Biotechnology
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
IKT vs PRTA vs ACAD vs KO vs BIIB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
Drug Manufacturers - General
IKT vs PRTA vs ACAD vs KO vs BIIB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic | Drug Manufacturers - General |
| Market Cap | $119M | $432M | $3.61B | $355.61B | $29.53B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $58M | $1.10B | $49.28B | $9.86B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-51M | $-151M | $376M | $13.70B | $1.37B |
| Gross Margin | — | 46.8% | 91.5% | 61.7% | 69.8% |
| Operating Margin | — | -217.9% | 7.4% | 29.3% | 15.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 176.7x | 54.2x | 25.3x | 13.7x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $14M | $52M | $45.49B | $6.95B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $139M | $308M | $178M | $10.27B | $3.01B |
IKT vs PRTA vs ACAD vs KO vs BIIB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inhibikase Therapeu… (IKT) | 100 | 4.0 | -96.0% |
| Prothena Corporatio… (PRTA) | 100 | 68.7 | -31.3% |
| ACADIA Pharmaceutic… (ACAD) | 100 | 39.5 | -60.5% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 150.7 | +50.7% |
| Biogen Inc. (BIIB) | 100 | 81.7 | -18.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IKT vs PRTA vs ACAD vs KO vs BIIB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
IKT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth.
- 129.4% revenue growth vs PRTA's -92.8%
PRTA is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +62.7% vs IKT's -12.6%
ACAD has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 11.9%, EPS growth 68.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 27.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.10, Low D/E 4.3%, current ratio 3.83x
- 34.3% margin vs PRTA's -260.9%
- 26.2% ROA vs PRTA's -42.3%, ROIC 10.0% vs -21.0%
KO is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 121.1% 10Y total return vs BIIB's -18.1%
- 2.5% yield; 56-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
BIIB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.40
- Beta 0.40, current ratio 2.68x
- Lower P/E (13.7x vs 25.3x)
- Beta 0.40 vs IKT's 1.92
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 129.4% revenue growth vs PRTA's -92.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.7x vs 25.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 34.3% margin vs PRTA's -260.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.40 vs IKT's 1.92 | |
| Dividends | 2.5% yield; 56-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +62.7% vs IKT's -12.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 26.2% ROA vs PRTA's -42.3%, ROIC 10.0% vs -21.0% |
IKT vs PRTA vs ACAD vs KO vs BIIB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
IKT vs PRTA vs ACAD vs KO vs BIIB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KO leads in 4 of 6 categories
BIIB leads 1 • IKT leads 0 • PRTA leads 0 • ACAD leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — PRTA and ACAD each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO and IKT operate at a comparable scale, with $49.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. ACAD is the more profitable business, keeping 34.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PRTA's -2.6%. On growth, PRTA holds the edge at +17.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $58M | $1.1B | $49.3B | $9.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$55M | -$124M | $96M | $15.5B | $2.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$51M | -$151M | $376M | $13.7B | $1.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$36M | -$81M | $212M | $12.6B | $2.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +46.8% | +91.5% | +61.7% | +69.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -2.2% | +7.4% | +29.3% | +15.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -2.6% | +34.3% | +27.8% | +13.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -140.6% | +19.4% | +25.5% | +26.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +17.1% | +9.7% | +12.1% | +1.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -13.3% | +153.6% | -81.8% | +18.2% | +31.1% |
Valuation Metrics
BIIB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.2x trailing earnings, ACAD trades at a 66% valuation discount to KO's 27.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BIIB's 11.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than KO's 26.4x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $119M | $432M | $3.6B | $355.6B | $29.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$21M | $138M | $3.5B | $390.8B | $33.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3.41x | -1.82x | 9.21x | 27.18x | 22.66x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 176.66x | 54.20x | 25.27x | 13.69x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 2.43x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 25.09x | 26.39x | 11.90x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 44.60x | 3.37x | 7.42x | 3.01x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.95x | 1.58x | 2.94x | 10.40x | 1.61x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 34.34x | 67.15x | 14.40x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-50 for PRTA. ACAD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KO's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs PRTA's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -41.3% | -49.9% | +35.6% | +41.1% | +7.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -39.0% | -42.3% | +26.2% | +13.1% | +4.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -108.0% | -21.0% | +10.0% | +15.8% | +6.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -38.8% | -47.0% | +10.1% | +17.3% | +7.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.05x | 0.04x | 1.33x | 0.38x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$139M | -$294M | -$126M | $35.2B | $3.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $139M | $308M | $178M | $10.3B | $3.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $14M | $52M | $45.5B | $6.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | — | 10.70x | 6.91x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KO five years ago would be worth $16,560 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $573 for IKT. Over the past 12 months, PRTA leads with a +62.7% total return vs IKT's -12.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KO at 13.7% vs PRTA's -51.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -14.4% | -10.3% | -19.3% | +20.3% | +12.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -12.6% | +62.7% | -3.0% | +17.2% | +51.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -59.5% | -88.7% | -14.3% | +47.0% | -36.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.3% | -82.7% | -22.6% | +65.6% | -50.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.2% | -82.0% | -44.6% | +121.1% | -18.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -26.0% | -51.7% | -5.0% | +13.7% | -13.9% |
Risk & Volatility
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IKT's 1.92 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 98.3% from its 52-week high vs PRTA's 69.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.92x | 1.50x | 1.10x | -0.20x | 0.40x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.26 | $11.80 | $27.81 | $84.04 | $205.97 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.33 | $4.95 | $19.69 | $65.35 | $121.05 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +73.9% | +69.9% | +75.8% | +98.3% | +97.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.1 | 35.6 | 47.9 | 60.6 | 57.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 787K | 447K | 1.4M | 12.7M | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
KO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: IKT as "Hold", PRTA as "Buy", ACAD as "Buy", KO as "Buy", BIIB as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 199.4% upside for IKT (target: $5) vs 4.2% for KO (target: $86). KO is the only dividend payer here at 2.46% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $5.00 | $19.00 | $34.78 | $86.13 | $218.16 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 28 | 37 | 48 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +2.5% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 56 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $2.04 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.2% | 0.0% |
KO leads in 4 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). BIIB leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
IKT vs PRTA vs ACAD vs KO vs BIIB: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IKT or PRTA or ACAD or KO or BIIB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(ACAD) is the stronger pick with 11. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -92. 8% for Prothena Corporation plc (PRTA). ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. (ACAD) offers the better valuation at 9. 2x trailing P/E (54. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Prothena Corporation plc (PRTA) a "Buy" — based on 28 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — IKT or PRTA or ACAD or KO or BIIB?
On trailing P/E, ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(ACAD) is the cheapest at 9. 2x versus The Coca-Cola Company at 27. 2x. On forward P/E, Biogen Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — IKT or PRTA or ACAD or KO or BIIB?
Over the past 5 years, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) delivered a total return of +65.
6%, compared to -94. 3% for Inhibikase Therapeutics, Inc. (IKT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KO returned +121. 1% versus IKT's -97. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — IKT or PRTA or ACAD or KO or BIIB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
20β versus Inhibikase Therapeutics, Inc. 's 1. 92β — meaning IKT is approximately -1057% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. (ACAD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 133% for The Coca-Cola Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — IKT or PRTA or ACAD or KO or BIIB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(ACAD) is pulling ahead at 11. 9% versus -92. 8% for Prothena Corporation plc (PRTA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. grew EPS 68. 4% year-over-year, compared to -99. 6% for Prothena Corporation plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, ACAD leads at 27. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — IKT or PRTA or ACAD or KO or BIIB?
ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(ACAD) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 5% net margin versus -25. 2% for Prothena Corporation plc — meaning it keeps 36. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus -1905. 8% for PRTA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ACAD leads at 91. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is IKT or PRTA or ACAD or KO or BIIB more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Biogen Inc.
(BIIB) trades at 13. 7x forward P/E versus 176. 7x for Prothena Corporation plc — 163. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IKT: 199. 4% to $5. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — IKT or PRTA or ACAD or KO or BIIB?
In this comparison, KO (2.
5% yield) pays a dividend. IKT, PRTA, ACAD, BIIB do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is IKT or PRTA or ACAD or KO or BIIB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Inhibikase Therapeutics, Inc. (IKT) carries a higher beta of 1. 92 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, IKT: -97. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between IKT and PRTA and ACAD and KO and BIIB?
These companies operate in different sectors (IKT (Healthcare) and PRTA (Healthcare) and ACAD (Healthcare) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and BIIB (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: IKT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRTA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ACAD is a small-cap deep-value stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; BIIB is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. KO pays a dividend while IKT, PRTA, ACAD, BIIB do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.