logoDHTDHT Holdings, Inc.STNG logoSTNGScorpio Tankers I…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+91.4%+90.1%+70.8%+65.4%+71.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-14.9%+132.3%+113.4%+79.6%+115.3%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-87.4%+203.4%+57.3%+167.8%+92.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-87.4%+465.7%+435.1%+282.2%+359.0%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-87.4%+513.5%+585.5%+318.3%+62.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-49.9%+44.8%+16.3%+38.9%+24.4%
FRO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — DHT and STNG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

DHT is the less volatile stock with a 0.27 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TRMD's 0.54 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. STNG currently trades 96.9% from its 52-week high vs ICON's 29.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricICON logoICONIcon Energy Corp.FRO logoFROFrontline Ltd.TRMD logoTRMDTORM plcDHT logoDHTDHT Holdings, Inc.STNG logoSTNGScorpio Tankers I…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.50x0.36x0.54x0.27x0.28x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$4.23$39.89$34.88$20.55$87.39
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.55$16.25$15.79$10.61$37.96
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+29.6%+95.5%+94.9%+92.5%+96.9%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10059.761.462.358.860.5
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded277K4.0M924K4.7M1.2M
Evenly matched — DHT and STNG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — TRMD and STNG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: FRO as "Hold", TRMD as "Buy", DHT as "Buy", STNG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 5.7% upside for TRMD (target: $35) vs -5.3% for DHT (target: $18). For income investors, TRMD offers the higher dividend yield at 16.56% vs STNG's 1.99%.

MetricICON logoICONIcon Energy Corp.FRO logoFROFrontline Ltd.TRMD logoTRMDTORM plcDHT logoDHTDHT Holdings, Inc.STNG logoSTNGScorpio Tankers I…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$38.50$35.00$18.00$85.33
# AnalystsCovering analysts2231631
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+15.5%+5.1%+16.6%+3.9%+2.0%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises00003
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.19$1.95$5.48$0.74$1.69
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+100.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%+0.0%
Evenly matched — TRMD and STNG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

DHT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ICON leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallDHT Holdings, Inc. (DHT)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

ICON vs FRO vs TRMD vs DHT vs STNG: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is ICON or FRO or TRMD or DHT or STNG a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Icon Energy Corp.

(ICON) is the stronger pick with 18. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -24. 6% for Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG). TORM plc (TRMD) offers the better valuation at 5. 2x trailing P/E (6. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TORM plc (TRMD) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — ICON or FRO or TRMD or DHT or STNG?

On trailing P/E, TORM plc (TRMD) is the cheapest at 5.

2x versus Frontline Ltd. at 17. 1x. On forward P/E, Frontline Ltd. is actually cheaper at 6. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Frontline Ltd. wins at 0. 26x versus TORM plc's 0. 29x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — ICON or FRO or TRMD or DHT or STNG?

Over the past 5 years, Frontline Ltd.

(FRO) delivered a total return of +465. 7%, compared to -87. 4% for Icon Energy Corp. (ICON). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TRMD returned +585. 5% versus ICON's -87. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — ICON or FRO or TRMD or DHT or STNG?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), DHT Holdings, Inc.

(DHT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 27β versus TORM plc's 0. 54β — meaning TRMD is approximately 99% more volatile than DHT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 19% versus 160% for Frontline Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — ICON or FRO or TRMD or DHT or STNG?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Icon Energy Corp.

(ICON) is pulling ahead at 18. 6% versus -24. 6% for Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: DHT Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 17. 0% year-over-year, compared to -118. 1% for Icon Energy Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FRO leads at 39. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — ICON or FRO or TRMD or DHT or STNG?

DHT Holdings, Inc.

(DHT) is the more profitable company, earning 42. 5% net margin versus -4. 0% for Icon Energy Corp. — meaning it keeps 42. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TRMD leads at 42. 3% versus 3. 2% for ICON. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TRMD leads at 60. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is ICON or FRO or TRMD or DHT or STNG more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Frontline Ltd. (FRO) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 26x versus TORM plc's 0. 29x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Frontline Ltd. (FRO) trades at 6. 0x forward P/E versus 8. 6x for Scorpio Tankers Inc. — 2. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TRMD: 5. 7% to $35. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — ICON or FRO or TRMD or DHT or STNG?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

TORM plc (TRMD) offers the highest yield at 16. 6%, versus 2. 0% for Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG).

09

Is ICON or FRO or TRMD or DHT or STNG better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Frontline Ltd.

(FRO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 36), 5. 1% yield, +513. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FRO: +513. 5%, ICON: -87. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between ICON and FRO and TRMD and DHT and STNG?

These companies operate in different sectors (ICON (Industrials) and FRO (Energy) and TRMD (Energy) and DHT (Energy) and STNG (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: ICON is a small-cap high-growth stock; FRO is a small-cap deep-value stock; TRMD is a small-cap deep-value stock; DHT is a small-cap deep-value stock; STNG is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

ICON

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 9%
  • Dividend Yield > 6.2%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FRO

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 7%
  • Dividend Yield > 2.0%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TRMD

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 12%
  • Dividend Yield > 6.6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

DHT

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 28%
  • Net Margin > 35%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

STNG

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 23%
  • Net Margin > 29%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform ICON and FRO and TRMD and DHT and STNG on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(ICON: 18.6% · FRO: -11.8%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.