Conglomerates
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
IEP vs CODI vs CVR vs PSX vs VVV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Conglomerates
Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories
Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing
Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing
IEP vs CODI vs CVR vs PSX vs VVV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Conglomerates | Conglomerates | Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories | Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing | Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing |
| Market Cap | $5.00B | $875M | $10M | $72.27B | $4.13B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $9.74B | $1.95B | $26M | $135.77B | $1.76B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-385M | $-143M | $-4M | $4.12B | $86M |
| Gross Margin | 10.1% | 42.8% | 8.3% | 7.0% | 38.6% |
| Operating Margin | 1.6% | 18.7% | -14.7% | 4.7% | 17.6% |
| Forward P/E | 18.9x | 145.4x | — | 12.3x | 19.1x |
| Total Debt | $8.71B | $3.53B | $0.00 | $22.88B | $1.67B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4.34B | $60M | $2M | $1.12B | $52M |
IEP vs CODI vs CVR vs PSX vs VVV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Icahn Enterprises L… (IEP) | 100 | 16.7 | -83.3% |
| Compass Diversified (CODI) | 100 | 68.5 | -31.5% |
| Chicago Rivet & Mac… (CVR) | 100 | 53.7 | -46.3% |
| Phillips 66 (PSX) | 100 | 230.3 | +130.3% |
| Valvoline Inc. (VVV) | 100 | 176.7 | +76.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IEP vs CODI vs CVR vs PSX vs VVV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
IEP is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.60, yield 10.1%
- Beta 0.60, yield 10.1%, current ratio 3.41x
CODI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth and dividends is your priority.
- 5.8% revenue growth vs IEP's -14.7%
- 14.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs PSX's 2.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Among these 5 stocks, CVR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
PSX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 174.6% 10Y total return vs CODI's 52.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.43, Low D/E 75.7%, current ratio 1.30x
- Lower P/E (12.3x vs 19.1x)
- Beta 0.43 vs CODI's 1.09, lower leverage
VVV ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 5.6%, EPS growth 1.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.4%
- 4.9% margin vs CVR's -13.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.8% revenue growth vs IEP's -14.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.3x vs 19.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 4.9% margin vs CVR's -13.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.43 vs CODI's 1.09, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 14.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs PSX's 2.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +73.2% vs CODI's -33.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.3% ROA vs CVR's -14.7%, ROIC 5.3% vs -18.1% |
IEP vs CODI vs CVR vs PSX vs VVV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
IEP vs CODI vs CVR vs PSX vs VVV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PSX leads in 2 of 6 categories
IEP leads 0 • CODI leads 0 • CVR leads 0 • VVV leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — CODI and VVV each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PSX is the larger business by revenue, generating $135.8B annually — 5220.3x CVR's $26M. VVV is the more profitable business, keeping 4.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CVR's -13.6%. On growth, PSX holds the edge at +11.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $9.7B | $2.0B | $26M | $135.8B | $1.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $689M | $501M | -$3M | $9.4B | $434M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$385M | -$143M | -$4M | $4.1B | $86M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$2M | -$100M | -$2M | $119M | $58M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +10.1% | +42.8% | +8.3% | +7.0% | +38.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.6% | +18.7% | -14.7% | +4.7% | +17.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.0% | -7.3% | -13.6% | +3.0% | +4.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.0% | -5.1% | -6.1% | +0.1% | +3.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +0.7% | -18.9% | +5.6% | +11.7% | +11.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.6% | -16.5% | +104.7% | -56.8% | -136.6% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — IEP and CVR each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.7x trailing earnings, PSX trades at a 67% valuation discount to CODI's 50.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, VVV's 13.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CODI's 42.7x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.0B | $875M | $10M | $72.3B | $4.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $9.4B | $4.3B | $8M | $94.0B | $5.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -8.86x | 50.57x | -1.81x | 16.71x | 19.77x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 18.93x | 145.38x | — | 12.25x | 19.08x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.14x | 42.70x | — | 13.79x | 13.41x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.49x | 0.49x | 0.38x | 0.55x | 2.41x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.84x | 1.65x | 0.51x | 2.43x | 12.32x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.06x | — | — | 26.48x | 108.56x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — PSX and VVV each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
VVV delivers a 28.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $28 in annual profit, vs $-45 for CODI. PSX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.76x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CODI's 6.66x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PSX scores 7/9 vs CODI's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -11.3% | -45.0% | -17.7% | +14.1% | +28.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.6% | -4.4% | -14.7% | +5.3% | +2.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.1% | -0.3% | -18.1% | +5.3% | +12.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.0% | -1.5% | -21.9% | +6.0% | +14.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.89x | 6.66x | — | 0.76x | 4.93x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4.4B | $3.5B | -$2M | $21.8B | $1.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4.3B | $60M | $2M | $1.1B | $52M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $8.7B | $3.5B | $0 | $22.9B | $1.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.03x | 0.02x | — | 7.65x | 3.05x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PSX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PSX five years ago would be worth $23,707 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,158 for CVR. Over the past 12 months, PSX leads with a +73.2% total return vs CODI's -33.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PSX at 27.6% vs CVR's -25.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +18.0% | +150.1% | -24.5% | +39.0% | +12.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +16.6% | -33.5% | -15.0% | +73.2% | -5.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -51.9% | -28.3% | -58.4% | +107.5% | -5.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -40.3% | -37.1% | -48.4% | +137.1% | +4.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +21.4% | +52.0% | -27.2% | +174.6% | +51.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -21.7% | -10.5% | -25.3% | +27.6% | -1.8% |
Risk & Volatility
PSX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PSX is the less volatile stock with a 0.43 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CODI's 1.09 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PSX currently trades 94.6% from its 52-week high vs CODI's 65.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.60x | 1.09x | 0.97x | 0.43x | 0.86x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.99 | $17.67 | $15.00 | $190.61 | $41.33 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.08 | $4.58 | $8.15 | $104.83 | $28.50 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +83.4% | +65.8% | +70.3% | +94.6% | +78.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 71.8 | 73.3 | 46.4 | 62.8 | 41.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 931K | 1.2M | 3K | 3.0M | 1.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CODI and PSX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: IEP as "Buy", CODI as "Hold", PSX as "Buy", VVV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 29.0% upside for CODI (target: $15) vs -9.4% for PSX (target: $163). For income investors, CODI offers the higher dividend yield at 14.18% vs PSX's 2.61%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $15.00 | — | $163.38 | $41.40 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 14 | — | 35 | 23 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +10.1% | +14.2% | +3.1% | +2.6% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 1 | 0 | 13 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.84 | $1.65 | $0.33 | $4.71 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.1% | 0.0% | +1.7% | +1.9% |
PSX leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Total Returns and Risk & Volatility. 4 categories are tied.
IEP vs CODI vs CVR vs PSX vs VVV: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IEP or CODI or CVR or PSX or VVV a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Compass Diversified (CODI) is the stronger pick with 5.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -14. 7% for Icahn Enterprises L. P. (IEP). Phillips 66 (PSX) offers the better valuation at 16. 7x trailing P/E (12. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Icahn Enterprises L. P. (IEP) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — IEP or CODI or CVR or PSX or VVV?
On trailing P/E, Phillips 66 (PSX) is the cheapest at 16.
7x versus Compass Diversified at 50. 6x. On forward P/E, Phillips 66 is actually cheaper at 12. 3x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — IEP or CODI or CVR or PSX or VVV?
Over the past 5 years, Phillips 66 (PSX) delivered a total return of +137.
1%, compared to -48. 4% for Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. (CVR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PSX returned +174. 6% versus CVR's -27. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — IEP or CODI or CVR or PSX or VVV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Phillips 66 (PSX) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
43β versus Compass Diversified's 1. 09β — meaning CODI is approximately 153% more volatile than PSX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Phillips 66 (PSX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 76% versus 7% for Compass Diversified — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — IEP or CODI or CVR or PSX or VVV?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Compass Diversified (CODI) is pulling ahead at 5.
8% versus -14. 7% for Icahn Enterprises L. P. (IEP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Phillips 66 grew EPS 116. 2% year-over-year, compared to -90. 7% for Compass Diversified. Over a 3-year CAGR, VVV leads at 11. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — IEP or CODI or CVR or PSX or VVV?
Valvoline Inc.
(VVV) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 3% net margin versus -20. 8% for Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. — meaning it keeps 12. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: VVV leads at 18. 0% versus -19. 1% for CVR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CODI leads at 42. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is IEP or CODI or CVR or PSX or VVV more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Phillips 66 (PSX) trades at 12.
3x forward P/E versus 145. 4x for Compass Diversified — 133. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CODI: 29. 0% to $15. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — IEP or CODI or CVR or PSX or VVV?
In this comparison, CODI (14.
2% yield), IEP (10. 1% yield), CVR (3. 1% yield), PSX (2. 6% yield) pay a dividend. VVV does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is IEP or CODI or CVR or PSX or VVV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Phillips 66 (PSX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
43), 2. 6% yield, +174. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PSX: +174. 6%, VVV: +51. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between IEP and CODI and CVR and PSX and VVV?
These companies operate in different sectors (IEP (Industrials) and CODI (Industrials) and CVR (Industrials) and PSX (Energy) and VVV (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: IEP is a small-cap income-oriented stock; CODI is a small-cap income-oriented stock; CVR is a small-cap income-oriented stock; PSX is a mid-cap deep-value stock; VVV is a small-cap quality compounder stock. IEP, CODI, CVR, PSX pay a dividend while VVV does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.