Biotechnology
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
IKT vs PRTA vs IONS vs BIIB vs REGN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Drug Manufacturers - General
Biotechnology
IKT vs PRTA vs IONS vs BIIB vs REGN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - General | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $119M | $432M | $12.20B | $29.52B | $63.53B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $58M | $1.06B | $9.86B | $14.92B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-51M | $-151M | $-327M | $1.37B | $4.42B |
| Gross Margin | — | 46.8% | 98.3% | 69.8% | 84.5% |
| Operating Margin | — | -217.9% | -33.3% | 15.6% | 24.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | 176.7x | — | 13.7x | 13.2x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $14M | $2.61B | $6.95B | $2.71B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $139M | $308M | $372M | $3.01B | $3.12B |
IKT vs PRTA vs IONS vs BIIB vs REGN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inhibikase Therapeu… (IKT) | 100 | 4.0 | -96.0% |
| Prothena Corporatio… (PRTA) | 100 | 68.7 | -31.3% |
| Ionis Pharmaceutica… (IONS) | 100 | 129.6 | +29.6% |
| Biogen Inc. (BIIB) | 100 | 81.7 | -18.3% |
| Regeneron Pharmaceu… (REGN) | 100 | 126.7 | +26.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IKT vs PRTA vs IONS vs BIIB vs REGN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
IKT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth is your priority.
- 129.4% revenue growth vs PRTA's -92.8%
Among these 5 stocks, PRTA doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
IONS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 33.9%, EPS growth 21.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 17.1%
- 243.8% 10Y total return vs REGN's 68.0%
- +104.0% vs IKT's -14.8%
BIIB is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.39, Low D/E 38.1%, current ratio 2.68x
- Beta 0.39, current ratio 2.68x
- Beta 0.39 vs IKT's 1.98
REGN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.50, yield 0.6%
- Better valuation composite
- 29.6% margin vs PRTA's -260.9%
- 0.6% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 129.4% revenue growth vs PRTA's -92.8% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 29.6% margin vs PRTA's -260.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.39 vs IKT's 1.98 | |
| Dividends | 0.6% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +104.0% vs IKT's -14.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.1% ROA vs PRTA's -42.3%, ROIC 8.9% vs -21.0% |
IKT vs PRTA vs IONS vs BIIB vs REGN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
IKT vs PRTA vs IONS vs BIIB vs REGN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
REGN leads in 3 of 6 categories
BIIB leads 2 • IONS leads 1 • IKT leads 0 • PRTA leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
REGN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
REGN and IKT operate at a comparable scale, with $14.9B and $0 in trailing revenue. REGN is the more profitable business, keeping 29.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PRTA's -2.6%. On growth, PRTA holds the edge at +17.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $58M | $1.1B | $9.9B | $14.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$55M | -$124M | $4.5B | $2.4B | $4.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$51M | -$151M | -$327M | $1.4B | $4.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$36M | -$81M | -$971M | $2.6B | $4.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +46.8% | +98.3% | +69.8% | +84.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -2.2% | -33.3% | +15.6% | +24.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -2.6% | -30.9% | +13.9% | +29.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -140.6% | -91.8% | +26.6% | +27.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +17.1% | +87.0% | +1.9% | +19.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -13.3% | +153.6% | +39.8% | +31.1% | -7.2% |
Valuation Metrics
BIIB leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.7x trailing earnings, REGN trades at a 35% valuation discount to BIIB's 22.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BIIB's 11.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than REGN's 15.3x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $119M | $432M | $12.2B | $29.5B | $63.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$21M | $139M | $14.4B | $33.5B | $63.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3.41x | -1.82x | -31.02x | 22.65x | 14.74x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 176.66x | — | 13.68x | 13.18x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 2.33x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 11.90x | 15.31x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 44.65x | 12.92x | 3.01x | 4.43x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.95x | 1.59x | 24.15x | 1.61x | 2.12x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 14.40x | 15.57x |
Profitability & Efficiency
REGN leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
REGN delivers a 14.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $-59 for IONS. PRTA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IONS's 5.35x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BIIB scores 5/9 vs PRTA's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -41.3% | -49.9% | -58.6% | +7.5% | +14.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -39.0% | -42.3% | -10.1% | +4.7% | +11.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -108.0% | -21.0% | -12.8% | +6.5% | +8.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -38.8% | -47.0% | -14.1% | +7.7% | +10.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.05x | 5.35x | 0.38x | 0.09x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$139M | -$294M | $2.2B | $3.9B | -$412M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $139M | $308M | $372M | $3.0B | $3.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $14M | $2.6B | $6.9B | $2.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | -3.64x | 6.91x | 108.44x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IONS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IONS five years ago would be worth $19,462 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $467 for IKT. Over the past 12 months, IONS leads with a +104.0% total return vs IKT's -14.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IONS at 21.0% vs PRTA's -51.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -14.4% | -10.2% | -7.3% | +12.5% | -21.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -14.8% | +62.0% | +104.0% | +50.3% | +18.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -59.5% | -88.7% | +77.3% | -36.2% | -18.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -95.3% | -81.7% | +94.6% | -49.6% | +17.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.2% | -81.9% | +243.8% | -18.2% | +68.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -26.0% | -51.6% | +21.0% | -13.9% | -6.5% |
Risk & Volatility
BIIB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BIIB is the less volatile stock with a 0.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IKT's 1.98 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BIIB currently trades 97.1% from its 52-week high vs PRTA's 70.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.92x | 1.50x | 0.42x | 0.40x | 0.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.26 | $11.80 | $86.74 | $205.97 | $821.11 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.33 | $4.95 | $34.78 | $121.05 | $503.25 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +73.9% | +70.0% | +85.1% | +97.1% | +74.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.0 | 29.8 | 44.2 | 51.7 | 33.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 794K | 458K | 1.6M | 1.1M | 874K |
Analyst Outlook
REGN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: IKT as "Hold", PRTA as "Buy", IONS as "Buy", BIIB as "Buy", REGN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 199.4% upside for IKT (target: $5) vs 6.2% for BIIB (target: $212). REGN is the only dividend payer here at 0.56% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $5.00 | $19.00 | $107.27 | $212.26 | $836.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 28 | 32 | 48 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +0.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $3.41 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +6.2% |
REGN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BIIB leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility).
IKT vs PRTA vs IONS vs BIIB vs REGN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IKT or PRTA or IONS or BIIB or REGN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(IONS) is the stronger pick with 33. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -92. 8% for Prothena Corporation plc (PRTA). Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN) offers the better valuation at 14. 7x trailing P/E (13. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Prothena Corporation plc (PRTA) a "Buy" — based on 28 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — IKT or PRTA or IONS or BIIB or REGN?
On trailing P/E, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(REGN) is the cheapest at 14. 7x versus Biogen Inc. at 22. 6x. On forward P/E, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — IKT or PRTA or IONS or BIIB or REGN?
Over the past 5 years, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(IONS) delivered a total return of +94. 6%, compared to -95. 3% for Inhibikase Therapeutics, Inc. (IKT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IONS returned +241. 3% versus IKT's -97. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — IKT or PRTA or IONS or BIIB or REGN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Biogen Inc.
(BIIB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 40β versus Inhibikase Therapeutics, Inc. 's 1. 92β — meaning IKT is approximately 373% more volatile than BIIB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Prothena Corporation plc (PRTA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 5% for Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — IKT or PRTA or IONS or BIIB or REGN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(IONS) is pulling ahead at 33. 9% versus -92. 8% for Prothena Corporation plc (PRTA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Inhibikase Therapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 57. 8% year-over-year, compared to -99. 6% for Prothena Corporation plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, IONS leads at 17. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — IKT or PRTA or IONS or BIIB or REGN?
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(REGN) is the more profitable company, earning 31. 4% net margin versus -25. 2% for Prothena Corporation plc — meaning it keeps 31. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: REGN leads at 24. 9% versus -1905. 8% for PRTA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IONS leads at 98. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is IKT or PRTA or IONS or BIIB or REGN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(REGN) trades at 13. 2x forward P/E versus 176. 7x for Prothena Corporation plc — 163. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IKT: 199. 4% to $5. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — IKT or PRTA or IONS or BIIB or REGN?
In this comparison, REGN (0.
6% yield) pays a dividend. IKT, PRTA, IONS, BIIB do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is IKT or PRTA or IONS or BIIB or REGN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(REGN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 51), 0. 6% yield). Inhibikase Therapeutics, Inc. (IKT) carries a higher beta of 1. 92 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (REGN: +68. 2%, IKT: -97. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between IKT and PRTA and IONS and BIIB and REGN?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: IKT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRTA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IONS is a mid-cap high-growth stock; BIIB is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; REGN is a mid-cap deep-value stock. REGN pays a dividend while IKT, PRTA, IONS, BIIB do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.