Software - Application
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
IFBD vs FIVN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
IFBD vs FIVN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Infrastructure |
| Market Cap | $5M | $1.70B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5M | $1.17B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-2M | $57M |
| Gross Margin | 39.3% | 55.1% |
| Operating Margin | -99.4% | 4.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 7.0x |
| Total Debt | $505K | $847M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5M | $232M |
IFBD vs FIVN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Infobird Co., Ltd (IFBD) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Five9, Inc. (FIVN) | 100 | 11.8 | -88.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IFBD vs FIVN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
IFBD is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 413.5%, EPS growth 84.0%, 3Y rev CAGR -47.0%
- Lower volatility, beta -0.09, Low D/E 0.8%, current ratio 2.63x
- 413.5% revenue growth vs FIVN's 10.3%
FIVN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and defensive.
- 125.4% 10Y total return vs IFBD's -100.0%
- Beta 1.79, current ratio 4.09x
- 4.9% margin vs IFBD's -32.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 413.5% revenue growth vs FIVN's 10.3% | |
| Quality / Margins | 4.9% margin vs IFBD's -32.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Lower D/E ratio (0.8% vs 107.8%) | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -11.9% vs IFBD's -15.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.2% ROA vs IFBD's -2.3%, ROIC 1.7% vs -2.2% |
IFBD vs FIVN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
IFBD vs FIVN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FIVN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FIVN is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.2B annually — 227.6x IFBD's $5M. FIVN is the more profitable business, keeping 4.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to IFBD's -32.7%. On growth, IFBD holds the edge at +171.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5M | $1.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$5M | $140M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$2M | $57M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$4M | $206M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +39.3% | +55.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -99.4% | +4.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -32.7% | +4.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -70.6% | +17.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +171.2% | +9.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.7% | +20.0% |
Valuation Metrics
IFBD leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5M | $1.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $994,534 | $2.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.90x | 48.26x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 6.96x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 16.84x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.60x | 1.48x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.03x | 2.46x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 8.45x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FIVN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FIVN delivers a 7.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-2 for IFBD. IFBD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FIVN's 1.08x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FIVN scores 8/9 vs IFBD's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.5% | +7.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.3% | +3.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.2% | +1.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.7% | +2.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 1.08x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$4M | $615M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5M | $232M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $505,225 | $847M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.95x | 7.94x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FIVN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FIVN five years ago would be worth $1,305 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1 for IFBD. Over the past 12 months, FIVN leads with a -11.9% total return vs IFBD's -15.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FIVN at -27.2% vs IFBD's -84.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -6.9% | +18.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -15.2% | -11.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.6% | -61.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -87.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +125.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -84.3% | -27.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — IFBD and FIVN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IFBD is the less volatile stock with a -0.09 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FIVN's 1.79 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FIVN currently trades 73.1% from its 52-week high vs IFBD's 56.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.09x | 1.79x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.69 | $30.38 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.66 | $13.29 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +56.2% | +73.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.7 | 68.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3K | 2.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $28.40 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 41 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.9% |
FIVN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). IFBD leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
IFBD vs FIVN: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IFBD or FIVN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Infobird Co.
, Ltd (IFBD) is the stronger pick with 413. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 10. 3% for Five9, Inc. (FIVN). Five9, Inc. (FIVN) offers the better valuation at 48. 3x trailing P/E (7. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Five9, Inc. (FIVN) a "Buy" — based on 41 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — IFBD or FIVN?
Over the past 5 years, Five9, Inc.
(FIVN) delivered a total return of -87. 0%, compared to -100. 0% for Infobird Co. , Ltd (IFBD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FIVN returned +125. 4% versus IFBD's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — IFBD or FIVN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Infobird Co.
, Ltd (IFBD) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 09β versus Five9, Inc. 's 1. 79β — meaning FIVN is approximately -2158% more volatile than IFBD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Infobird Co. , Ltd (IFBD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 108% for Five9, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — IFBD or FIVN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Infobird Co.
, Ltd (IFBD) is pulling ahead at 413. 5% versus 10. 3% for Five9, Inc. (FIVN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Five9, Inc. grew EPS 370. 6% year-over-year, compared to 84. 0% for Infobird Co. , Ltd. Over a 3-year CAGR, FIVN leads at 13. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — IFBD or FIVN?
Five9, Inc.
(FIVN) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 4% net margin versus -146. 0% for Infobird Co. , Ltd — meaning it keeps 3. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FIVN leads at 2. 8% versus -120. 6% for IFBD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FIVN leads at 54. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — IFBD or FIVN?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is IFBD or FIVN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Infobird Co.
, Ltd (IFBD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 09)). Five9, Inc. (FIVN) carries a higher beta of 1. 79 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (IFBD: -100. 0%, FIVN: +125. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between IFBD and FIVN?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: IFBD is a small-cap high-growth stock; FIVN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.